Microfoundations of strategic managementtoward micro-macro research in the resource-based theory

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Abell P., Felin T., Foss N. Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Manage. Decis. Econ. 2008, 29:489-502.
• Abell P., Felin T., Foss N. Causal and constitutive relations, and the squaring of Coleman's diagram: reply to Vromen. Erkenntnis 2010, 73:385-391.
• Aguinis H., Boyd B., Pierce C., Short J. Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: bridging micro and macro domains. J. Manage. 2011, 37:395-403.
• Aguinis H., O'Boyle E. Star performers in twenty-first-century organizations. Pers. Psychol. 2014, (in press).
• Aguinis H., Glavas A. What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J. Manage. 2012, 38:932-968.
• Andrews K. The Concept of Corporate Strategy 1971, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood.
• Ansoff H. Corporate Strategy 1965, McGraw Hill, New York.
• Argote L., Ren Y. Transactive memory systems: a microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1375-1382.
• Armstrong C., Shimizu K. A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. J. Manage. 2007, 33:959-986.
• Baer M., Dirks K., Nickerson J. Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strateg. Manage. J. 2013, 34:197-214.
• Bapuji H., Hora M., Saeed A. Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: examining the emergence of routines. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1586-1607.
• Barnard C. The Functions of the Executive 1938, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Barney J., Felin T. What are microfoundations?. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 2013, 27:138-155.
• Barney J., Ketchen D., Wright M. The future of resource-based theory: revitalization or decline?. J. Manage. 2011, 37:1299-1315.
• Bingham C., Eisenhardt K. Rational heuristics: the 'simple rules' that strategists learn from process experience. Strateg. Manage. J. 2011, 32:1437-1464.
• Blettner D., Chaddad F., Bettis R. The CEO performance effect: statistical issues and a complex fit perspective. Strateg. Manage. J. 2012, 33:986-999.
• Bridoux F., Stoelhorst J. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strateg. Manage. J. 2014, 35:107-125.
• Bromiley P. The Behavioral Foundations of Strategic Management 2005, Blackwell, Oxford.
• Bryk A., Raudenbush S. Hierarchical Linear Models 1992, Newbury Park, Sage.
• Buckley M.R., Hamdani M.R., Klotz A.C., Valcea S. Into the great wide open: bridging the micro-macro divide in the organizational sciences. Res. Methodol. Strateg. Manage. 2011, 6:31-68.
• Buyl T., Boone C., Matthyssens P. Upper echelons research and managerial cognition. Strateg. Org. 2011, 9:240-246.
• Cacciatori E. Resolving conflict in problem-solving: systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1559-1585.
• Chandler A. Strategy and Structure 1962, MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Chen G., Bliese P., Mathieu J. Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Org. Res. Methods 2005, 8:375-409.
• Coff R. Human assets and management dilemmas: coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1997, 22:374-402.
• Coff R. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: the resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Org. Sci. 1999, 10:119-133.
• Coff R., Kryscynski D. Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. J. Manage. 2011, 37:1429-1443.
• Cohen M. Perceiving and remembering routine action: fundamental micro-level origins. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1383-1388.
• Creswell J., Plano Clark V. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research 2011, Sage, Thousand Oaks. 2a ed.
• Crook T., Ketchen D., Combs J., Todd S. Strategic resources and performance: a meta-analysis. Strateg. Manage. J. 2008, 29:1141-1154.
• Cyert R., March J. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm 1963, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
• Dansereau F., Yammarino F., Kohles J. Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: some implications for theory building. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1999, 24:346-357.
• Delgado-García J., De La Fuente-Sabaté J. How do CEO emotions matter? Impact of CEO affective traits on strategic and performance conformity in the Spanish banking industry. Strateg. Manage. J. 2010, 31:562-574.
• Devinney T. Is microfoundational thinking critical to management thought and practice?. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 2013, 27:81-84.
• Eggers J., Kaplan S. Cognition and capabilities. A multi-level perspective. Acad. Manage. Ann. 2013, 7:293-338.
• Eisenhardt K., Furr N., Bingham C. Microfoundations of performance: balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Org. Sci. 2010, 21:1263-1273.
• Felin T. Cosmologies of capability, markets and wisdom of crowds: introduction and comparative agenda. Manage. Decis. Econ. 2012, 33:283-294.
• Felin T., Foss N. Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations. Strateg. Org. 2005, 3:441-455.
• Felin T., Foss N. Individuals and organizations: thoughts on a micro-foundations project for strategic management and organizational analysis. Res. Methodol. Strateg. Manage. 2006, 3:253-288.
• Felin T., Foss N. Organizational routines and capabilities: historical drift and course-correction toward microfoundations. Scand. J. Manage. 2009, 25:157-167.
• Felin T., Foss N. The endogenous origins of experience, routines, and organizational capabilities: the poverty of stimulus. J. Inst. Econ. 2011, 7:231-256.
• Felin T., Foss N. The (proper) microfoundations of routines and capabilities: a response to Winter, Pentland, Hodgson and Knudsen. J. Inst. Econ. 2012, 8:271-288.
• Felin T., Foss N., Heimeriks K., Madsen T. Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: individuals, processes, and structure. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1351-1374.
• Felin T., Hesterly W. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2007, 32:195-218.
• Felin T., Zenger T., Tomsik J. The knowledge economy: emerging organizational forms, missing microfoundations, and key considerations for managing human capital. Hum. Resour. Manage. 2009, 48:555-570.
• Floyd S., Sputtek R. Rediscovering the individual in strategy: methodological challenges, strategies and prospects. Res. Methodol. Strateg. Manage. 2011, 6:3-30.
• Foss N. Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach: an assessment and a re-evaluation. Ind. Corpor. Change 2003, 12:185-201.
• Foss N. The emerging knowledge governance approach: challenges and characteristics. Organization 2007, 14:29-52.
• Foss N. Alternative research strategies in the knowledge movement: from macro bias to micro-foundations and multi-level explanation. Eur. Manage. Rev. 2009, 6:16-28.
• Foss N. Micro-foundations for management research: what, why, and whither?. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 2010, 42:11-34.
• Foss N. Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. J. Manage. 2011, 37:1413-1428.
• Foss N., Heimeriks K., Winter S., Zollo M. A Hegelian dialogue on the micro-foundations of organizational routines and capabilities. Eur. Manage. Rev. 2012, 173-197.
• Foss N., Husted K., Michailova S. Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: levels of analysis, governance mechanisms and research directions. J. Manage. Stud. 2010, 47:455-482.
• Foss N., Lindenberg S. Micro-foundations for strategy: a goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 2013, 27:85-102.
• Friels M., Larty J. Replication of routines in organizations: existing literature and new perspectives. Int. J. Manage. Rev. 2013, 15:106-122.
• Garbuio M., King A., Lovallo D. Looking inside: psychological influences on structuring a firm's portfolio of resources. J. Manage. 2011, 37:1444-1463.
• Gavetti G. Cognition and hierarchy: rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development. Org. Sci. 2005, 16:599-617.
• Gavetti G. Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Org. Sci. 2012, 23:267-285.
• Gioia D., Price K., Hamilton A., Thomas J. Forging an identity: an insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Adm. Sci. Quart. 2010, 55:1-46.
• Gooderham P., Minbaeva D., Pedersen T. Governance mechanisms for the promotion of social capital for knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. J. Manage. Stud. 2011, 48:123-150.
• Gottschalg O., Zollo M. Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2007, 32:418-437.
• Hambrick D., Mason P. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1984, 9:193-206.
• Hansen N., Alewell D. Employment systems as governance mechanisms of human capital and capability development. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 2013, 24:2131-2153.
• Hitt M., Beamish P., Jackson S., Mathieu J. Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: multilevel research in management. Acad. Manage. J. 2007, 50:1385-1399.
• Hodgkinson G., Healey M. Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strateg. Manage. J. 2011, 32:1500-1516.
• Hodgson G. The mirage of microfoundations. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1389-1394.
• Hofmann D. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J. Manage. 1997, 23:723-744.
• Hofmann D. Issues in multilevel research: theory, development and analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2002, 247-274. Blackwell, Malden. S. Rogelberg (Ed.).
• Hofmann D., Griffin M., Gavin M. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions 2000, 467-511. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. K. Klein, S. Kozlowski (Eds.).
• Hoskisson R., Hitt M., Wan W., Yiu D. Theory and research in strategic management: swings of a pendulum. J. Manage. 1999, 25:417-456.
• Hough J. Business segment performance redux: a multilevel approach. Strateg. Manage. J. 2006, 27:45-61.
• Jepperson R., Meyer J. Multiple levels of analysis and the limitations of methodological individualisms. Sociol. Theory 2011, 29:54-73.
• Johnson G. Strategic Change and the Management Process 1987, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
• Kemper J., Schilke O., Brettel M. Social capital as a microlevel origin of organizational capabilities. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 2013, 30:589-603.
• Klein K., Kozlowski S. Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions 2000, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Kozlowski S., Chao G., Grand J., Braun M., Kuljanin G. Advancing multilevel research design: capturing the dynamics of emergence. Org. Res. Methods 2013, 16:581-615.
• Kozlowski S., Klein K. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions 2000, 3-90. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. K. Klein, S. Kozlowski (Eds.).
• Laamanen T., Wallin J. Cognitive dynamics of capability development paths. J. Manage. Stud. 2009, 46:950-981.
• Learned E., Christensen C., Andrews K., Guth W. Business Policy: Text and Cases 1965, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood.
• Lichtenthaler U., Ernst H., Hoegl M. Not-sold-here: how attitudes influence external knowledge exploitation. Org. Sci. 2010, 21:1054-1071.
• Lindenberg S., Foss N. Managing joint production motivation: the role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2011, 36:500-525.
• Lippman S., Rumelt R. The payments perspective: micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strateg. Manage. J. 2003, 24:903-927.
• Lippman S., Rumelt R. A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strateg. Manage. J. 2003, 24:1069-1086.
• Litchfield R., Gentry R. Perspective-taking as an organizational capability. Strateg. Org. 2010, 8:187-205.
• Loch C., Segupta K., Ahmad M. The microevolution of routines: how problem solving and social preferences interact. Org. Sci. 2013, 24:99-115.
• Mäkelä K., Sumelius J., Höglund M., Ahlvik C. Determinants of strategic HR capabilities in MNC subsidiaries. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1459-1483.
• March J., Simon H. Organizations 1958, Wiley, New York.
• Mathieu J., Chen G. The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. J. Manage. 2011, 37:610-641.
• McGahan A., Porter M. How much does industry matter, really?. Strateg. Manage. J. 1997, 18:15-30.
• Miller K., Pentland B., Choi S. Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1536-1558.
• Minbaeva D., Makela K., Rabbiosi L. Linking HRM and knowledge transfer via individual-level mechanisms. Hum. Resour. Manage. 2012, 51:387-405.
• Misangyi V., Elms H., Greckhamer T., Lepine J. A new perspective on a fundamental debate: a multilevel approach to industry, corporate, and business unit effects. Strateg. Manage. J. 2006, 27:571-590.
• Mollick E. People and process, suits and innovators: the role of individuals in firm performance. Strateg. Manage. J. 2012, 33:1001-1015.
• Molloy J., Chadwick C., Ployhart T., Golden S. Making intangibles "tangible" in tests of resource-based theory: a multidisciplinary construct validation approach. J. Manage. 2011, 37:1496-1518.
• Nelson R., Winter S. The Evolutionary Theory of the Firm 1982, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Newbert S. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strateg. Manage. J. 2007, 28:121-146.
• Nickerson J., Zenger T. Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strateg. Manage. J. 2008, 29:1371-1394.
• Obloj T., Sengul M. Incentive life-cycles: learning and the division of value in firms. Adm. Sci. Quart. 2012, 57:305-347.
• Paruchuri S., Eisenman M. Microfoundations of firm R&D capabilities: a study of inventor networks in a merger. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1509-1535.
• Payne G., Moore C., Griffis S., Autry C. Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. J. Manage. 2011, 37:491-520.
• Penrose E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm 1959, Wiley, New York.
• Pentland B., Feldman M., Becker M., Liu P. Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1484-1508.
• Ployhart R., Moliterno T. Emergence of the human capital resource: a multilevel model. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2011, 36:127-150.
• Powell T., Lovallo D., Fox C. Behavioral strategy. Strateg. Manage. J. 2011, 32:1369-1386.
• Reger R., Huff A. Strategic groups: a cognitive perspective. Strateg. Manage. J. 1993, 14:103-123.
• Rerup C., Feldman M. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Manage. J. 2011, 54:577-610.
• Rodenbach M., Brettel M. CEO experience as micro-level origin of dynamic capabilities. Manage. Decis. 2012, 50:611-634.
• Rumelt R. How much does industry matter?. Strateg. Manage. J. 1991, 12:167-185.
• Rumelt R., Schendel D., Teece D. Fundamental issues in strategy. Fundamental Issues in Strategy. A Research Agenda 1994, 9-47. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. R. Rumelt, D. Schendel, D. Teece (Eds.).
• Rynes S. Taking stock and looking ahead. Acad. Manage. J. 2005, 48:9-15.
• Salvato C. Capabilities unveiled: the role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Org. Sci. 2009, 20:384-409.
• Salvato C., Rerup C. Beyond collective entities: multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. J. Manage. 2011, 37:468-490.
• Schmalensee R. Do markets differ much?. Am. Econ. Rev. 1985, 75:341-351.
• Selznick P. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation 1957, Harper & Row, New York.
• Simon H. Administrative Behaviour 1945, Macmillan, New York.
• Spender J. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strateg. Manage. J. 1996, 17:45-62. (winter special issue).
• Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research 2010, Sage, Thousand Oaks. 2nd ed. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.).
• Teece D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manage. J. 2007, 28:1319-1350.
• Teece D. Dynamic capabilities: routines versus entrepreneurial action. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1395-1401.
• Turner K., Makhija M. The role of individuals in the information processing perspective. Strateg. Manage. J. 2012, 33:661-680.
• Turner S., Fern M. Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: the effects of experience and context change. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1407-1434.
• Vaara E., Whittington R. Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously. Acad. Manage. Ann. 2012, 6:285-336.
• Volberda H., Foss N., Lyles M. Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: how to realize its potential in the organization field. Org. Sci. 2010, 21:931-951.
• Vromen J. Micro-foundations in strategic management: squaring Coleman's diagram. Erkenntnis 2010, 73:365-383.
• Wang H., Wong K. The effects of managerial bias on employees' specific human capital investments. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1435-1458.
• Winter S. Capabilities: their origins and ancestry. J. Manage. Stud. 2012, 49:1402-1406.
• Winter S. Habit, deliberation and action: strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 2013, 27:120-137.