Comunicación y participación onlinela evolución de los procesos participativos en entornos virtuales

  1. Mario Guilló 1
  2. José F. Mancebo-Aracil 1
  1. 1 Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios de Protocolo
Revista:
Miguel Hernández Communication Journal

ISSN: 1989-8681

Ano de publicación: 2017

Número: 8

Páxinas: 413-434

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.21134/MHCJ.V0I8.198 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Miguel Hernández Communication Journal

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

Internet and the ICT revolution initiated during the last century has been a key factor in the development of a new model of society, which seeks to promote values such as openness, transparency and especially civic engagement, both at global and local level. A quick review of current Internet developments can help us figure out the potential treasured by the numerous apps, social networks and online platforms that are flooding the Internet and playing a leading role in our devices. Many of these social networks are good examples of technology developments that could contribute to enhance new ways of networking, giving global scope to different social projects, movements, causes… However, a gap seems to exist between the theoretical potential and the actual performance of such networks when it comes to civic engagement. The objective of this paper is twofold: a) to analyse briefly how technology and Internet use have evolved in the last decades, and b) to try to establish a typology of the participation processes that take place in Social Networks, analysing some processes of change (social, economic, technological, cultural) that could influence how participation processes could evolve over the coming decades.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adler, R. P. y Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”?.Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236-253.
  • Atzori, L., Iera, A. y Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer networks, 54(15), 2787-2805.
  • Bajarin, T. (2014, January 13). “The Next Big Thing for Tech: The Internet of Everything”, Time. time.com/539/the-next-big-thing-for-techthe-internet-of-everything/
  • Bauman, Z. (2003). Modernidad líquida. Mexico D.F.: FCE.
  • Beck, U. (2006). La sociedad del riesgo: Hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.
  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. Nueva York: Basic Books.
  • Boyd, D. y Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  • Brandtzæg, P.B., Følstad, A. y Mainsah, H. (2012). Designing for youth civic engagement in social media. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference of Web Based Communities and Social Media (pp. 65-73). July 19-21, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Castells, M. (2005). La Era de la Informacion (vol.1): Economía, Sociedad y Cultura. La sociedad red. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Castells, M. (2006). Informacionalismo, redes y sociedad red: una propuesta teórica. In: Castells, M. La Sociedad Red: Una Visión Global (pp. 27-75). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age, 2nd Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Clark, J. D. (2012). Globalizing civic engagement: Civil society and transnational action. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Dearden, L. (2015, May 6). “French parliament approves 'intrusive' surveillance laws after Charlie Hebdo attack.” The Independent. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/french-parliament-approvesintrusive-surveillance-laws-after-charlie-hebdo-attack-10228206.html
  • DiNucci, D. (1999). Fragmented future. Print, 53(4), 2–32.
  • Gibson, C. (2006). Citizens at the center: A new approach to civic engagement. Washington, D.C.: Case Foundation.
  • Giusto, D., Iera, A., Morabito, G. y Atzori, L. (2010). The Internet of Things: 20th Tyrrhenian Workshop on Digital Communications. Nueva York: Springer.
  • Guilló, M. (2013). Futures, communication and social innovation: Using participatory foresight and social media platforms as tools for evaluating images of the future among young people. European Journal of Futures Research, 1(1) 1-17.
  • Haller, C. (2011). Micro-participation Sharing feedback more easily. Planning News, 37(8), 9-10.
  • Harrison, T. M. y Barthel, B. (2009). Wielding new media in Web 2.0: Exploring the history of engagement with the collaborative construction of media products. New Media y Society, 11(1-2), 155-178.
  • Howe, J. (2006). “The rise of crowdsourcing.” Wired. www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html
  • Krishnamurthy, B. y Cormode, G. (2008). “Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0.” First Monday, 13(6). www.ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125
  • Lakhani, K. R., y Von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. Research policy, 32(6), 923-943.
  • Lévy, P. (2000). Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
  • Livingstone, S., Couldry, N., y Markham, T. (2007). Youthful steps towards civic participation: Does the internet help? In B.D. Loader(ed.), Young citizens in the digital age: Political engagement, young people and new media (pp. 21-34). London: Routledge.
  • Malone, W. y Bernstein, S. (2015). Handbook of collective intelligence. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • O'Reilly, T. y Batelle, J. (2009). “Web squared: Web 2.0 five years on. Web 2.0 summit, 2009.” www.web2summit.com/web2009/public/schedule/detail/10194
  • Park, H. M. y Perry, J. L. (2008). Does internet use really facilitate civic engagement? In K. Yang y E. Bergrud, Civic engagement in a network society (237-269). Scottsdale: Information Age Publishing.
  • Peters, M. A., y Heraud, R. (2015). Toward a political theory of social innovation: collective intelligence and the co-creation of social goods. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 3(3), 7–23.
  • Poushter, J., Clarle, J., Bell, J. y Wike, R. (2015). “Internet seen as positive influence on education but negative influence on morality in emerging and developing nations”. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2015/03/Pew-Research-Center-TechnologyReport-FINAL-March-19-20151.pdf
  • Reinhardt, U. (2011). United dreams of Europe. Darmstadt: Primus Verlag
  • Sabatini, F., y Sarracino, F. (2014). Will Facebook save or destroy social capital. An Empirical Investigation into the Effect of Online Interactions on Trust and Networks. Brussels: EERI Research Paper Series.
  • Salo, A., y Cuhls, K. (2003). Technology foresight – past and future. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 22 (2-3), 79-82.
  • Schreiner, C., y Sjoberg, S. (2005). Empowered for action? How do young people relate to environmental challenges? In S. Alsop Beyond Cartesian dualism. Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science (pp. 53- 69).Dordrecht: Springer
  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media y Society, 6(3), 341-362.
  • Touraine, A. (1971). The post-industrial society. New York: Random House.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet