Algoritmos de valoración de riesgoContexto, Concepto y Limitaciones

Referencias bibliográficas

• ANGWIN, J. ET AL. (2016): “Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks.”, ProPublica, 23 May. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (Último acceso: 10/23).
• ANEESH, A. (2009): “Global Labor: Algocratic Modes of Organization”, en: Sociological Theory, Vol. 27(4), pp. 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01352.x
• ARADAU, C. / BLANKE, T. (2017): “Politics of prediction: Security and the time/space of governmentality in the age of Big Data”, en: European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 20(3), pp. 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016667623
• BARRY J. (2016): “Bio-fuelling the hummer? Transdisciplinary thoughts on techno-optimism and innovation in the transition from unsustainability”, en: BYRNE E. / MULLALLY G. / SAGE C. (eds.), Transdisciplinary perspectives on transitions to sustainability, Routledge, Abingdon.
• BECCARIA, C. (1998/1764): De los delitos y las penas, Alianza Editorial, Madrid.
• BEER, D. (2016): “How should we do the history of Big Data?”, en: Big Data & Society, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135
• BENBOUZID, B. (2019): “To predict and to manage. Predictive policing in the United States”, en: Big Data & Society, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719861703
• BENNETT MOSES, L. / CHAN, J. (2014): “Using Big Data for Legal and Law Enforcement Decisions: Testing the New Tools”, en: University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 37 (2), 2014, pp. 643-678.
• BERK, R.A. / BLEICH, J. (2013): “Statistical procedures for forecasting criminal behavior: A comparative assessment”, en Criminology & Public Policy, Vol. 12(3), pp. 513-544.
• BOYD, D. / CRAWFORD, K. (2012): “Critical questions for Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon”, en: Information, Communication and Society, Vol. 15(5), pp. 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
• BRANDARIZ GARCÍA, J.A. (2016), El modelo gerencial-actuarial de penalidad. Eficiencia, riesgo y sistema penal, Dykinson, Madrid.
• BRAYNE, S. (2017): “Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing”, en: American Sociological Review, Vol. 82(5), pp. 977-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865
• BRENNAN, T. / OLIVER, W.L. (2013): “The emergence of machine learning techniques in criminology”, en Criminology & Public Policy, Vol.12(3), pp. 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12055
• CAPLAN, J.M. ET AL. (2021): “Data-Informed and Place-Based Violent Crime Prevention: The Kansas City, Missouri Risk-Based Policing Initiative”, en: Police Quarterly, Vol. 0(0), pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211003205
• CARUANA, R. / NICULESCU-MIZIL, A. (2006) “An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms using different performance metrics”, en Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143865
• CHAN, J. / BENNETT MOSES, L. (2016): “Is Big Data challenging criminology?”, en: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 20(1), pp. 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615586614
• DANAHER, J. (2016): “The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation”, en: Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 29(3), pp. 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1
• DANAHER, J. ET AL. (2017): “Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence”, en: Big Data and Society¸ pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554
• DIAKOPOULOS N. (2014): “Algorithmic-Accountability: The investigation of Black Boxes Report”, en: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University, pp. 1-37. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8ZK5TW2
• DIETER, M.S. (2013): Política Criminal Atuarial. A Criminología do fim da Història, Revan, Rio de Janeiro.
• DORON, C.O. (2016): “The experience of “risk”. Genealogy and transformations”, en BURGESS, A. / ALEMANNO, A. / ZINN, J.O., (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Risk Studies, Routledge, New York, pp. 17-26.
• KEHL, D. / GUO, P. / KESSLER, S. (2017): “Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System: Assessing the Use of Risk Assessments in Sentencing”, en: Responsive Communities Initiative, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School, pp. 1-37.
• DOUGLAS, M. (1994): (1994), Risk and Blame. Essays in cultural theory, Routledge, London.
• DUWE, G. / KIM, K. (2017): “Out with the old and in with the new? An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms to predict recidivism”, en: Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 28(6), pp. 570–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415604899
• ECKHOUSE, L. ET AL. (2019): “Layers of Bias. A Unified Approach for Understanding Problems with Risk Assessment”, en: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 46 (2), pp. 185-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818811379
• ERICSON, R.V. / DOYLE, A. (2003): “Risk and Morality”, en: ERICSON, R. / DOYLE A. (eds.) Risk and Morality, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 1-10.
• FEELEY, M.M. / SIMON, J. (1992): “The New Penology: Notes on the emerging srategy of corrections and its implications”, en Criminology, Vol. 30(4), pp. 449-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
• FEELEY, M.M. / SIMON, J. (1994): “Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law”, en: NELKEN, D. (ed.), The Futures of Criminology, Sage, London, pp. 173-201.
• FERGUSON, A.G. (2015): “Big Data and predictive reasonable suspicion”, en: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol.163(2), pp. 327-410.
• FOWLES, J. (1974): “On Chronocentrism”, en: Futures, Vol. 6(1), pp. 65-68.
• FUKUYAMA, F. (1992/1992): “El fin de la Historia y el último hombre”¸ Planeta, Barcelona.
• GALLOWAY, K. (2017): “Big Data: A case study of disruption and government power” en: Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 42(2), pp. 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X17710612
• GARB, H.N. / WOOD, J.M. (2019): “Methodological advances in statistical prediction”, en: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 31(12), pp.1456-1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000673
• GARLAND, D. (2001): Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences, Sage, London
• GARLAND, D, (2003): “The Rise of Risk”, en: ERICSON, R. / DOYLE A, (eds.), Risk and Morality, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 48-86.
• GIDDENS, A, (1999): “Risk and Responsibility”, en: The Modern Law Review, Vol. 62(1), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00188.
• GODDARD, T. / MYERS, R.R. (2017): “Against evidence-based oppression: Marginalized youth and the politics of risk-based assessment and intervention”, en: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 21(2), pp. 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616645172
• HACKING, I. (1991): “How should we do the history of statistics?”, en: BURCHELL, G. / GORDON, C. / MILLER, P. (eds), The Foucault Effect Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 181–195.
• HÄLTERLEIN, J. (2021): “Epistemologies of predictive policing: Mathematical social science, social physics and machine learning”, en: Big Data & Society, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211003118
• HANNAH-MOFFAT, K. (2019): “Algorithmic risk governance: Big Data analytics, race and information activism in criminal justice debates” en: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 23(4), pp. 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618763582
• HANNAH-MOFFAT, K. / MAURUTTO, P. (2010): “Re-contextualizing pre-sentence reports. Risk and race”, en: Punishment and Society, Vol. 12(3), pp. 262-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474510369442
• HARCOURT, B.E. (2003): “From the ne’er-do-well to the criminal history category: The refinement of the actuarial model in criminal law”, en: Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 66(3), pp. 99-151.
• HAYWARD, K.J. / MAAS, M (2021): “Artificial intelligence and crime: A primer for criminologists”, en: Crime Media Culture, Vol. 17(2) 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659020917434
• HOFFMAN, P. (2003): History of the Federal Parole System, U.S. Dept. of Justice, United States Parole Commission, Washington, D.C.
• HOME OFFICE (2006): A Five Year Strategy for Protecting the Public and Reducing Reoffending. Command Number 6717, The Stationery Office, London.
• JURGENSON, N. (2014): View from nowhere. The New Inquiry. http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/view-from-nowhere/. (Último acceso: 10/2023).
• KARPPI, T. (2018): ““The Computer Said So”: On the Ethics, Effectiveness, and Cultural Techniques of Predictive Policing”, en: Social Media + Society, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768296
• KITCHIN, R. (2014): The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & their Consequences, Sage, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
• LOHR, S, (2015): Data-ism: The Revolution Transforming Decision Making, Consumer Behavior, and Almost Everything Else, HarperCollins. New York.
• LOINAZ, I. (2017): Manual de evaluación del riesgo de violencia. Metodología y ámbitos de aplicación, Pirámide, Madrid.
• LOWRIE, I. (2017): “Algorithmic rationality: Epistemology and efficiency in the data sciences”, en: Big Data & Society Vol. 4(1), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717700925
• LUPTON, D. (2013): Risk, Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070161
• LUPTON, D. (2016): The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking, Cambridge, Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12495
• MACKENZIE, A. (2005): “The Performativity of Code. Software and Cultures of Circulation”, en: Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 22(1), pp. 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405048436
• MACKENZIE, A. (2015): “The production of prediction: What does machine learning want?”, en European Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 18(4-5), pp. 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577384
• MANTELLO, P. (2016): "The machine that ate bad people: The ontopolitics of the precrime assemblage”, en: Big Data & Society, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716682538
• MAURUTTO, P. / HANNAH-MOFFAT, K. (2006): “Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control”, en: British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 46(3), pp. 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi073
• MARTÍNEZ GARAY, L.: (2014): “La incertidumbre de los pronósticos de peligrosidad: consecuencias para la dogmática de las medidas de seguridad”, en: Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, nº 2, pp. 1-78.
• MARTÍNEZ GARAY, L. / MONTES SUAY, F. (2018): “El uso de valoraciones del riesgo de violencia en Derecho Penal: algunas cautelas necesarias”, en: Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, nº 2, pp. 1-48.
• MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER V / CULKIER K. (2013): Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think, John Murray, London.
• MEHOZAY, Y. / FISHER, E. (2019): “The epistemology of algorithmic risk assessment and the path towards a non-penology penology”, en: Punishment and Society, Vol.21(5), pp. 523-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474518802336
• MINISTRY OF JUSTICE (2010): Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders, Ministry of Justice, London.
• MINOCHER, X. / RANDALL, C. (2020): “Predictable policing: New technology, old bias, and future resistance in Big Data surveillance”, en: Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Vol. 26(5-6), pp. 1108–1124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520933838
• MURPHY, K.P. (2012): Machine learning: A probabilistic perspective. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
• O´MALLEY, P. (1994): “Neo-liberal crime control. Political agendas and the future of crime prevention in Australia”, en: CHAPPELL, D. / WILSON, P. (eds.), The Australian Criminal Justice System. The Mid 1990s, Butterworths, Sydney, pp. 283-298.
• PASQUALE, F. (2015): The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• PETERSILIA, J. (1997): “Probation in the United States”, en Crime and Justice, nº 22, pp. 149-200.
• PETERSILIA, J. (1998): Community corrections: probation, parole, and intermediate sanctions, Oxford University Press, New York.
• POLACK, P. (2020): “Beyond algorithmic reformism: Forward engineering the designs of algorithmic systems”, en: Big Data & Society, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720913064
• PHELPS, M.S. (2017): “Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment”, en: Punishment & Society, Vol. 19(1), pp. 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516649174
• REICHMAN, N. (1986): “Managing Crime Risks: Towards an Insurance Based Model of Social Control”, en Research in Law and Social Control, nº 8, pp. 151-172.
• RESNYANSKY, L. (2019): “Conceptual frameworks for social and cultural Big Data analytics: Answering the epistemological challenge”, en: Big Data & Society, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718823815
• RIVERA BEIRAS, I. (2015): “Actuarialismo penitenciario. Su recepción en España”: en: Revista Crítica Penal y Poder 2015, nº 9, pp.102-144.
• RIGAKOS, G.S. / HADDEN, R.W. (2001): “Crime, Capitalism and the «Risk Society»”: Towards the same olde modernity?”, en: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 5(1), pp. 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480601005001004
• ROUVROY, A. / BERNS, T. (2013): “Algorithmic governmentality and prospects of emancipation. Disparateness as a precondition for individuation through relationships?”, en: Réseaux, Vol. 177(1), pp.163-.196. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163
• ROBINSON DG (2018): “The challenges of prediction: Lessons from criminal justice” en: I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, Vol. 14(2), pp. 151-186.
• SIMON, J. (1987): “The emergence of risk society: Insurance, Law and the State”, en Socialist Review, Vol. 95(1), pp. 61-89.
• SIMON, J. (1993): Poor discipline: parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890-1990, University of Chicago, Chicago.
• SIMON, J. (2013): “Punishment and the Political Technologies of the Body”, en SIMON, J. / SPARKS, R., (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Punishment and Society, Sage, London, pp. 60-89. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624
• SIMON, J. / FEELEY, M.M. (2003): “The Form and Limits of the New Penology”, en BLOMBERG, T.G. / COHEN, S., (eds.), Punishment and Social Control, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 76-116.
• SOLAR CAYÓN, J.I. (2020): “Inteligencia artificial en la justicia penal: los sistemas algorítmicos de evaluación de riesgos” en SOLAR CAYÓN, J.I. (ed.) Dimensiones éticas y jurídicas de la inteligencia artificial en el marco del Estado de Derecho, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, pp. 125-172
• STARR, S.B. (2014): “Evidence-based sentencing and the scientific rationalization of discrimination”, en Stanford Law Review, Vol. 66(4), pp. 803-872.
• STARR, S.B (2015): (2015), “The New Profiling. Why Punishing Based on Poverty and Identity Is Unconstitutional and Wrong”, en: Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 27(4), pp. 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2015.27.4.229
• STEVENSON, M.T. / SLOBOGIN, C. (2018): “Algorithmic Risk Assessments and the Double-Edged Sword of Youth” en: Washington University Law Review, Vol. 96(3), pp. 681-706.
• STRIKWERDA, L. (2021): “Predictive policing: The risks associated with risk assessment”, en: The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, Vol. 94(3) 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X20947749
• STRIPHAS, T. (2015): “Algorithmic culture”, en: European Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 18(4-5), pp. 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392
• TOLLENAAR, N. / VAN DER HEIJDEN, P.G.M. (2013): “Which method predicts recidivism best? A comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models”, en: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 176 (2), pp. 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01056.x
• UGWUDIKE, P. (2020): “Digital prediction technologies in the justice system: The implications of a ‘race-neutral’ agenda” en: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 24(3), pp. 482-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619896006
• VANSTONE, M. (2004): “Mission control: The origins of a humanitarian service”, en Probation Journal, Vol. 51(1), pp. 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550504041376
• VAN EIJK, G. (2017): “Socioeconomic marginality in sentencing: The built-in bias in risk assessment tools and the reproduction of social inequality”, en: Punishment & Society, Vol. 19(4), pp. 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516666282
• VELÁSQUEZ, J, (2014): “El origen del paradigma de riesgo”, en Política Criminal, Vol. 9(17), pp. 58-117.
• WHITE, S. (1976): “The nineteenth century origins of pre-sentence reports”, en Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Vol. 11(3), pp. 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/000486587801100306
• WEXLER, R. (2018): “Life, liberty, and trade secrets: Intellectual property in the criminal justice system” en: Stanford Law Review, Vol. 70, pp. 1343-1429. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2920883
• ZAVRSNIK, A. (2021): “Algorithmic justice: Algorithmics and Big Data in criminal justice settings”, en: European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 18(5), pp. 623-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819876762