Effects on academic performance in secondary students according to the use of ICT

Referencias bibliográficas

• Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9401-9
• Alenezi, A. M. (2018). E-assessment through Tablets and Smart phones: An attitudinal assessment of teachers. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (11), 1-17. Recuperadode:https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/3292
• Aristovnik, A. (2012). The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency in selected EU and OECD countries: a non-parametric analysis. Available at SSRN 2187482. Recuperado de:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2187482
• Aristovnik, A. (2014). Development of the Information Society and Its Impact on the Education Sector in the EU: Efficiency at the Regional (NUTS 2) Level. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(2), 54–60.
• Baller, S., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2016). The global information technology report 2016. En World Economic Forum, Geneva(pp. 1–307). Recuperado de:http://www.aciem.org/home/images/Prensa/Newsletter/PDF_Notas_Prensa_Int_Gen_07_Jul_2016.pdf
• Baris, M. F. (2015). Future of E-Learning: Perspective of European Teachers. Eurasia Journal of MathemaTIC, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 421-429.https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1361ª
• Belcher, J. W. (2001). Studio physics at mit. Šaltinis internete.Recuperado de:http://web. mit. edu/8.02 t/www/802TEAL3D/visualizations/resources/PhysicsNewsLetter. Pdf
• Braak, J. V., & Kavadias, D. (2005). The influence of social-demographic determinants on secondary school children’s computer use, experience, beliefs and competence. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390500200192
• Breslow, L. (2010). Wrestling withpedagogical change: the TEAL initiative at MIT. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 23–29.•Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.-C., & others. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.
• Cinganotto, L., Panzavolta, S., Garista, P., Guasti, L., & Dourmashkin, P. (2016). TEAL as an innovative teaching model Insights from «Educational Avant-Garde» Movement in Italy. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(2), 115-126.
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning(Fourth edition). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.•Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational technology research and development, 42(2), 21–29.
• Cortina-Pérez, B., Gallardo-Vigil, M. Á., Jiménez-Jiménez, M. Á., & Trujillo-Torres, J. M. (2014). Digital illiteracy: a challenge for 21st century teachers / El analfabetismo digital: un reto de los docentes del siglo XXI. Cultura Y Educación, 26(2), 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2014.935108
• Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathemaTIC at university. Learning and Instruction, 8(5), 455–468.•De Bono, E. (1967). The use of lateral thinking. London: Jonathan Cape.
• Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011). The relationship between students’ exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3).
• Fombona Cadavieco, J., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2017). Posibilidades de utilización de la Geolocalización y Realidad Aumentada en el ámbito educativo. Educación XX1, 20(2), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19046
• Frederick, G. R., Schweizer, H., & Lowe, R. (2006). After the in-service course: Challenges of technology integration. Computers in the Schools, 23(1-2), 73-84.
• Fry, K. (2001). E-learning markets and providers: some issues and prospects. Education + Training, 43(4/5), 233-239.
• Gagné, R. M., & Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction(4th ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2010). Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Routledge.
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.•
• Kent, N., & Facer, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people’s home and school ICT use. Journal of computer assisted learning, 20(6), 440–455.
• Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of educational research, 61(2), 179–211.
• Kozma, R. B. (2003). Global perspectives. Learning & Leading with Technology, 31(2), 6.
• Kuhlemeier, H., & Hemker, B. (2007). The impact of computer use at home on students’ Internet skills. Computers & Education, 49(2), 460-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.004
• Lauman, D. J. (2000). Student Home Computer Use: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 196-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782309
• Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49(2), 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013
• Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181.
• Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ MathemaTIC Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8
• Liu, H. C., & Yen, J. R. (2014). Effects of Distance Learning on Learning Effectiveness. EURASIA Journal of MathemaTIC, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 575-580. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1218a•López-Gil, M., & Bernal Bravo, C. (2018). El perfil del profesorado en la Sociedad Red: reflexiones sobre la competencia digital de los y las estudiantes en Educación de la Universidad de Cádiz. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 11, 83-100. Recuperado de:https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/3265
• López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
• Lu, Z., Hou, L., & Huang, X. (2010). A research on a student-centred teaching model in an ICT-based English audio-video speaking class. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 6(3), 101.
• Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6
• Mayer, R. E. (2010). Learning with technology. En H. Dumont, D. Istance, F. Benavides, & OECD (Eds.), The nature of learning: using research to inspire practice(pp. 179-198). Paris: OECD.•McMahon, G. (2009). Critical thinking and ICT integration in a Western Australian secondary school. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 269–281.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: a systems view of online learning(3rd ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
• Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
• Oana, C., & Carmen, C. (2014). What do PISA 2012 results tell us about European students’ ICT access, ICT use and ICT attitudes? ADLRO. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-14-064
• OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de:http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2009-results-what-students-know-and-can-do_9789264091450-en
• OECD (Ed.). (2015). Students, computers and learning: making the connection. Paris: OECD.
• Orton-Johnson, K. (2009). ‘I’ve stuck to the path I’m afraid’: exploring student non-use of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 837-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00860.x
• Papanastasiou, E. C., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? The USA results from PISA. Journal of science education and technology, 12(3), 325–332.•Passey, D., Rogers, C., Machell, J., McHugh, G., & Allaway, D. (2004). The motivational effect of ICT on pupils. Department of Educational Research.
• Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, P., Muñoz-Fernández, G. A., & Luque-Vílchez, M. (2018). Estudio exploratorio sobre el panorama actual de la formación inicial del profesorado de secundaria en España. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (11), 169-184. Recuperado de:https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/2808
• Sayans-Jiménez, P., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Bernal-Bravo, C. (2018). Influence of family wealth on student reading performance in PISA. Revista de Educación, 380, 129-155. doi: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-380-375.
• Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C., & Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. D.F: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Sánchez, J. J. C., & Alemán, E. C. (2011). Teachers’ opinion survey on the use of ICT tools to support attendance-based teaching. Computers & Education, 56(3), 911-915.
• Sevillano, M.ª L., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2015). The impact of digital mobile devices in Higher Education. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 106-118.
• Simonson, M. R. (Ed.). (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: foundations of distance education(5th ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Song, H.-D., & Kang, T. (2012). Evaluating the Impacts of ICT Use: A Multi-Level Analysis with Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 132–140.
• Sulcic, V., & Lesjak, D. (2009). E-learning and study effectiveness. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(3), 40-47.•Torrecilla, F. J. M. (2012). Los modelos multinivel como herramienta para la investigación educativa. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 1(1). Recuperado de:http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/magis/article/view/3355
• Umek, L., Aristovnik, A., Tomazevic, N., & Kerzic, D. (2015). Analysis of Selected Aspects of Students’ Performance and Satisfaction in a Moodle-Based E-Learning System Environment. EURASIA Journal of MathemaTIC, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1495-1505. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1408a
• Vázquez-Cano, E. (2012). Mobile learning with Twitter toimprove linguistic competence at Secondary Schools. The New Educational Review, 29(3), 134-147.
• Vázquez-Cano, E. (2013). The Videoarticle: New Reporting Format in Scientific Journals and its Integration in MOOCs. Comunicar, 41, 83-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-08
• Vázquez-Cano, E. (2014). Mobile Distance learning with Smartphones and Apps in Higher Education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1-16. doi: 10.12738/est.2014.4.2012
• Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Dificultades del profesorado para planificar, coordinar y evaluar competencias clave. Un análisis desde la Inspección de Educación. Revista Complutense de Educación, 27(3), 1061-1083. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2016.v27.n3.4740
• Weert, T. J. van, Tatnall, A., & International Federation for Information Processing (Eds.). (2005). Information and communication technologies and real-life learning: new education for the knowledge society. New York: Springer.•Weinstein, C. E.,Ridley, D. S., Dahl, T., & Weber, E. S. (1989). Helping students develop strategies for effective learning. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 17–19.
• Whelan, R. (2008). Use of ICT in education in the South Pacific: findings of the Pacific eLearning Observatory. Distance Education, 29(1), 53–70.•Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers & Education, 50(4), 1558-1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.03.001
• Woessmann, L., & Fuchs, T. (2004). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school. Recuperado de:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=619101
• Zhang, D. (2016). How Does ICT Use Influence Students’ Achievements in Math and Science Over Time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. EURASIA Journal of MathemaTIC, Science & Technology Education, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a
• Zhong, Z.-J. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers & Education, 56(3), 736-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.016