Andrea Bernabeu García-rekin lankidetzan egindako argitalpenak (27)

2024

  1. Impact of Group vs Individual Embryo Culture Strategies on Blastocyst and Clinical Outcomes

    Reproductive Sciences, Vol. 31, Núm. 6, pp. 1705-1711

  2. Luteal phase stimulation in double ovarian stimulation cycles is not affected by the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor genotype: Double ovarian stimulation is beneficial independently of the genotype at position 680 of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor

    Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, Vol. 34, Núm. 1, pp. 1-7

  3. Micronized natural progesterone (Seidigestan®) vs GnRH antagonists for preventing the LH surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (PRO_NAT study): study protocol of a randomized clinical trial

    Frontiers in Endocrinology, Vol. 15

  4. Perinatal and postnatal outcomes up to the third year of life after the transfer of mosaic embryos compared with euploid embryos

    Fertility and Sterility

  5. Random-start ovarian stimulation in an oocyte donation programme: a large, single-centre, experience

    Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol. 48, Núm. 1

  6. The impact of (very) young donor age on euploid rates: An analysis of 1831 trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with 24-chromosome NGS screening in oocyte donation cycles

    European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 297, pp. 59-64

2023

  1. Characterization of the Endometrial Microbiome in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure

    Microorganisms, Vol. 11, Núm. 3

  2. Conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation vs. luteal-phase stimulation in suboptimal responders: a randomized controlled trial

    F and S Reports, Vol. 4, Núm. 4, pp. 344-352

  3. Does mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in oocyte donors impact ovarian stimulation parameters or IVF outcomes for recipients?

    Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol. 46, Núm. 4, pp. 697-704

  4. Factors associated with embryo mosaicism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Vol. 40, Núm. 10, pp. 2317-2324

  5. IL-6/IL-10 and IL-1β/IL-4 ratios associated with poor ovarian response in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization

    European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 280, pp. 68-72

  6. Identification of novel candidate genes associated with meiotic aneuploidy in human embryos by whole-exome sequencing

    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Vol. 40, Núm. 7, pp. 1755-1763

  7. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing using the embryo spent culture medium: an update

    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 35, Núm. 4, pp. 294-299

2022

  1. Application of Machine Learning to Predict Aneuploidy and Mosaicism in Embryos From In Vitro Fertilization Cycles

    AJOG Global Reports, Vol. 2, Núm. 4

  2. Comparison of the assisted reproductive technology outcomes between conventional IVF and ICSI with donor oocytes in normozoospermic patients

    Human Fertility, Vol. 25, Núm. 1, pp. 56-62

  3. FSH receptor genotype and its influence on the results of donor ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa

    Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol. 45, Núm. 5, pp. 943-946

  4. Identification of new variants and candidate genes in women with familial premature ovarian insufficiency using whole-exome sequencing

    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Vol. 39, Núm. 11, pp. 2595-2605

  5. Identification of vaginal microbiome associated with IVF pregnancy

    Scientific Reports, Vol. 12, Núm. 1

  6. Vitrification does not affect birth weight: lessons from the oocyte donation model

    Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol. 45, Núm. 2, pp. 355-363

2021

  1. Characterization of the vaginal and endometrial microbiome in patients with chronic endometritis

    European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 263, pp. 25-32