El discurso de las identidades en línea:El caso de Facebook

  1. Francisco Yus
Revista:
Discurso & Sociedad

ISSN: 1887-4606

Año de publicación: 2014

Título del ejemplar: Discurso e identidad en el ciberespacio hispano

Volumen: 8

Número: 3

Páginas: 398-426

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Discurso & Sociedad

Resumen

Identity is typically divided into personal and social. In previous research, I have proposed a three-fold distinction that includes an interactive identity which, to a certain extent, plays the part of “feeds” for personal and social identity. The importance of these three identities in the virtual world has varied depending on how the Internet has evolved and has imbricated (and hybridised) in our ordinary lives. Nowadays, social networking sites such as Facebook or Tuenti offer an ideal environment for identity shaping and users’ discourse, in its textual, visual or multimodal varieties, is essential to manage it. This article analyzes a number of Facebook entries, together with the discourse used therein, and also the impact that these entries and the comments they elicit have on users’ identities.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albaladejo, T. (2009). La poliacroasis en la representación literaria: Un componente de la retórica cultural. Castilla. Estudios de Literatura, 0, 1- 26.
  • Bazarova, N. N., Taft, J. G., Choi, Y. H. y Cosley, D. (2013). Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32 (2), 121-141.
  • Blumer, T. (2010). Face-to-face or Facebook: Are shy people more outgoing on Social Networking Sites? En N. Carpentier et al. (Eds.) Media and Communication Studies. Interventions and Intersections (pp. 201-214). Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
  • Bolander, B. y Locher, M. A. (2010). Constructing identity on Facebook: Report on a pilot study. En K. Junod y D. Maillat (Eds.) Performing the Self: SPELL. Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 24 (pp. 165-187). Tubingen: Narr.
  • Bosco, F. M. (2006). Cognitive pragmatics. En K. Brown (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2ª Ed.) (pp. 546-552). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Bucholtz, M. y Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7 (4-5), 585-614.
  • Chatora, A. T. (2010). Social Relationships and Identity Online and Offline: A Study of the Interplay between Offline Social Relationships and Facebook Usage by Rhodes University Students from Socially Disadvantaged Backgrounds. Tesis de Grado, Rhodes University.
  • Di Próspero, C. E. (2011). Autopresentación en Facebook: Un yo para el público. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad, 6 (3), 44-53.
  • Ellemers, N., Spears, R. y Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
  • Escandell-Vidal, V. (2004). Norms and principles. Putting social and cognitive pragmatics together. En R. Márquez-Reiter y M. E. Placencia (Eds.) Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish (pp. 347-371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Farquhar, L. (2013). Performing and interpreting identity through Facebook imagery. Convergence, 19, (4), 446-471.
  • Georgalou, M. (2010). Pathfinding’ discourses of self in social network sites. En R. Taiwo (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction (pp. 39-65). Hershey: IGI Global.
  • Gheorghiu, A. (2008). Building one’s self in the context of online interactions. En M. Barbovschi y M. Diaconescu (Eds.) Teenagers’ Actions and Interactions Online in Central and Eastern Europe. Potentials and Empowerment, Risks and Victimization (pp. 55-72). Cluj: Cluj University Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1987). La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
  • Hall, J. A. y Pennington, N. (2013). Self-monitoring, honesty, and cue use on Facebook: The relationship with user extraversion and conscientiousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1556-1564.
  • Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K, McCarthy, I. P. y Silvestre, B. A. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54, 241-251.
  • Koller, V. (2010). Analysing collective identity in discourse. Combining discourse-historical and sociocognitive approaches. Ponencia presentada en CADAAD 2010, Universidad de Lodz, Polonia.
  • Marwick, A. E. y boyd, D. (2010). I Tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13 (1), 114-133.
  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Monge Benito, S. y Olabarri Fernández, M. E. (2011). Los alumnos de la UPV/EHU frente a Tuenti y Facebook: Usos y percepciones. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 66.
  • Orihuela, J. L. (2008). Internet: la hora de las redes sociales. Nueva Revista 119, octubre de 2008, 57-62.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2012). A networked self. Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. En F. L. Lee, L. Leung, J. Qiu, y D. Chu (Eds.) Frontiers in New Media Research (pp. 207-221). Londres: Taylor & Francis.
  • Pérez Sabater, C. (2011). Cartas por Internet: Las implicaciones lingüísticas y estilísticas de los mensajes de correo electrónico y los comentarios del sitio de redes sociales Facebook. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 24, 111-130.
  • Seidman, G. (2014). Expressing the “true self” on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 367-372.
  • Sperber, D. y Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2ª Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Stets, J. E. y Burke, P. J. (2008). A sociological approach to self and identity. En M. Leary y J. Tangney (Eds.) Handbook of Self and Identity (pp. 128- 152). Londres: Guilford Press.
  • Tapia Frade, A., Gómez Nieto, B., Herranz de la Casa, J. M. y Matellanes Lazo, M. (2010). Los estudiantes universitarios ante las redes sociales: Cuestiones de uso y agrupación en estructuras elitistas o pluralistas. Vivat Academia, 113.
  • Tazghini, S. y Siedlecki, K. L. (2013). A mixed method approach to examining Facebook use and its relationship to self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 827-832.
  • Thompson, C. (2008). Brave new world of digital intimacy. The New York Times, 5 de septiembre de 2008, Magazine.
  • Toma, C. L. y Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39 (3), 321-331.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23 (1), 3-43.
  • Yus, F. (2001). Ciberpragmática. El uso del lenguaje en Internet. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Yus, F. (2002). Discourse and identity. En N. J. Smelser y P. B. Baltes (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 3728-3732). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Yus, F. (2007). Virtualidades reales. Nuevas formas de comunidad en la era de Internet. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Servicio de Publicaciones.
  • Yus, F. (2010). Ciberpragmática 2.0. Nuevos usos del lenguaje en Internet. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet