Teaching evaluation questionnaire validation at Escuela Politécnica Nacionalapplying the method of Factor Analysis with extraction of principal components

  1. Tarquino Fabián Sánchez-Almeida
  2. Iván Patricio Sandoval-Palis
  3. Raquel Gilar-Corbi
  4. Juan Luis Castejón-Costa
  5. Diego Israel Salazar-Orellana
Revista:
Ingeniería e Investigación

ISSN: 0120-5609,  2248-8723

Ano de publicación: 2020

Volume: 40

Número: 1

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.15446/ING.INVESTIG.V40N1.79634 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Ingeniería e Investigación

Resumo

This work validates a teaching evaluation instrument applied to professors in engineering, sciences and higher technological level programs of the Escuela Politécnica Nacional, using the method of Factor Analysis with extraction of principal components. The database used for the research was previously examined and refined due to inconsistency, eg. outliers, out of range values, etc. The result of the method described above was a reduced survey of 15 items, which was obtained from an original study of 33 items. This new questionnaire clearly identifies the four main dimensions or aspects required: teaching development and planning, teacher-student relationship, evaluation, and a global assessment question. The reduction of the evaluation scale will allow to improve the process of integral teaching performance evaluation of the faculty at Escuela Politécnica Nacional, and this method could serve as a benchmark for the teaching evaluation process of other universities that belong to the higher education system of Ecuador.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alaminos, A., and Castejón, J. L. (2006). Elaboración, análisis e interpretación de encuestas, cuestionarios y escalas de opinión. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/20331
  • Aparicio, E. (2014). Validación de un cuestionario de evaluación de la docencia universitaria. (Doctoral thesis, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain) http://hdl.handle.net/10045/45168
  • Carvajal, A., Centeno, C., Watson, R., Martínez, M., and Sanz Rubiales, Á.. (2011). ¿Cómo validar un instrumento de medida de la salud?. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 34(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272011000100007
  • Casero Martínez, A. (2008). Propuesta de un cuestionario de evaluación de la calidad docente universitaria consensuado entre alumnos y profesores. Revista de Investigación educativa, 26(1), 25-44.
  • Consejo de Educación Superior. (2017). Reglamento de Carrera y Escalafón del Profesor e Investigador del Sistema de Educación Superior. https://n9.cl/4scm
  • Consejo de Educación Superior. (2018). Ley Organica De Educacion Superior, LOES. http://www.ces.gob.ec/documentos/Normativa/LOES.pdf
  • Gogol, K, Bunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., Fischhach, A., and Preckel, F. (2014). "My questionnaire is too long!" The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002
  • Harman, H. (1968) Modern Factor Analysis, (2nd Ed.)Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd. https://archive.org/details/ModernFactorAnalysis/mode/2up
  • Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
  • Lafontaine, M.-F., Brassard, A., Lussier, Y., Valois, P., Shaver, P.R., and Johnson, S.M. (2016). Selecting the best items for a short-form of the experiencies in close relationships questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000243
  • Marsh, H. W. (2007a). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry and J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence based perspective (pp. 319–383). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_9
  • Marsh, H. W. (2007b). Do university teachers become more effective with experience? A multilevel growth model of students’ evaluation of teaching over 13 years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.775
  • Montoya, O. (2015). Aplicación del análisis factorial a la investigación de mercados. Scientia Et Technica Scientia et Technica, Año XIII 35, 281–286.
  • Mortelmans, D. and Spooren, P. (2009). A revalidation of the SET37 questionnaire for student evaluations of teaching. Educational Studies - EDUC STUD. 35. 547-552. Mortelmans, D. and Spooren, P. (2009). A revalidation of the SET37 questionnaire for student evaluations of teaching. Educational Studies - EDUC STUD, 35, 547-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690902880299
  • Spooren, P., Brockx, B., and Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
  • Toland, M. D., and De Ayala, R. J. (2005). A Multilevel Factor Analysis of Students’ Evaluations of Teaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404268667
  • Uttl, B., White, C.A., and Gonzalez, D.W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
Fonte de datos: Dialnet