The impact of revenue-sharing contracts on parallel shipping alliances

  1. Nerja Esteve, Adrián
  2. Sánchez Romero, María Dolores 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Transport Economics and Management

ISSN: 2949-8996

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 1

Páginas: 77-85

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.TEAM.2023.06.004 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Transport Economics and Management

Resumen

In this paper, we explore the effect of revenue-sharing contracts between ports and shipping lines to counter the negative effects of parallel shipping alliances. We consider a vertical structure approach formed by port-shipping line chains, where ports are considered the upstream market, while shipping lines are the downstream market. Then, we propose the vertical integration of both chains as a solution to the loss of welfare because of the shipping alliance. We find that when ports may influence the downstream markets, welfare increases, and it is a proper ports response that port horizontal cooperation

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alphaliner, Alphaliner top 100, 2023.
  • Álvarez-SanJaime, (2013), Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 51, pp. 67, 10.1016/j.tre.2012.12.008
  • Álvarez-SanJaime, (2013), Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 51, pp. 50, 10.1016/j.tre.2012.12.009
  • Álvarez-SanJaime, (2015), Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 80, pp. 291, 10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.011
  • Franc, (2010), J. Transp. Geogr., 18, pp. 557, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.004
  • Ghorbani, (2022), Marit. Econ. Logist., pp. 1
  • R. Itoh, A. Zhang, Shipping Alliances and Market Volatility under an Unexpected Shock, Available at SSRN 4464511, 2023.
  • Ju, (2023), Marit. Policy Manag., pp. 1, 10.1080/03088839.2023.2180549
  • Liu, (2019), Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 128, pp. 333, 10.1016/j.tre.2019.06.009
  • Nerja, (2023), Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 167, 10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.019
  • T. Notteboom, The Relationship between Seaports and the Intermodal Hinterland in Light of Global Supply Chains: European Challenges, 2009.
  • Notteboom, (2017), J. Transp. Geogr., 64, pp. 158, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.09.002
  • Panayides, (2011), Res. Transp. Econ., 32, pp. 25, 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.06.008
  • Park, (2001), Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 35, pp. 865, 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00027-8
  • Shi, (2022), Front. Eng. Manag., pp. 1
  • Tan, (2018), Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 110, pp. 90, 10.1016/j.tre.2017.12.010
  • Tang, (2018), Marit. Bus. Rev., 10.1108/MABR-08-2017-0023
  • UNCTAD, Review of Maritime Transport 2022, 2022.
  • Wang, (2019), Transp. Policy, 81, pp. 184, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.013
  • Xiao, (2014), J. Geogr. Geol., 6, pp. 145, 10.5539/jgg.v6n2p145
  • Xing, (2018), Marit. Policy Manag., 45, pp. 260, 10.1080/03088839.2017.1405290
  • Zhang, (2012), Econ. Transp., 1, pp. 15, 10.1016/j.ecotra.2012.08.001
  • Zhang, (2006), Int. J. Ind. Organ., 24, pp. 287, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.04.005
  • Zheng, (2021), Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 153, 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102429
  • Zhu, (2019), Marit. Policy Manag., 46, pp. 920, 10.1080/03088839.2019.1594426