Construcción de conocimiento y desarrollo de una mirada profesional para la práctica de enseñar matemáticas en entornos en llínea

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Andriessen, J., Erkens, G., Van de Laak, C., Peters, N., & Coirier, N. (2003). Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative learning. En J. Andriessen, M. Backer & D. Suthers (eds.) Arguing to learn. confronting cognition in computer-supporter collaborative learning environment (pp. 79-115). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Ball, D.L., Thames, M.H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
• Borba, M.C., & Llinares, S. (2012). Online mathematics teacher education: overview on an emergent field of research. ZDMThe International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), doi 10.1007/s11858-012-0457-3.
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M.E. (2006). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathemaics professional development. Teaching and Teachers Education. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012.
• Callejo, M.L., Valls, J., & Llinares, S. (2007). Interacción y análisis de la enseñanza. Aspectos claves en la construcción del conocimiento profesional. Investigación en la Escuela, 61, 5-21.
• Clark, D.B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 343-374.
• Cobb, P.,Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003).Design Experiments. Educational Research,32(1), 9-13.
• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28.
• Eraut, M. (1996). Developing professional knowledgeand competence. London: The Falmer Press.
• Even, R. (2005). Integrating knowledge and practice in the development of providers of professional development for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(4), 343-357.
• Fernández, C., Valls, J., & Llinares, S. (2011). El desarrollo de un esquema para caracterizar la competencia docente mirar con sentido el pensamiento matemático de los estudiantes. En M. Marín et al (Eds.) Investigación en Educación Matemática XV, (pp. 351-360). SEIEM: Ciudad Real, España.
• Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2012). Learning to notice students’ mathematical thinking through online discussions. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 747-759. doi 10.1007/s11858-012-0425-y.
• Fortuny, J.M., & Rodríguez, R. (2012). Aprender a mirar con sentido: facilitar la interpretación de las interacciones en el aula. AIEM. Avances de Investigación en Educación matemática, nº 1, 23-37.
• Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2003). Exploring the practical rationality of mathematics teaching thorough conversations about videotaped episodes: The case of engaging student proving. For the learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 2-14.
• Hiebert, J., Morris, A.., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47-61.
• Jacobs, V.R., Lamb, L.L., & Philipp, R.A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.
• Kersting, N.B., Givvin, K.B., Sotelo, F.L., & Stigler, J.W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 172-181.
• Lerman, S., & Zehetmeier, S. (2008). Studies on face-to-face communities and networks of practising mathematics teachers. En T. Wood (Serie Editor) & K. Krainer (Volume Editor), International handbook of mathematics teacher education. Participants in mathematics teacher education: individuals, teams and networks, Vol. 3, (pp. 133-254). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
• Lin, P. (2005). Using research-based video-cases to help pre-service primary teachers conceptualize a contemporary view of mathematics teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 351-377.
• Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006).Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. En A. Gutierrez & P.Boero (eds.) Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education.Past, Present and Future (pp.429-460). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
• Llinares, S., & Olivero, F. (2008). Interactions and new forms of discourse in prospective mathematics teachers’ learning. The role of information and communication tools. En T. Wood & K. Krainer (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education. participants in mathematics teacher education: individuals, teams and networks, Vol. 3. (pp. 155-180). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2009).The building of pre-service primary teachers' knowledge of mathematics teaching: interaction and online video case studies. Instructional Science, 37(2), 247-271.
• Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2010).Prospective primary mathematics teachers' learning from online discussions in a virtual video-based environment.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 177-196.
• Llinares, S., Valls, J., & Roig, A.I. (2008). Aprendizaje y diseño de entornos de aprendizaje basado en videos en los programas de formación de profesores de matemáticas. Educación Matemática, 20(3), 31-54.
• Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice. The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge-Falmer.
• Morris, A. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 471–505.
• Penalva, M.C., & Llinares, S. (2011). Tareas matemáticas en la Educación Secundaria. En J.M. Goñi (Coord.) Didáctica de las Matemáticas, (pp. 27-51). Barcelona: GRAO.
• Penalva, M.C., Rey, C., & Llinares, S. (2011). Identidad y aprendizaje de estudiantes de psicopedagogía. Análisis de un contexto b-learning en didáctica de la matemática. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 248, 101-118.
• Penalva, M.C., Escudero, I., & Barba, D. (Eds.) (2006). Conocimiento, entornos de aprendizaje tutorización para la formación del profesorado de matemáticas. Construyendo comunidades de práctica. Grupo Proyecto Sur: Granada.
• Prieto, J.L., & Valls, J. (2010). Aprendizaje de las características de los problemas aritméticos elementales de estructura aditiva en estudiantes para maestro. Educación Matemática, 22(1), 57-85.
• Rey, C., Penalva, M.C., & Llinares, S. (2006). Aprendizaje colaborativo y formación de asesores en matemáticas: Análisis de un caso. Quadrante, XV, 95–120.
• Roig, A.I.,Llinares, S., & Penalva, M.C. (2011). Estructuras argumentativas de estudiantes para profesores en un entorno en línea. Educación Matemática, 23(3), 39-65.
• Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J.W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual videobased field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 123-140.
• Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: going beyond qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70.
• Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V.R., & Philipp, R.A. (Eds) (2010). Mathematics teacher noticing:
• Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York: Routledge.
• Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
• Star, J.R., & Strickland, S.K. (2007). Learning to observe: using video to improve pre-service teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107-125.
• Stein, M.K., Grover, B.W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
• Toulmin, S. (2003). Los usos de la argumentación. Barcelona: Ediciones Peninsula.
• Valls, J., Callejo, M.L., & Llinares, S. (2008). Dialecticas en el diseño de materiales curriculares y entornos de aprendizaje para estudiantes para maestro en el Área de Didáctica de la Matemática. Publicaciones, 38, 89-103.
• Van Es, E., & Sherin, M.G. (2002). Learning to notice: scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571-596.
• Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artefacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumental activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101.
• Wells, G. (2002, 2º ed.). Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press.
• Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups. A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28.