Actividades de offshoring de I+D y resultado innovador¿Se benefician más las empresas de servicios intensivas en conocimiento?

  1. Francisco José Callado Muñoz 1
  2. Marta Fernández Olmos 2
  3. Natalia María Utrero González 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  3. 3 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01460j859

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Ekonomiaz: Revista vasca de economía

ISSN: 0213-3865

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: Kibs y transferencia de conocimiento desde una perspectiva de internacionalización

Número: 102

Páginas: 150-171

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ekonomiaz: Revista vasca de economía

Resumen

La relación entre las actividades de offshoring y el resultado innovador en las empresas de servicios intensivas en conocimiento (KIBs) en comparación con el resto de empresas que no son KIBs sigue siendo un área de estudio poco analizada. Se ofrecen dos resultados importantes. En primer lugar, la actividad de offshoring es una importante fuente de innovación para todas las empresas. En segundo lugar, la relación offshoring-innovación difiere significativamente entre los dos grupos de empresas, siendo más positiva para las empresas no KIB. La actividad de offshoring es una fuente importante de innovación para las empresas, pero especialmente para las empresas que no pertenecen a KIB. Por lo tanto, nuestro trabajo contribuye al tema de offshoring-resultado innovador con nuevos conocimientos y resultados para las KIBs. Identifica qué empresas, KIBs o no KIBs, son las mejores para transformar las actividades de offshoring en resultados innovadores. Además, ayuda a descubrir la simultaneidad y las relaciones causales entre la innovación de productos y procesos, cuestiones que no se han considerado previamente en la literatura sobre las actividades de offshoring en las KIBs.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alcácer, J.; Chung, W. (2007): «Location strategies and knowledge spillovers», Management Science, 53 (5): 760-776.
  • Aron, R.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Jayanty, S.; Pathak, P. (2008): «Monitoring process quality in off-shore outsourcing: A model and findings from multi-country survey», Journal of Operations Management, 26(1): 303-321.
  • Basilioa, O.; Laredob, P.; Sánchez, P. (2019): «The organization of R&D activities in large knowledge intensive business services: The case of a «Big Four» consultancy», International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(03).
  • Bertrand, O.; Mol, M.J. (2013): «The antecedents and innovation effects of domestic and offshore R&D outsourcing: the contingent impact of cognitive distance and absorptive capacity», Strategic Management Journal, 34 (6): 751–776.
  • Bettencourt, L.a.; Ostrom, A.L.; Brown, S.W.; Roundtree, R.I. (2002): «Client coproduction in knowledge-intensive business services», California Management Review, 44: 100–28.
  • Braga, A.; Marques, C.S.; Serrasqueiro, Z. (2018): «Internationalisation Strategy of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services», Journal of Knowledge Economy, 9: 359–377.
  • Brandl, K.M. (2014): Process Perspectives on Service Offshoring, Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS).
  • Buckley, P.J.; Casson, M.C. (1976): The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: McMillian,
  • Buis, M.L. (2011): «The consequences of unob- served heterogeneity in a sequential logit model», Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29 (3): 247-262.
  • Choi, J.; Choi, J-Y. (2021): «The effects of R&D cooperation on innovation performance in the knowledge-intensive business services industry: focusing on the moderating effect of the R&D-dedicated labour ratio», Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(4): 396- 413.
  • Cohen, W.M.; Levinthal, D.A. (1990): «Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation», Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
  • Content, J.; Cortinovis, N.; Frenken, K.; Jordaan, J. (2022): «The roles of KIBS and R&D in the industrial diversification of regions», Annals of Regional Science, 68: 29– 64.
  • Damanpour, F.; Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001): «The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations», Journal of management studies, 38(1): 45-65.
  • Di Gregorio, D.; Musteen, M.; Thomas, D.E. (2009): «Offshore outsourcing as a source of international competitiveness for SMEs», Journal of International Business, 40: 969-988.
  • Díez-Vial, I.; Fernández-Olmos, M. (2015): «Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most?», The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1): 70-84.
  • Doloreuex, D.; Shearmur, R.; Rodríguez, M. (2016): «Determinants of R&D in Knowledge-Intensive Business Service firms», Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(4): 391-405.
  • Doloreuex, D.; Shearmur, R.; Rodríguez, M. (2018): «Internal R&D and external informa- tion in Knowledge-Intensive Business Service innovation: complements, substitutes or independent?», Technical and Economic Development of Economy, 24(6): 2255-2276.
  • Edvarsson, B.; Gustafsson, A.; Roos, I. (2005): «Service portraits in service research: a critical review», International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(1): 107-121.
  • Fariñas, J.; Lopez, A. (2011): «Medición de las innovaciones organizativas y efectos sobre la productividad: Evidencias sobre la empresa española», Papeles de Economía Española, 127, 120-139.
  • Farrell, D. (2005): «Offshoring: Value creation through economic change», Journal of Management Studies, 42: 675-683.
  • Gray, J.; Roth, A.; Leiblein, M. (2011): «Quality risk in offshore manufacturing: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry», Journal of Operations Management, 29(7-6): 737-752.
  • Grossman, G.; Helpman, E. (1991a): Innovation and growth in the global economy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Grossman, G.; Helpman, E. (1991b): «Quality Ladders and Product Cycles», Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 557-586
  • Hedlund, G. (1986): «The hypermodern MNC – a hierarchy?», Human Resource Management, 25(1): 9-35.
  • Horváth, K.; Rabetino, R. (2019): «Knowl- edge-intensive territorial servitization: regional driving forces and the role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem», Regional Studies, 53(3), 330-340.
  • Huergo, E.; Jaumandreu, J. (2004): «How does probability of innovation change with firm age?»,  Small Business Economics,  22(3): 193- 207.
  • Hullova, D.; Trott, P.; Don Simms, C. (2016): «Uncovering the reciprocal complementarity between product and process innovation», Research Policy, 45(5): 929-940.
  • Jensen, P.D.Ø. (2009): «A learning perspective on the offshoring of advanced services», Journal of International Management, 15(2): 181- 193.
  • Kedia, B.; Lahiri, S. (2007): «International outsourcing of services: A partnership model», Journal of International Management, 3(1): 22-37.
  • Kotabe, M.; Murray, J.Y. (1990): «Linking product and process innovations and modes of international sourcing in global competition: A case of foreign multinational firms», Journal of International Business Studies, 21(3): 383-408.
  • Lafuente, E.; Vaillant, Y.; Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2017): «Territorial servitization: Ex- ploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses», International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 19-28, https:// doi,org/10,1016/j,ijpe,2016,12,006
  • Levy, D. (2005): «Offshoring in the new global political economy», Journal of Management Studies, 42(3): 685–693.
  • Li, X.; Gagliardi, D.; Miles, I. (2019): «Innovation in R&D service firms: evidence from the UK», Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(6), 732-748.
  • Maister, D.; Lovelock, C.H. (1982): «Managing facilitator services», Sloan Management Review, 24(4): 19-31.
  • Manning, S.; Lewin, A.y.; Massini, S. (2008): «The globalization of innovation: A dynamic perspective on offshoring», Academy of Management Perspectives, 22 (3), 35-54.
  • Martinez-Noya, A.; García-Canal, E. (2011): «Technological capabilities and the decision to outsource/outsource offshore R&D services», International Business Review, 20: 264- 277.
  • Miles, I.; Kastrinos, N.; Bilderbeek, R.; Den Hertog, P.; Flanagan, K.; Huntink, W.; Bouman, M. (1995): «Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Their Role as Users, Carriers and Sources of Innovation», Report to the EC DG XIII Luxembourg: Sprint EIMS Programme.
  • Mol, M.J.; Brandl, K. (2018): «Bridging what we know: The effect of cognitive distance on knowledge-intensive business services produced offshore», International Business Review, 27(3), 669-677.
  • Molero, J.; García-Sánchez, A.; López-Castro, S. (2019): «El impacto de la financiación pública de la I+D+i en las estrategias tecnológicas y los resultados económicos de las empresas españolas», Monografía ICEI, Fundación Ramón Areces.
  • Nieto, M.J.; Rodriguez, A. (2011): «Offshoring of R&D: Looking abroad to improve innovation performance», Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 345-361.
  • Normann, R.; Ramirez, R. (1994): Designing interactive strategy – from value chain to value constellation, Chichester: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  • O’farrell, P.n.; Moffat, L.A.R. (1991): «An interaction model of business service production and consumption», British Journal of Management, 2 (4), 205-221.
  • Perri, A.; Scalera, V.G.; Mudambi, R. (2017): «What are the most promising sources of foreign knowledge? Innovation catch-up in the Chinese Pharmaceutical Industry», Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(2): 333-355.
  • Quinn, J.B. (1992): Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry, New York: Free Press.
  • Ramírez-Alesón, M.; Fernández-Olmos, M. (2019): «Intermediate imports and innovation performance: do family firms benefit more?», European Journal of Innovation Management.
  • Ramírez-Alesón, M.; Fernández-Olmos, M. (2021): «Which intermediate import source is best for innovation in MNEs?», Baltic Journal of Management.
  • Reus, T.H.; Lamont, B.T. (2009): «The dou- ble-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions», Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 1298-1316.
  • Rodan, S.; Galunic, C. (2004): «More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness», Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541-562.
  • Rodriguez, A.; Nieto, M.J. (2012): «The internationalization of knowledge-intensive business services: the effect of collaboration and the mediating role of innovation», The Service Industries Journal, 32(7): 1057-1075.
  • Rodríguez, M.; Doloreux, D.; Shearmur, R. (2017): «Variety in external knowledge sourcing and innovation novelty: Evidence from the KIBS sector in Spain», Technovation, 68: 35-43.
  • Rodríguez, A.; Nieto, M.a.; Santamaría, L. (2018): «International collaboration and innovation in professional and technological knowledge-intensive services», Industry and Innovation, 25(4), 408-431.
  • Roodman, D. (2011): «Estimating fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp», Stata Journal, 112: 159-206.
  • Seclen-Luna, J.P.; Barrutia-Güenaga, J. (2018): «KIBS and Innovation in Machine Tool Manufacturers, Evidence from the Basque Country», International Journal of Business Environment, 10(2): 112 -131.
  • Seclen-Luna, J.P.; Moyá-Fernández, P.; Barrutia, J.; Ferruci, L. (2022): «Innovation in Micro Firms Builders that Built Machine Tool: Effects of T-KIBS on Technological and Non-technological Innovations», Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24(1), 144-158.
  • Shearmur, R.; Doloreux, D.; Laperrière, A. (2015): «Is the degree of internationalization associated with the use of knowledge intensive or with innovation?», International Business Review, 24(3): 457-465.
  • Stabell, C.; Fjeldstad, Ø. (1998): «Configuring value for competitive advantage: On chains, shops, and networks», Strategic Management Journal, 19: 413-437.
  • Strambach, S. (2001): «Innovation Processes and the Role of Knowledge-Intensive Business Ser- vices (KIBS),» In Innovation Networks – Concepts and Challenges in the European Perspective, 53–68, Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.
  • Szulanski, G. (1996): «Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm», Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 27-43.
  • Tamayo, M.P.; Huergo, E. (2017): «Determinants of internal and external R&D offshoring: evidence from Spanish firms», Industry and Innovation, 24(2), 143-164.
  • Tojeiro-Rivero, D. (2021): «What effect does the aggregate industrial R&D offshoring have on you? A multilevel study», Journal of International Management, 100881.
  • Williamson, O.E. (1985): «Reflections on the new institutional economics», Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 141: 187- 195.
  • Zajac, E.J.; Olsen, C.P. (1993): «From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies», Journal of Management Studies, 30: 131-145.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet