Internet usage and digital divide among Spanish university students

  1. Martinez-Gras, Rodolfo 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Revista:
Media e Jornalismo

ISSN: 1645-5681 2183-5462

Año de publicación: 2009

Volumen: 14

Número: 8

Páginas: 17-25

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Media e Jornalismo

Resumen

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have altered and became an important part of habits and customs within all social environments. This is no less true for Universities. Since the mid 90s, the spreading of the Internet has caused changes in all aspects of University life. The ways in which we learn, teach, research, read and communicate have all changed; and of course, ICTs have also made accessing knowledge and information easier. In this sense, the main aim of this study was to gain a full understanding of the habits and uses (Teo, 2001) of university students as regards ICTs, with particular emphasis on their use of the Internet. The results of this study were obtained through an investigation between the students of the University of Alicante (Spain) during 2005. The research technique used to obtain data were an electronic survey, and the final sample consisted of 5.169 cases, from a population of 29.657 students. The results show that the effects of the digital divide are minimal within the university population and the digital illiteracy amongst students is minimal but in spite of that the majority of users only display passive uses of the Internet. A more plausible reason of these results would seem to be that large multinationals aim to control an open space such as the Internet, establishing their own use agenda and indicating how the Internet should be used and with which content.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Beer, D. & Burrows, R. (2007), “Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations”, Sociological Research Online 12
  • Castells, M. (2007), “Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society”, International Journal of Communication 1: 238-266.
  • Chinn, M. D. & Fairlie, R. (2007). “The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration”, Oxford Economic Papers 59: 16.
  • Dudek, H. & Krawiec, M. (2007), “The digital divide in the internet usage within enlarged European Union: a multivariate comparative analysis”, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies 2, 1: 23-36.
  • Espinar, E.; Frau, C.; González, M.; Lopez, C. & Martinez Gras, R. (2006), “The impact of Internet in the everyday life of spanish young people”, Investigação e Desenvolvimento Sócio-cultural
  • Hargittai, E. (2002), “Second – Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills”, First Monday 7
  • Martinez Gras, R. (2003), “Internet y la comunicación interna en las organizaciones. El caso de la Universidad de Alicante”, Journal of Digital Contents 1
  • Nasir, M. (2003), “Internet use by university academics: a bipartite study of information and communication needs”, Online Information Review 27: 225-237
  • Norris, P. (2001), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Roknuzzaman, M. (2006), “A survey of Internet access in a large public university in Bangladesh”, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology 2: 86-105
  • Underwood, J. (2007), “Rethinking the Digital Divide: impacts on student-tutor relationships”, European Journal of Education 42: 213–222
  • Teo, T. S. H. (2001), “Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11: 125-137
  • Van Dijk, J. & Hacker, K. (2003), “The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon”, The Information Society 19: 315-326
  • Warf, B. (2007), “Oligopolization of Global Media and Telecommunications and its Implications for Democracy”, Ethics, Place and Environment 10: 89-105