Claves del etiquetaje pragmático en el corpus CHILDHUM

  1. Ortega-Gilabert, Jose Antonio 1
  2. Timofeeva Timofeev, Larissa 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Journal:
Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

ISSN: 1576-4737

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: Etiquetaje pragmático de discursos humorísticos en la plataforma OBSERVAHUMOR.COM

Issue: 96

Pages: 59-71

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/CLAC.91591 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

In the context of research by the GRIALE group, one of the most recent lines of study has been the analysis of children’s verbal humour. Various projects here have focused on three age groups: 8, 10 and 12 years. The present study is based on the analysis of humorous written narratives that comprise the CHILDHUM corpus, currently under construction. The pragmatic tagging of samples drawn from CHILDHUM, over 1,000 in total for the three age groups, includes the usual sociolinguistic variables (age, sex, type of centre) but also the application of the system of humour markers and indicators (Ruiz Gurillo, 2012; Timofeeva Timofeev and Ruiz Gurillo, 2021) that act as linguistic devices in the creation of humour. An analysis of these markers and indicators will allow us to see the correlation between their use and the level of metalinguistic development of the participants. In addition, the pragmatic tagging of our corpus allows us to observe various psychosocial aspects, such as those relating to humour styles (Martin et al., 2003) and self-esteem (Pope et al., 1988; Hosogi et al., 2012), which in turn can yield linguistic data on the maturation processes of various human competencies which are in some way involved in the complex phenomenon of verbal humour.

Bibliographic References

  • Attardo, Salvatore (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi. org/10.1515/9783110887969
  • Bonilla-García, Miguel Ángel y López-Suárez, Ana Delia (2016). Ejemplificación del proceso metodológico de la teoría fundamentada. Cinta de moebio, (57), 305-315. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2016000300006
  • Charmaz, Kathy (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd Edition). Sage Publications.
  • Dey, Ian (1999). Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012214640-4/50011-5
  • Erikson, Erik Homburger (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. W.W. Norton and Company. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830140209
  • Erikson, Erik Homburger, y Erikson, Joan Mowat (1998). The life cycle completed (extended version). WW Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1209
  • Forabosco, Giovannantonio (2008). Is the Concept of Incongruity Still a Useful Construct for the Advancement of Humor Research?, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(1), 45-62. http://dx.doi. org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5
  • Gombert, Jean Emile (1992). Metalinguistic development. Wheatsheaf.
  • Hosogi, Mizuho, Okada, Ayumi, Fujii, Chikako, Noguchi, Keizou, y Watanabe, Kumi (2012). Importance and usefulness of evaluating self-esteem in children. Biopsychosocial Medicine, 6(9). http://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-6-9.
  • Kroger, Jane y Marcia, James E. (2011). The Identity Statuses: Origins, Meanings, and Interpretations. En Seth Schwartz, Koen Luyckx y Vivian L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 31-53). Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_2
  • Marcia, James E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of personality and social psychology, 3(5), 551. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
  • Marcia, James E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 9(11), 159-187.
  • Martin, Rod A. (2007). The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372564-6.X5017-5
  • Martin, Rod A. (2016). Sense of humor. En Shane J. Lopez (Ed.), Positive psychological assessment (2nd edition) (pp. 350-353). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-020
  • Martin, Rod, y Kuiper, Nicholas A. (2016). Three decades investigating humor and laughter: An interview with Professor Rod Martin. Europe’s journal of psychology, 12(3), 498-512. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1119
  • Martin, Rod A., Puhlik-Doris, Patricia, Larsen, Gwen, Gray, Jeanette, y Weir, Kelly (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
  • Mendiburo, Andrés y Páez, Darío (2011). Humor y cultura. Correlaciones entre estilos de humor y dimensiones culturales en 14 países. Boletín de psicología, 102, 89-105.
  • McGhee, Paul E. (1979). Humor: Its Origin and Development. W. H. Freeman.
  • McGhee, Paul E. (2002). Understanding and Promoting the Development of Children’s Humor. Kendall Hunt Publishing.
  • McGhee, Paul E. (Ed.). (1989). Humor and Children’s Development. Routledge.
  • Myhill, Debra (2012). The ordeal of deliberate choice: metalinguistic development in secondary writers. En Virginia Wise Berninger (Ed.), Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology (pp. 247- 274). Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Ortega Gilabert, Jose Antonio (en prensa). El humor como herramienta de gamificación en el aula de inglés como lengua extranjera. En La comunicación y el lenguaje entre las personas. Herramientas didácticas para el desarrollo de las sociedades. Dykinson.
  • O’Shannon, Dan (2012). What Are You Laughing at? A Comprehensive Guide to the Comedic Event. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Pope, Alice W., McHale, Susan M. y Craighead, W. Edward (1988). Self-esteem enhancement with children and adolescents. Pergamon Press.
  • Rivière, Ángel (2003). Metarrepresentación y semiosis. Médica Panamericana.
  • Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor (2012). La lingüística del humor en español. Arco/Libros.
  • Ruch, Willibald F. y Heintz, Sonja (2013). Humour styles, personality and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it? The European Journal of Humour Research, 1(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-96340
  • Semerari, Antonio y Dimaggio, Giancarlo (Eds.) (2008). Los trastornos de la personalidad. Modelos y tratamiento. Desclée de Brouwer.
  • Suls, Jerry M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. En Jeffery H. Goldstein y Paul E. McGhee (Eds.) The psychology of humor (pp. 81- 100). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9
  • Timofeeva, Larissa (2009). La desautomatización fraseológica: un recurso para crear y divertir. En Juan Luis Jiménez Ruiz y Larissa Timofeeva (Eds.), Estudios de Lingüística: Investigaciones lingüísticas del siglo XXI (pp. 249-271). Universidad de Alicante. https://doi.org/10.14198/elua2009.anexo3.10
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa (2014). El humor verbal en niños de Educación Primaria: desarrollo de la conciencia metapragmática. Feminismo/s, 24, 195-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/fem.2014.24.09.
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa (2016). Children Using Phraseology for Humorous Purposes: The Case of 9-to-10-year-olds. En Leonor Ruiz Gurillo (Ed.), Metapragmatics of Humor: Current Research Trends, (pp. 275-300). John Benjamins, Series IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.14tim
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa (2017). Metapragmática del humor infantil. CLAC, 70, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.56314.
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa (2018). Towards a Metapragmatic Description of Idiom Meaning. RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada, 56(1), 139-159. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832018000100139
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa (2021). Phraseological manipulation as a humour tool in 8–12-year-olds’ written narratives in Spanish. Studies in Psychology, 42(2), 462-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2021.1911056
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa (2022). La ficción interactiva en las narraciones humorísticas de niñas y niños de 8 a 12 años. En Leonor Ruiz Gurillo (Ed.), Interactividad en modo humorístico: géneros orales, escritos y tecnológicos, (pp. 133-154). Iberoamericana Vervuert. https://doi.org/10.31819/9783968693156-006
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa (2023). Fictional interaction in children’s humorous narratives. En Esther Linares Bernabéu (Ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts, (pp. 215-236). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ pbns.335.10tim
  • Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa, y Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor (2021). Marcas e indicadores humorísticos en las narraciones escritas de niños y niñas de 8, 10 y 12 años en español. Spanish in Context, 18(1), 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00069.tim
  • Verschueren, Jef (2000). Notes on The Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use. Pragmatics, 10(4), 439-456. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377.53
  • Waterman, Alan S. (1993). Developmental perspectives on identity formation: From adolescence to adulthood. En James E. Marcia, Alan S. Waterman, David R. Matteson, Sally L. Archer y Jacob L. Orlofsky (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research, (pp. 42-68). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8330-7_3
  • Walker, Diane y Myrick, Florence (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative health research, 16(4), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972
Data source: Dialnet