Tonometría neumática versus tonometría por aplanaciónAnálisis crítico
- Ayala, M.J.
- Ruiz, J.M.
- Artola, A.
- Mulet, M.E.
- Alió, J. L
ISSN: 0365-6691
Année de publication: 1990
Volumen: 59
Número: 1
Pages: 29-36
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia
Résumé
We have evaluated the clinical efficacy of the pneumotonometer Pulsair-Keeler regarding conventional applanation Goldman tonometry in a consecutive serie of 500 normal and glaucomatous eyes. The results here obtained indicate a statistical significative difference (P < 0,05) between both types of tonometry. Pneumotonography shows a significative tendency to overestimate low and underestimate high 9 ocular tensions. No satistical significant differences are found between pneumotonometry and Goldmann tonometry in values from 19 to 24 mmHg.