A análise do discurso em empreendedorismo socialO caso da rede IVG - Brasil

  1. Machado, Monica Cristina Rovaris 1
  2. Lenzi, Fernando César 2
  3. Verdú, Clemente Antonio Penalva 3
  1. 1 Universidade Federal de Sergipe – UFS- Brasil
  2. 2 Universidade do Vale do Itajai – Univali , Brasil
  3. 3 Universidade de Alicante – UA – España
Journal:
New Trends in Qualitative Research

ISSN: 2184-7770

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: advances and challenges

Volume: 4

Type: Article

DOI: 10.36367/NTQR.4.2020.271-287 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: New Trends in Qualitative Research

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The article has as objective detects the values under the optics of the subjects of a net of social organizations, called Net IVG. The gathered data together to the subjects took as a base Schwartz's valuable Theory (2012) and the Theory of Cultural Values of Inglehart (1977, 1990, 1997), from the analysis of his speeches. The used methodology was of the exploratory study, qualitative, techniques of analysis orientated for the conceptual construction from data not structured when was called Grounded Theory, documentary analysis and observation not participant, through proceedings of analytical induction. The analysis of the qualitative information held as a support the analysis of the speech of the subjects and support of the software Atlas IT for definition of the personal values. It concludes that the subjects are affected by the socioeconomic conditions that influence theirs values. So the survival is a determinative factor when they were affected by the social, economic and political factors, being theirs values characterized like materialists, because they need support for the social transformation of the community.

Bibliographic References

  • Acs, Z. J., Boardman, M. C., & McNeely, C. L. (2013). The social value of productive entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ, 40, 785–796.
  • Agostini, M. R. (2016). Correlações entre diferentes terminologias no contexto do terceiro setor: Inovação social x empreendedorismo social x Empresa social x Negócio social. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Estudos Organizacionais, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, 4.
  • Albert, L. S., Dean, T. J., & Baron, R. A. (2016). From Social Value to Social Cognition: How Social Ventures Obtain the Resources They Need for Social Transformation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 289-311.
  • Amber-Montes, D. (2016). Mayores de 45 años en desempleo. Historias silenciadas y desafíos e la formación. Tesis Doctorales, Universidad de Granada, Espanha.
  • Alvord, S. H. L., Brown, D., & Letts, C. W. (2004, September). Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 260-282.
  • Austin, J, Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, orBoth?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
  • Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011, June). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5-6), 373-403.
  • Bernardino, S. J. Q. (2013). Iniciativas de empreendedorismo social no Terceiro Setor em Portugal: antecedentes, comportamentos e desempenho organizacionais. Tese de Doutoramento, Universidade Portucalense, Portugal. Recuperado em 20 de janeiro, 2018, de http://repositorio.uportu.pt/jspui/handle/11328/1045
  • Chaves Ávila, R., Monzón Campos, J. L., Pérez De Uralde, J. M., & Radrigán, M. (2013). La Economía Social En Clave Internacional. Cuantificación, Reconocimiento Institucional Y Visibilidad Social En Europa, Iberoamérica Y Norte De África. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 112, 122-150.
  • Chell, E. (2007). Social Enterprise and Entrepreneurship. Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 5-26.
  • Chell, E., Spence, L. J., Perrini, F., & Harris, J. D. (2016). Social Entrepreneurship and Business Ethics: Does Social Equal Ethical? J Bus Ethics, 133, 619–625.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de Pesquisa: método qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Porto Alegre: Artmed. Di Domenico, M. L., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010, July). Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703.
  • Flick, U. (2012). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa (3a ed.). Madrid/Es: Ed. Paideia. Hlady-Rispal, M., & Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing theWay in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 62–80.
  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
  • __________. (1990). El cambio cultural en las sociedades industriales avanzadas. Madrid, España: Siglo XXI.
  • __________. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. New Jersey/USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, R., & Díez Nicolas, J. (2005). Tendencias Mundiales de cambio em los valores sociales e políticos. Madri, ES: Los libros de Fundesco.
  • Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kraus, S., Filser, M., O’Dwyer, M., & Shaw, E. (2014). Social entrepreneurship: an exploratory citation analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 8, 275–292.
  • Kostetska, I., & Berezyak, I. (2014). Social entrepreunership as in innovative solution machanism of social problems of society. Manangement Theorya adn Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 36(3).
  • Lautermann, C. (2013). The ambiguities of (social) value creation: towards an extended understanding of entrepreneurial value creation for society. Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), 184-202.
  • Mair, J.; Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
  • Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Cardenas, J. (2012). Organizing for society: a typology of social entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 353–373.
  • Martinez, F., O’Sullivan, P., Smith, M., & Esposito, M. (2017). Perspectives on the role of business in social innovation. Journal of Management Development, 36(5), 681-695.
  • Martins, G. D. A., & Theófilo, C. R. (2009). Metodologia da Investigação Científica para Ciências Sociais (2a ed.). São Paulo/SP: Editora Atlas.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, Harper.
  • Medeiros, C. B., Machado, L. C. R., Pereira, L. C.de A., Costa, Í. C. de A., & Gomez, C. P. (2017). Inovação Social e Empreendedorismo Social: Uma Análise Sob a Perspectiva da Economia Solidária. Revista Gestão.Org, 15(1), 61-72.
  • Murphy, P. J., & Coombes, S. M. (2009, July). A Model of Social Entrepreneurial Discovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325-336.
  • Neiman, G., & Quaranta, G. (2014). Los estúdios de caso em la investigación sociológica. In I. V. Gialdino (Coord.). Estrategias de investigación cualitativa (Cap. 6, pp. 213-234). Barcelona, ES: Ed Gedisa.
  • Nicholls, A. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: New paradigms of sustainable social change. Oxford University Press, Oxford: OCDE.
  • Omorede, A. (2014). Exploration of motivational drivers towards social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(3), 239-26.
  • Parente, C., Costa, D., Santos, M., & Chaves, R. R. (2011, Maio). Empreendedorismo social: contributos teóricos para a sua definição. Anais do Encontro Nacional de Sociologia Industrial, das Organizações e do Trabalho Emprego e coesão social: da crise de regulação à hegemonia da globalização Lisboa, Lisboa, 14.
  • Penalva, C. V., Alaminos, A. C, Francés, F. J. G., & Santacreu, O. A. F. (2015). La investigación cualitativa: Técnicas de Investigación y Análisis con Atlas.Ti., Universidad de Cuenca/Cuenca, Equador: PYDLOS Ediciones.
  • Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Towards a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of management Review, 31(2), 56-65.
  • Poupart, J. et al. (2008). A pesquisa qualitativa: enfoques epistemológicos e metodológicos. Petrópolis/RJ: Vozes.
  • Rede IVG. (2017). Recuperado em 28 de outubro 2017, de http://www.redeivg.org.br/
  • Ribeiro, E., Borba, J. (2010, Junho). Participação e pós-materialismo na América Latina. Revista Opinião Pública, Campinas, 16(1), 28-63.
  • Sassmannshausen, S. P., & Volkmann, C. (2013). A bilbiometric based rewiev on Social Entrepreunership and its establishment as a Field of Research. Schumpeter Discussion Paper, (3).
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the context and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Org.). Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando: Academic Press.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo, & J. B. Porto (Eds.). Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 56-95). Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
  • Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663-688.
  • Stake, R. (2011). Pesquisa qualitativa: estudando como as coisas funcionam. Porto Alegre/RS: Penso.
  • World Values Survey Association. (2017). Aggregate File Producer. Madrid, Spain: Asep/JDS. Recuperado em 15 de janeiro, 2018, de www.worldvaluessurvey.org
  • Yin, R. K. (2016). Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Porto Alegre: Penso.