Histéresis y resiliencia en la vida cotidiana postpandemia en España

  1. Antonio Alaminos 1
  2. Paloma Alaminos-Fernández 2
  1. 1 Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas
    info

    Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas

    Madrid, España

  2. 2 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Revista:
Revista internacional de sociología

ISSN: 0034-9712

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 82

Número: 2

Páginas: 1-15

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/RIS.2024.82.2.22-095 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista internacional de sociología

Resumen

Daily life in Spain has experienced since the beginning of 2020 the impact of the restrictions established because of the coronavirus pandemic. Here we present a first empirical approach to the traces it has left in everyday life, measuring both resilience and hysteresis in two dimensions, emotional and behavioral. The survey “Barometer of June 2022” of the CIS is analyzed, studying how from the modifications produced in the forms of interpersonal greeting, the presence of hysteresis and resilience is observed, establishing its dependence on variables such as age, gender, and risk perceived by specifying a structural model. Age, gender, and perceived risk show significant explanatory value of the hysteresis and resilience phenomena. Finally, two types of hysteresis, emotional and behavioral, are confirmed, as well as the theoretical and empirical complementarity between resilience and hysteresis.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • A. Alaminos, A. Alaminos-Fernández. 2022a. “Impactos de la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la cohesión y el control social en España”. Pp. 209-235 en Cambios sociales en tiempo de pandemia, editado por J.F. Tezanos Tortajada. Madrid: CIS.
  • A. Alaminos, F. Francés, C. Penalva-Verdú, O. Santacreu. 2015. Introducción a los modelos estructurales en investigación social. Cuenca (Ecuador): PYDLOS. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/52627.
  • A. Alaminos, P. Alaminos-Fernández. 2022b. “L’incertezza europea in tempi di pandemia. Tra la salute e l’economia”. SocietàMutamentoPolitica 13(25): 9-21. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-14256.
  • Abrams, Dominic, Margaret Wetherell, Sandra Cochrane, Michael A. Hogg y John C Turner. 1990. “Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization”. British Journal of Social Psychology 29: 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x.
  • Alaminos, Antonio. 1992. Investigación, sociedades y desarrollo. En Juan Salcedo, Carlos Vicente Moya Valgañón, Alfonso Pérez-Agote Poveda y José Félix Tezanos Tortajada (Coors.) Escritos de teoría sociológica en homenaje a Luis Rodríguez Zúñiga. Madrid: CIS
  • Alaminos, Antonio. 1998. Teoría y práctica de la encuesta. Alicante: ECU. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/49236.
  • Alaminos, Antonio. 2005. Análisis de la realidad social: El método estructural de covarianza. Alicante: Obets Ciencia Abierta http://hdl.handle.net/10045/2295
  • Baldwin, Richard & Weder di Mauro, Beatrice. 2020. Economics in the time of COVID-19. London: CEPR Press. Consulted: June 1, 2021. https://cepr.org/publications/books-and-reports/economics-time-covid-19.
  • Bavel, Jay Van, Katherine Baicker y Paulo Boggio. 2020. “Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response”. Nature Human Behaviour 4:460–471. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z.
  • Berkowitz, Alan, D. 2005. “An overview of the social norms approach”. Pp. 193-214 in Changing the Culture of College Drinking: A Socially Situated Health Communication Campaign, edited by Lea Stewart y Linda Lederman. New York: Hampton Press.
  • Bicchieri, Cristina. 2006. The Grammar of Society. The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616037.
  • Bijl, Marja. 2020. “The Covid-19 crisis is exacerbating gender inequalities—but who cares?”. Social Europe. Consulta 10 de diciembre de 2020 (https://socialeurope.eu/the-covid-19-crisis-is-exacerbating-gender-inequalities-but-who-cares).
  • Bond, Robert M., Christopher J Fariss, Janson J. Jones, Adam D. Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime E. Settle y James H. Fowler. 2012. “A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization”. Nature 489(7415): 295-298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Cabanyes Truffino, Javier. (2010) “Resiliencia: una aproximación al concepto”. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental 3(4): 145-1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2010.09.003.
  • Cant, Sarah. 2017. “Hysteresis, social congestion and debt: towards a sociology of mental health disorders in undergraduates”. Social Theory & Health 16: 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-017-0057-y.
  • Casero-Ripollés, Andreu. 2020. “Impact of covid-19 on the media system. communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak”. El profesional de la información 29(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
  • Centola, Damon. 2011. “An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior”. Science 334: 1269-1272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207055.
  • Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Tezanos, Jose Félix, ed.). 2022. Cambios sociales en tiempos de pandemia. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Cialdini, Robert B. y Noah J. Goldstein. 2004. “Social influence: compliance and conformity”. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 591-621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
  • Cialdini, Robert B., Carl A. Kallgren, y Raymond R. Reno. 1991. “A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201-234.
  • Coleman, James. 1991. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  • Costa-Sánchez, Carmen y Xose López-García. 2020. “Comunicación y crisis del coronavirus en España. Primeras lecciones”. El profesional de la información 29(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.04.
  • De Bruin, W.B., & Bennett, D. (2020) “Relationships between initial COVID-19 risk perceptions and protective health behaviors: A national survey”. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 59(2): 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.001.
  • Dickie, Rachel, Susan Rasmussen, Rachel Cain, Lynn Williams y William MacKay. 2018. “The effects of perceived social norms on handwashing behaviour in students”. Psychology, Health & Medicine 23: 154-159.
  • Díez García, Ruben, Simone Belli, e Israel V. Márquez. 2020. “La COVID-19, pantallas y reflexividad social. Cómo el brote de un patógeno está afectando nuestra cotidianidad”. Revista Española de Sociología 29 (3): 759-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.49.
  • Ellemers, Naomi. 2017. Morality and the Regulation of Social Behavior. London: Routledge.
  • Ellemers, Naomi y van den Bos, Kess. 2012. “Morality in groups: on the social-regulatory functions of right and wrong.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6:878–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12001.
  • Elster, Jon. 2009. “Social Norms and the Explanation of Behavior”. Pp. 195-217 en The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, editado por P. Hedström y P. Bearman. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Elster, Jon. 1976. “A Note on Hysteresis in the Social Sciences”. Synthese 33: 371-3912. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485452.
  • ESPACOV-II. 2021. Estudio Social sobre la Pandemia de COVID-19. IESA-CSIC. https://www.iesa.csic.es/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Informe-ESPACOV-II-.pdf.
  • Estêvão, Pedro, Alexandre Calado y Luis Capucha. 2017. “Resilience: moving from a “heroic” notion to a sociological concept”. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas (85): 9-254. https://doi.org/10.7458/SPP20178510115.
  • Fernando Bruna, Matilde Massó e Isabel Neira. 2020. “¿Importa la cultura durante una pandemia? Una aproximación a la crisis española de la COVID-19”. Revista Española de Sociología 29(3): 747-758. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.48.
  • Fowler, Bridget. 2020. “Pierre Bourdieu on social transformation, with particular reference to political and symbolic revolutions”. Theory and Society 49: 439-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09375-z.
  • Galindo, Jorge. 2015. “Erving Goffman y el orden de la interacción”. Acta Sociológica 66: 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acso.2014.11.002.
  • García Calavia, Miguel Angel, Julián Cárdenas, Roberto L. Barbeito Iglesias. 2020. “Presentación del debate: Impactos sociales de la COVID-19: un nuevo reto para la sociología”. Revista Española de Sociología 29(3): 689-691. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.42.
  • Garfin, Dana Rose, Baruch Fischhoff, E. Alison Holman y Roxane Cohen Silver. 2021. “Risk perceptions and health behaviors as COVID-19 emerged in the United States: Results from a probability-based nationally representative sample”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27(4): 584-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000374.
  • Garmezy, Norman A. 1990. “Reflections on the future”. Pp. 527-534 en Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology, editado por J. Rolf, A. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, S. Weintraub.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gelfand, Michele, Jesse Harrington y Joshua C. Jackson. 2017. “The strength of social norms across human groups”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12: 800-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708631.
  • Gelfand, Michele et al. 2011. “Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study”. Science 332: 1100-1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754.
  • Glantz Meyer y Jeannette Johnson. 1999. Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations. New York: Plenum.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
  • Goffman, Erving. 1991. Los momentos y sus hombres. Barcelona: Paidos.
  • Gómez Martínez, Diana, y Angela Castrechini Trotta. 2021. “Medios de comunicación como agentes activos del conflicto: el caso de la Covid-19”. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional De Comunicación 53: 123-147. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2021.i53.07.
  • Graham, Hannah. 2020. “Hysteresis and the sociological perspective in a time of crisis”. Acta Sociologica 63(4): 450-452 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0001699320961814.
  • Greene, Joshua. 2013. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. London: Penguin Press.
  • Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. “The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment”. Psychological Review 108: 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.
  • Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Vintage.
  • Hardy, Clarisa. 2014. “Hysteresis.” Pp. 126-145 en Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, editado por M. Grenfell. London: Routledge.
  • Hudson, Bob. 2020. Varieties of Resilience. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ibba, Daniela 2009. “El saludo, una aproximación pragmática”. Interlingüística 18: 585-594.
  • Janz, Nancy K. y Marshall H. Becker. 1984. “The health belief model: A decade later”. Health Education Quarterly 11(1): 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981840110010.
  • Jepsen, Maria. 2021. “Good news for gender equality as we exit the Covid-19 crisis?” Social Europe. Consulta 1 de julio de 2022 (https://socialeurope.eu/good-news-for-gender-equality-as-we-exit-the-covid-19-crisis).
  • Joslyn, Susan, Gale M. Sinatra y Daniel Morrow. 2021. “Risk perception, decision-making, and risk communication in the time of COVID-19”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27(4): 579-583. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000407.
  • Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
  • Kahneman, Daniel y Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”. Econometrica 47(2): 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
  • Kitayama, Shinobu, Hyekyung Park, A. Timur Sevincer, Mayumi Karasawa y Ayse K. Uskul. 2009. “A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 236-255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015999.
  • Kraemer, Moritz, Chia-Hung Yang, Bernardo Gutierrez, Chieh-Hsi Wu, Brennan Klein, David M. Pigott, Open COVID-19 Data Working Group, Louis du Plessis, Nuno R. Faria, Ruoran Li, William P. Hanage, John S. Brownstein, Maylis Layan, Alessandro Vespignani, Huaiyu Tian, Christopher Dye, Oliver G. Pybus, Samuel V. Scarpino (2020) “The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China” Science 368, 493–497
  • Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth. 1993. Sobre la muerte y los moribundos. Barcelona: Grijalbo.
  • Linares, Francisco. 2007. “El problema de la emergencia de normas sociales en la acción colectiva. Una aproximación analítica”. Revista Internacional de Sociología 46: 131-160.
  • Lindell, Michael K. y Ronald W. Perry. 2012. “The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence”. Risk Analysis 32(4): 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x
  • Luckman, Ashley, Hossam Zeitoun, Andrea Isoni, Graham Loomes, Ivo Vlaev, Nattavudh Powdthavee y Daniel Read. 2021. “Risk compensation during COVID-19: The impact of face mask usage on social distancing”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27(4): 722-738. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000382.
  • Luo, Ye, Louise C.Hawkley, Linda J. Waite y John T. Cacioppo. 2012. “Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study”. Social Science & Medicine 74: 907-914. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028.
  • Luthar, Suniya y Gretta Cushing. 2002. “Measurement issues in the empirical study of resilience: An overview”. Pp. 129-160 Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations, editado por M.D. Glantz y J.L. Johnson. New York: Plenum.
  • Maddux, James y Rogers, Ronald (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9
  • Markus, Hazel R. y Shinobu Kitayama. 1991. “Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation”. Psychological Review 98: 224-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.
  • Martínez García, José Saturnino. 2017. “El habitus. Una revisión analítica”. Revista Internacional de Sociología 75(3). https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.3.15.115.
  • Masip, Pere, Sue Aran-Ramspott, Carlos Ruiz-Caballero, Jaume Suau, Ester Almenar y David Puertas-Graell. 2020. “Consumo informativo y cobertura mediática durante el confinamiento por el covid-19: Sobreinformación, sesgo ideológico y sensacionalismo”. El profesional de la información 29(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.12.
  • Masten, Ann, Karin Best y Norman Garmezy. 1990. “Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity”. Development and Psychopathology 2: 425-444.
  • Myrick, Jessica G. y Robin L. Nabi. 2017. “Fear arousal and health and risk messaging”. En Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.266.
  • Olsson, Lennart, Anne Jerneck, Henrik Thoren, Johannes Persson y David O’Byrne. 2015. “Why resilience is unappealing to social science: Theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience”. Science Advances 1(4): e14002177. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400217.
  • Oltra, Christian y Àlex Boso. 2020. “Lecciones aprendidas de la crisis del coronavirus: preparación y resiliencia social”. Revista Española de Sociología 29 (3): 769-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.50.
  • Painter, Marcus y Tiany Qiu. 2020. Political Beliefs affect Compliance with COVID-19 Social Distancing Orders. Consulta 1 de junio de 2021. https://voxeu.org/article/political-beliefs-and-compliance-social-distancing-orders.
  • Reinhardt, A. & Rossmann, C. 2021. “Age-related framing effects: Why vaccination against COVID-19 should be promoted differently in younger and older adults”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27(4): 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000378.
  • Reinholtz, N., Maglio, S.J. & Spiller, S.A. 2021. “Stocks, flows, and risk response to pandemic data”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27(4): 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000395.
  • Rinken, S., Domínguez-Álvarez, J.A., Trujillo, M., Lafuente, R., Sotomayor, R. & Serrano-del-Rosal, R. 2020. “Combined mobile-phone and social-media sampling for web survey on social effects of COVID-19 in Spain”. Survey Research Methods 14(2): 165-170. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7733.
  • Rodríguez-Andrés, Roberto. 2011. “La efectividad del uso del miedo como factor persuasivo en la comunicación de riesgos en las crisis sanitarias”. Revista de Comunicación y Salud 1(2): 33-6. https://doi.org/10.35669/revistadecomunicacionysalud.2011.1(2).33-46.
  • Roethig, Oliver. 2020. “Resilience in the corona crisis strongest where workers enjoy collective power”. Social Europe. Consulta 25 de abril de 2020. https://www.socialeurope.eu/resilience-in-the-corona-crisis-strongest-where-workers-enjoy-collective-power.
  • Rogers, Ronald W. y Steven Prentice-Dunn. 1997. “Protection motivation theory”. Pp. 113-132 en Handbook of health behavior research 1: Personal and social determinants, editado por D.S. Gochman. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Rutter Michael. 1990. “Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms”. Pp. 181-214 Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology, editado por J. Rolf, A.S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K.H. Nuechterlein y S. Weintraub. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752872.013.
  • Sabucedo, Jose Manuel, Mónica Alzate y Domenico Hur. 2020. “Covid-19 and the metaphor of war”. International Journal of Social Psychology 35(3): 618-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1783840.
  • San Martin, Alvaro, Marwan Sinaceur, Madi Amer, Steve Tompson, William Maddux y Shinobu Kitayama. 2018. “Self-assertive interdependence in Arab culture”. Nature Human Behaviour 2: 830-837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0435-z.
  • Schultz, P. Wesley, Jessica M. Nolan, Robert B. Cialdini, Noah J. Goldstein y Vladas Griskevicius. 2007. “The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms”. Psychological Science 18: 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.
  • Serrano Pascual, Araceli, María Paz Martín Martín y Carlos de Castro Pericacho. 2019. “Sociologizando la resiliencia. El papel de la participación socio-comunitaria y política en las estrategias de afrontamiento de la crisis”. Revista Española De Sociología 28(2). 227-247. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2018.75.
  • Serrano-del-Rosal, Rafael, Biedma-Velázquez, Lourdes, Domínguez, Juan Antonio, García-Rodríguez, María Isabel, Lafuente, Regina, Sotomayor, Rafaela, Trujillo, Manuel, Rinken, Sebastián (2020), “Estudio Social sobre la Pandemia del COVID-19 (ESPACOV)”, data file (v1), 2020. DIGITAL.CSIC. http://dx.doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/12517
  • Sparkman, Gregg, y Gregory M. Walton. 2017. “Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative”. Psychological Science 28: 1663-1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950.
  • Sparks, Paul, Richard Shepherd, Nicole Wieringa y Nicole Zimmermanns. 1995. “Perceived behavioural control, unrealistic optimism and dietary change: An exploratory study”. Appetite 24(3): 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(95)99787-3.
  • Strand, Micahel, y Omar Lizardo. 2016. “The hysteresis effect: Theorising mismatch in action”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 47(2): 164-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12117.
  • Tarter, Ralph E. y Michael Vanyukov. 1999. “Re-visiting the validity of the construct of resilience”. Pp. 85-100 en Resiliency and development: Positive life adaptations, editado por M.D. Glantz y J.L. Johnson. New York: Plenum.
  • Tena-Sánchez, Jordi y Ariadna Güell-Sans. 2011. “¿Qué es una norma social? Una discusión de tres aproximaciones analíticas”. Revista Internacional de Sociología (RIS) 69(3): 561-583. DOI: 10.3989/ris.2009.02.17.
  • Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Why We Cooperate. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Tooby, John y Leda Cosmides. 2010. “Groups in mind: the coalitional roots of war and morality”. Pp. 191-234 en Human Morality and Sociality: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives, editado por Høgh-Olesen H. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Triandis, Harry. 1995. Individualism And Collectivism. Nashville: Westview Press.
  • Tsai, Claire I. y Ying Zeng. 2021. “Risky but alluring: Severe COVID-19 pandemic influence increases risk taking”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27(4): 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000380.
  • Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. 1977. The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Ungar, Michael. 2008. “Resilience across Cultures”. The British Journal of Social Work 38(2): 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl343.
  • Vieites, Yan, Guilherme A. Ramos, Eduardo B. Andrade, Carlos Pereira y Amanda Medeiros. 2021. “Can self-protective behaviors increase unrealistic optimism? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27(4): 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000379.
  • Werner, Emmy y Ruth Smith. 1982. Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wood, Wendy. 2000. “Attitude change: persuasion and social influence”. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 539-570. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539.
  • Young, Brigitte. 2021. “Covid-19, women and the economy—it’s not all about care”. Social Europe. Consulta 1 de julio de 2022 (https://socialeurope.eu/covid-19-women-and-the-economy-its-not-all-about-care).
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet