Utilidad percibida de la robótica en el currículum de Educación Primaria para el alumnado con Necesidades Específicas de Apoyo Educativo

  1. Lorenzo Lledó, Gonzalo 1
  2. Lorenzo-Lledó, Alejandro 1
  3. Lledó Carreres, Asunción 1
  4. Andreu Cabrera, Eliseo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Alicante
Journal:
Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

ISSN: 1575-0965

Year of publication: 2024

Issue Title: Cultura histórica, multiperspectiva y análisis de iconos culturales en la formación del profesorado de historia

Volume: 27

Issue: 2

Pages: 111-122

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/REIFOP.603741 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

Abstract

The use of technological tools is having a significant growth in various fields of knowledge. In the educational field, robotics has emerged, which has a great versatility to respond to the diverse needs of the students present in the classrooms. The objective of the research was to implement a training action in the Degree in Primary Education and to analyze the perceived usefulness of robotics for students with SEN. A quantitative approach was adopted with a non-experimental comparative-casual design. The participants were 170 students of the Degree of Teacher in Primary Education of the subject "Attention to Specific Educational Needs". A questionnaire consisting of 28 items was designed ad hoc, considering as dimensions the objectives, competencies and areas of the Primary Education curriculum. The results showed that 64.1% of the students perceive robotics as totally useful for developing daily habits of active, autonomous and healthy mobility. Significant differences were also found in perceptions according to previous knowledge of a robot, gender and age. It can be concluded that the innovation implemented in initial teacher training was satisfactory.

Bibliographic References

  • Arquero, J., Hassal, T., Joyve, J. & Donoso, J. (2007). Accounting students and Communication Apprehension: A Study of Spanish and U.K. Students. European Accounting review, 16(2), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701391337
  • Balpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachadran, A., Scassellati, B. & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 21(3),1-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954
  • Barrera, N. (2015). Uso de la robótica educativa como estrategia didáctica en el aula. Praxis & Saber, 6(11), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.3582
  • Banaeian, H. & Gilanlioglu, I. (2021). Influence of the NAO robot as a teaching assistant on universitystudents’ vocabulary learning and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6130
  • Beltrán, J.A., Ramírez, M.O. & García, R.I. (2017). Propiedades métricas de un instrumento de autoreporte para medir la competencia informacional de maestros de primaria. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 147–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i50.10
  • Bishop, L., Maris, A., Dogramadzi, S. & Zook, N. (2019). Social robots: The influence of human and robot characteristics on acceptance. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral RobBisotics, 10(1), 346-358. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0028
  • Bisquerra, R. (2009). Metodología de la investigación Educativa. Muralla: Madrid.
  • Cano, S., Díaz-Arancibia, J., Arango-López, J., Libreros, J. & García, M. (2023). Design path for a social robot for emotional communication for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Sensors, 23(11), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115291
  • Cardoso, M. & Guijarro, J. (2020). Estudio comparativo-causal sobre el éxito en la vida escolar del profesorado de lengua extranjera en formación. Onomázein, 6(1), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.ne6.12
  • Cuperman, D. & Verner, I.M. Fostering Analogical Reasoning Through Creating Robotic Models of Biological Systems. J Sci Educ Technol,28, 90–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9750-4
  • Crompton, H., Gregory, K. & Burke, D. (2018). Humanoid robots supporting children’s learning in an early childhood setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 911-927. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12654
  • Evripidou, S., Georgiou, K., Doitsidis, L., Amanatiadis, A. A., Zinonos, Z. & Chatzichristofis, S. (2020). Educational robotics: Platforms, competitions and expected learning outcomes. IEEE Access, 8(1), 219534-219562. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042555
  • Fernández-Cruz, F. & Fernández-Díaz, M. (2016). Los docentes de la generación y sus competencias digitales. Comunicación, 46(1), 97-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C46-2016-10
  • George, D. y Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed). boston: Allyn & bacon
  • Gisbert, M., González, J. & Esteve, F. (2016). Competencia digital y competencia digital docente: una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación. Tecnología Educativa, 0, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite2016/257631
  • Gómez-García, A. & Espín-García, L. (2023). Diferencias de edad en los accidentes de trabajo. Estudio transversal en asalariados del Ecuador. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 29(2), 444-455. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i2.39987
  • Hall, J., Tritton, T., Rowe, A., Pipe, A., Melhuish, C. & Leonards, U. (2014). Perception of own and robot engagement in human–robot interactions and their dependence on robotics Knowledge. Robotics and autonomous system,62(3), 392-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.09.012
  • Hassall, T., Joyce, J., Ottewill, R., Arquero, J. and Donoso, J. (2000). Communication apprehension in UK and Spanish business and accounting students", Education + Training, 42(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005351
  • Hein, M. & Nathan-Roberts, D. (2018). Socially Interactive Robots Can Teach Young Students Language Skills, a Systematic Review. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621249
  • Hwang, G., Xie, H., Wah, B. & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles, and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  • Islam, M., Hasan, M. & Deowan, S. (2023). Robot-Assisted Training for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review. J Intell Robot Syst, 108(41), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-023-01872-9
  • Ilio, T., Maeda, R., Ogawa, K., Yoshikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H., Suzuki, K., Aoki, T., Maesaki, M. & Hama, M. (2018). Improvement of Japanese adults' English-speaking skills via experiences speaking to a robot. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12325
  • Jiménez-Hernández, D., González-Calatayud, V., Torres-Soto, A., Martínez, A. & Morales, J. (2020). Digital Competence of Future Secondary School Teachers: Differences According to Gender, Age, and Branch of Knowledge. Sustainability, 12(22),1-16 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229473
  • Jung, M., Martelaron, M. & Hinds, P. (2015). Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations. En HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp.229-236). AMC Digital Library: USA.
  • Krauss, R. & Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication competence as function of age. Child Development, 40(1), 255-266. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1127172
  • Kutuk, G., Putwain, D. W., Kaye, L. K., & Garrett, B. (2022b). Relations between gender stereotyping and foreign language attainment: The mediating role of language learners' anxiety and self-efficacy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12446
  • Lindsay, S. & Hounsell, K. (2017). Adapting a robotics program to enhance participation and interest in STEM among children with disabilities: a pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(7), 694-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1229047
  • Manso, J., Matarranz, M. & Valle, J. M. (2019). Estudio supranacional y comparado de la formación inicial del profesorado en la Unión Europea. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 23(3), 15-33. doi: 10.30827/profesorado.v23i3.9697
  • Meiirbekov, S., Balkibekov, K., Jalankuzov,Z. & Sandygulova, A. (2016). “You win, I lose”: Towards adapting robot's teaching strategy. En 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), (pp. 475-476). IEEE: USA.
  • Noyes, J. & Frankish, C. (2007). A review of speech recognition applications in the office. Behaviour & Information Technology 8(6), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449298908914575
  • Pérez-Vázquez, E., Lorenzo, G., Lledó, A. & Lorenzo-Lledó, A. (2020). Evolution and Identification from a bibliometric perspective of the use of robots in the intervention of Children with ASD. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 83-114.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09415-8
  • Pozo, S., López, J., Fernández, M. & López, J. (2020). Análisis correlacional de los factores incidentes en el nivel de competencia digital del profesorado. Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, 23(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.396741
  • Perula, R., García, J., Balaguer, C. & Salichs, M (2016). Developing Educational Printable Robots to Motivate University Students Using Open-Source Technologies. J Intell Robot Syst 81, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-015-0205-3
  • Reich-Stiebert, N. & Eyssel, F. (2017). (Ir)relevance of Gender? On the Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Learning with a Robot. En HRI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 166-176). ACM. Digital Library: USA
  • RUTE (2008). Declaración de la Junta Directiva de RUTE ante los nuevos títulos universitarios para la formación del profesorado de Educación Infantil, Primaria y Secundaria. Disponible en https://goo.gl/NjorRY
  • Robaczewski, A., Bouchard, J. & Bouchard, K. (2021). The Specific case of NAO. Internantional Journal of Social Robotics, 13(1), 795-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00664-7
  • Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K. (2014). Tactile interactions with Humanoid robot: Novel Play Scenario Implementations with Children with Autism. International Journal of Social robotics, 6(1), 397-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0228-0
  • Sarceda-Gorgoso, M., Santos-González, M. & Rego-Agraso, L. (2020). Las competencias docentes en la formación inicial del profesorado de educación secundaria. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 24(3), 402-421.DOI: 10.30827/PROFESORADO.V24I3.8260
  • Su, J., Yang, W. y Zhong, Y. (2023). Influences of gender and socioeconomic status on children’s use of robotics in Early Childhood education. Early Education and Development, 34(4), 910-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2078617
  • Taylor, L., Hume, R. & Welsh, N. (2010). Labelling and Self-esteem: The Impact of using Specific vs. Generic Labels. Educational Psychology, 30 (2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903494478
  • Tung, F. (2011). Influence of Gender and Age on the Attitudes of Children towards Humanoid Robots. En International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) (pp. 637-646). Springer: Alemania
  • Vásquez, M., Núñez, P. & Cuestas, J. (2023). Competencias digitales docentes en el contexto de COVID-19. Un enfoque cuantitativo. Pixel Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, 67(1), 155-185. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.98129.
  • Williams, D., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M. & Lai, G. (2007). Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782505
  • Yngve, M., Ekbladh, E., Lidström, H. & Hemmingsson, H. (2023). Information and communication technology to improve school participation among upper secondary school students with special educational needs. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30(3), 311-321. doi:10.1080/11038128.2021.1998610
Data source: Dialnet