Does digital transformation increase firms' productivity perception?the role of technostress and work engagement

  1. Beatriz Picazo Rodrıguez 1
  2. Antonio Jose Verdu-Jover 1
  3. Marina Estrada-Cruz 1
  4. Jose Maria Gomez-Gras 1
  1. 1 Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
    info

    Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

    Elche, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01azzms13

Revue:
European journal of management and business economics

ISSN: 2444-8494,  2444-8451

Année de publication: 2024

Volumen: 33

Número: 2

Pages: 137-156

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1108/EJMBE-06-2022-0177 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: European journal of management and business economics

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

Purpose– To understand how organizations, public or private, must increase their productivity perception (PP), independently of the sector. This article aims to analyze PP in the digital transformation (DT) process to determine how it is affected by technostress (TS) and work engagement (WE), two concepts that seem to be forces opposing PP. Design/methodology/approach– The authors use data from a questionnaire addressed to personnel in two organizations (public and private). The analysis applies partial least squares technique to the 505 valid responses obtained from these organizations. This analysis is based not on representativeness but on uniqueness. Findings–Theresultssuggestapositive,significant relationship between DT and PP. This articleintegrates DTanditseffectsonaspectsofpeople’shealth,PPandWE.Themodelthusincludesinteractionsoftechnology with human elements. In both business and administrative environments, PP is key to optimizing resources and survival of organizations. Research limitations/implications– DT processes are different and complex because every organization is different. The authors recommend expanding this study to other sectors in both spheres, public and private. Aligning the objectives of the institutions for aid with DT is also quite complicated. Practical implications– This study contributes to improving participating organizations. It also provides government institutions with a clear foundation from which to encourage actions that promote the health and WEoftheirworkforce without reducing productivity. In addition, this study adds novelty to the research line. Originality/value– The authors have deepened this line of research by developing fuller knowledge of the relationships among novel and necessary variables in organizations. The authors provide complementary, different and inspiring value in addressing this line of research.

Références bibliographiques

  • Ahearne, M., Srinivasan, N. and Weinstein, L. (2004), “Effects of technology on sales performance: progressing from technology acceptance to technology usage and consequences”, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 4, pp. 297-310, doi: 10.1080/08853134.2004.10749039.
  • Akingbola, K. and Van Den Berg, H.A. (2019), “Antecedents, consequences, and context of employee engagement in non-profit organizations”, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 39, pp. 46-74, doi: 10.1177/0734371X16684910
  • Alvarenga, A., Florinda, M., Radu, G. and Matias, J.C.O. (2020), “Digital transformation and knowledge management in the public sector”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 14, p. 5824, doi: 10.3390/ su12145824.
  • Atanasoff, L. and Venable, M.A. (2017), “Technostress: implications for adults in the workforce”, The Career Development Quarterly, Vol. 65 No. 4, pp. 287-381, doi: 10.1002/cdq.12111.
  • Ayyagari, R., Grover, V. and Russell, L.P. (2011), “Technostress: technological antecedents and implications”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 831-858, doi: 10.2307/41409963.
  • Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. and Schaufeli, W. (2003), “Dual processes at work in a call centre: an application of the job demands– resources model”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 393-417.
  • Bakker, A.B., Albrecht, S.L. and Leiter, M.P. (2011), “Key questions regarding WE”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 4-28, doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010. 485352.
  • Barley, S.R. and Leonardi, P.M. (2010), “What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing”, The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 1-51, doi: 10.5465/19416521003654160.
  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986), “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical”, Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1173-1182, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
  • Blacker, F.Y.B. C. (1986), “Alternative models to guide the design and introduction on the new information technology into work organizations”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 59, pp. 287-313, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00231.x.
  • Borst, R.T., Kruyen, P.M. and Lako, C.J. (2017), “Exploring the job demands–resources model of WE in government: bringing in a psychological perspective”, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 372-397, doi: 10.1177/0734371X17729870.
  • Borst, R.T., Kruyen, P.M., Lako, C.J. and de Vries, M.S. (2020), “Attitude, behavior, and job engagement performance outcomes: a comparative meta-analysis in the public, semi-public, and private sectors”, Public Personnel Administration Review, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 613-640.
  • Brod, C. (1984), Techno Stress: the Human Cost of the Computer Revolution, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Brougham, D.Y.H.J. (2017), “Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics and algorithms (STARA): employees perceptions of our future workplace”, Journal of Management and Organization, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 239-257, doi: 10.1017/jmo.2016.55.
  • Brown, Marie Maureen (2014), “Revisiting the IT productivity paradox”, The American Review of Public Administration, Vols 45-5, pp. 565-583, doi: 10.1177/0275074014523102.
  • Brynjolfsson (1993), “The productivity paradox of information technology”, Business Computing, Vol. 36 No. 12, available at: https://dl.acm.orThe g/doi/pdf/10.1145/163298.163309 Brynjolfsson, E., y and McAfee, A. (2017), Machine Platform Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future, Vol. 2, W.W. Norton & Company, C, New York, pp. 32-47.
  • Camarena, L. and Fusi, F. (2022), “Always connected: technology use increases technostress among public managers”, The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 154-168, doi: 10.1177/02750740211050387.
  • Camelo, C., Garcıa Cruz, J., Garcıa Cruz, E., Sousa Ginel, E. and Valle, R. (2011), “The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 1442-1463, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.561960.
  • Chang, A., McDonald, P. and Burton, P.M. (2010), “Methodological choices in work-life balance research 1987 to 2006: a critical review”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 21 No. 13, pp. 2381-2413, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2010.516592
  • Chin, W.W. (1998), “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling”, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (295-358), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Christ-Brendem€uhl, S. and Schaarschmidt, M. (2020), “Frontline backlash: service employees deviance from digital processes”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 117, pp. 378-388, doi: 10.1108/JSM03-2019-0125.
  • De Bem Machado, A., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D. and Lanzalonga, F. (2022), “Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review”, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 320-338.
  • Diamantopoulos, A. and Winklhofer, H.M. (2001), “Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 269-277.
  • Dillman, D.A.C.L.M. and Parsons, N.L. (2009), “Scalar question design for web surveys”, Sociological Research and Methods, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 393-425, doi: 10.1177/0049124108330004.
  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Tinkler, J. (2006), “New public management is dead — long live digital-era governance”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16, doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057.
  • El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N. and Harb, E. (2022), “Has the intensity of the digital transformation of countries affected the performance of IT companies during Covid-19?”, Journal of Decision Systems. doi: 10.1080/12460125.2022.2094528.
  • Emery, F.E. and Trist, E. (1960), “Socio-technical systems”, Management Sciences Models and Techniques, Vol. 2, pp. 83-297.
  • Falk, R.F. and Miller, N.B. (1992), A Primer for Soft Modelling, University of Akron Press, Akron, OH.
  • Fornell, C. and Cha, J. (1994), “Partial least squares”, Advanced Marketing Research Methods, Vol. 407, pp. 52-78, doi: 10.1142/9789814407724_0003.
  • Fountain, J. (2001), Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  • Geisser, S. (1975), “The predictive sample reuse method with applications”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 70 No. 350, pp. 320-328, doi: 10.2307/2285815.
  • Giorgi, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Mucci, N. and Leal-Rodrıguez, A.L. (2022), “The dark side and the light side of technology-related stress and stress related to workplace innovations: from artificial intelligence to business transformations”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, p. 1248, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031248
  • . Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2014), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Hanaysha, J. (2016), “Testing the effects of employee engagement, work environment, and organizational learning on organizational commitment”, Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 229, pp. 289-297, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.139.
  • Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. and Keyes, L.M. (2003), “Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: a review of the Gallup studies”, in Keyes”, in C.L.M. and Haidt, J. (Eds), Flourishing: The Positive Person and the Good Life, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, Chapter 9, pp. 205-224, doi: 10.1037/10594-009.
  • Hausberg, J.P., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Pakura, S. and Vogelsang, K. (2019), “Research streams on digital transformation from a holistic business perspective: a systematic literature review and citation network analysis”, Journal of Business Economics, Vol. 89 No. 8, pp. 931-963.
  • Henseler, R., Ringle, C.M. and Sinkovics, R.R. (2009), “The use of Partial Least Squares path modeling in international marketing”, inAdvances in International Marketing, Emerald JAI Press, Bingley, doi: 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
  • Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D.W., Ketchen, D.J., Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M. and Calantone, R.J. (2014), “Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: comments on R€ onkk€o & Evermann”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 182-209, doi: 10.1177/1094428114526928.
  • Hofmann, S. and Ogonek, N. (2018), “Different but still The Same? How public and private sector organizations deal with new digital competences”, Journal of E-Government, Vol. 16, pp. 127-135.
  • Jansen, T., Van Den Brink, G. and Kole, J. (2010), Professional Pride: A Powerful Force, Boom, Amsterdam.
  • Jorgenson, D.W., Ho, S., Mun and Stiroh, K.J. (2008), “A retrospective look at the U.S. productivity growth resurgence”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 3-24, available at: https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.22.1.3
  • Karr-Wisniewski, P. and Lu, Y. (2010), “When more is too much: operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 1061-1072, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.008.
  • La Torre, G., De Leonardis, V. and Chiappeta, M. (2020), “Technostress: how does it affect the productivity and life of an individual? Results of an observational study”, Public Health, Vol. 189, pp. 60-65, doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.013.
  • Langelaan, S., Bakker, A.B., Van Doornen, J.P., Shaufeli, W.B. (2006), “Burnout and WE: do individual differences make a difference?”, Vol. 40, pp. 521-532, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.009, available at: www.elsevier.como/locate/paid
  • Madden, L., Mathias, B.D. and Madden, T.M. (2015), “In good company: the impact of perceived organizational support and positive relationships at work on turnover intentions”, Management Research Review, Vol. 38, pp. 242-263, doi: 10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0228.
  • Mahraz, M.I., Benabbou, L. and Berrado, A. (2019), “A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM Society, pp. 917-931.
  • McElheran, K. (2015), “Do market leaders lead in business process innovation? The case(s) of e-business adoption”, Management Science, Vol. 61 No. 6, pp. 1197-1216, doi: 10.1287/mnsc. 2014.2020.
  • Mergel, I., Edelmann, N. and Haug, H. (2019), “Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 4, 101385, ISSN 0740-624X, doi: 10. 1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.
  • Molino, M., Cortese, C.G. and Ghislieri, C. (2020), “Promoting the acceptance of technology and labor commitment in industry 4.0: from personal resources to information and training”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17 No. 7, p. 2438.
  • Mooi, E.A. and Sarstedt, M. (2011), A Concise Guide to Market Research: the Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Springer, Berlin.
  • Moore, J.E. (2000), “One road to turnover: an examination of work exhaustion in technology professional”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 141-168, doi: 10.2307/3250982
  • Okolo, B., Honigmann, P., Sharma, N., Popp, U., Msallem, B., Thieringer, F.M. (2018), “Patient-specific surgical implants made of 3D printed PEEK: surgical material, technology and scope”, BioMed Research International, Vol. 018, 4520636, doi: 10.1155/2018/4520636.
  • Parkin, M. (2000), Economics, 5th ed., Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, MA.
  • Pierce, J.L., Gardner, D.G., Dunham, R.B. and Cummings, L.L. (1993), “Moderating effects of organization-based self-esteem on employee role, condition, and response relationships”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 5 No. 36, pp. 271-288, doi: 10.2307/256523.
  • Pilat, D. and Criscuolo, C. (2018), “The future of productivity”, Policy Quarterly, Vol. 14, doi: 10.26686/ pq.v14i3.5081.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., McKenzie, S.B. and LeeNathan, J.Y. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879-903, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2012), “Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 539-569, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
  • Ragazou, K., Passas, I. and Sklavos, G. (2022), “Investigating the strategic role of digital transformation path of SMEs in the era of COVID-19: a bibliometric analysis using R”, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 18, 11295.
  • Ragu-Nathan, T.S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B.S. and Tu, Q. (2008), “The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 417-433.
  • Riedl, R., Kindermann, H., Auinger, A. and Javor, A. (2013), “Computer breakdown as a stress factor during task completion under time pressure: identifying gender differences based on skin conductance”, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 420169, p. 8.
  • Ringle, C.M., Henseler, J. and Sarstedt, M. (2015), “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 115-135, doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
  • Ritzer, G. (2005), Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Salanova, M. (2003), “Trabajando con tecnologıas y afrontando el tecnoestres: el rol de las creencias de eficacia”, Revista de Psicologıa del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, Vol. 19, pp. 225-247.
  • Salanova, M. and Cifre, E. (1999), The “Techno-Stress” Process and Strategies for its Prevention. (II), National Institute of Safety and Hygiene at Work (I.N.S.H.T.), Vol. 2, pp. 4-12.
  • Salanova, M. and Rodrıguez-Sanchez, A.M. (2014), “Flowing together: a longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups”, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 148 No. 4, pp. 435-455, doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.806290.
  • Salanova, M., Cifre, E., Martınez, I.M. and Llorens, S. (2007), Case by Case in the Prevention of Psychosocial Risks: WONT Methodology for a Healthy Organization, Lettera Publications, Vol. Cap No. 2, pp. 47-71.
  • Salo, M., Pirkkalainen, H., Chua, C.E.H. and Koskelainen, T. (2022), “Formation and mitigation of technostress in the personal use of IT”, Mis Quarterly, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 1073-1108.
  • Schaufeli, W.B. and Bakker, A.B. (2010), “Defining and measuring WE: bringing clarity to the concept”, WE: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, Vol. 12, pp. 10-24, doi: 10.4324/ 9780203853047.
  • Schaufeli, W.B. and Salanova, M. (2007), “Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: burnout and WE, and their relationship with efficacy beliefs”, Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, Vol. 20, pp. 177-196, doi: 10.1080/10615800701217878.
  • Schwarzm€ uller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D. and Welpe, I. (2018), “How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership”, Management Revue, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 114-138, doi: 10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-114.
  • Spector, P.E. (1988), “Development of the work locus of control scale”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 335-340, doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00470.x.
  • Stadin, M., Nordin, M., Brostrom, A., Hanson, L.L.M., Westerlund, H. and Fransson, E.I. (2016), “Information and communication technology demands at work: the association with job strain, effort-reward imbalance and self-rated health in different socio-economic strata”, Int Arch Occupy Environ Health, Vol. 89, pp. 1049-1058, available at: https://doi. org/10.1007/s00420-0161140-8
  • Stone, M. (1974), “Cross validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 111-147, doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x. Syed, Z.J.W. and Jamal, W. (2012), “Universalist perspective of HRM and organizational performance: a meta-analytic study”, International Bulletin of Business Administration, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 45-57.
  • Tao, Z., Zhan-Zhong, S., Yi-Rong, S. and Neng-Jun, C. (2022), “Enterprise digital transformation and production efficiency: mechanism analysis and empirical research”, Economic ResearchEkonomska Istrazivanja, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 2781-2792, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1980731.
  • Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C.L. and Stich, J.F. (2017), “Techno-stress trifecta- techno eustress, techno distress and design: theoretical guidelines and a research agenda”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 6-42, doi: 10.1111/isj.12169. Telefonica.com (2022), available at: https://www.telefonica.com/es/sala-comunicacion/blog/ladigitalizacion-de-las-empresas-repercute-hasta-un-25-en-su-productividad/
  • Tian, G., Wang, J., Zhang, Z. and Wen, Y. (2019), “Self-efficacy and work performance: the role of work commitment”, Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, Vol. 47 No. 12, pp. 1-7.
  • Trist, E. (1981), “The evolution of socio-technical systems; a conceptual framework and action research program”, Occasional paper, no. 2, June, Ontario Quality of working Life Centre, Canada.
  • Trist, E.L. and Bamforth, K.W. (1951), “Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal-getting: an examination of the psychological situation and defenses of a work group in relation to the social structure and of coal-getting: an examination of the psychological situation”, Human Relations, Vol. 4 No. 3, doi: 10.1177/001872675100400101.
  • Trittin-Ulbrich, H., Scherer, A.G., Munro, I. and Whelan, G. (2021), “Exploring the dark and unexpected sides of digitalization: toward a critical agenda”, Organization, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 8-25, doi: 10.1177/1350508420968184.
  • Tu, Q., Wang, K. and Shu, Q. (2005), “Computer-related technostress in China”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 77-81, doi: 10.1145/1053291.1053323.
  • Union of Mutual Societies of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security of Spain (2019), “Mcss”, Vol. 23 No. 267, available at: https://www.seg-social.es/wps/wcm/connect/wss/219f51a3-a5594883-b155-0f29589f0247/267_TOMOþXXIII_19_compressed.pdf?MOD5AJPERES
  • Veglianti, E. (2023), “Digital transformation and working setting in (smart) public organizations”, Working Environment and Digital Transformation, Springer, Cham, pp. 93-110.
  • Verhoef, P.C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J.Q., Fabian, N. and Haenlein, M. (2021), “Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 122, pp. 889-901.
  • Walton, T., Zhang, W., Li, L., Tam, D.P. and Szoastak, J.W. (2019), “The mechanism of copying nonenzymatic templates with imidazole activated nucleotides”, A Journal of the German Chemical Society, Vol. 58 No. 32, pp. 10812-10819, doi: 10.1002/anie.201902050.
  • Wilke, P.K., Gmelch, W.H. and Lovrich, N.P. Jr. (1985), “Stress and productivity: evidence of the inverted U function”, Public Productivity Review, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 342-356, doi: 10.2307/ 3379944.
  • Yerkes, R.M. and Dodson, J.D. (1908), “The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habitformation”, Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, Vol. 18, pp. 459-482.
  • Yue, Li and Wang, F. (2022), “Challenge stressors from using social media for work and changeoriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of public service motivation and job involvement”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 39 No. 4, 101741, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022. 101741.
  • Zainun, N., Johari, J. and Adnan, Z. (2020), “Technostress and commitment to change: the moderating role of Internal communication”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 43 No. 15, pp. 1327-1339, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1672180.
La source de données: Dialnet