Transhumanism, Society and Education: An Edusemiotic Approach

  1. Gómez Redondo, Susana 1
  2. Rodríguez Higuera, Claudio J.
  3. Coca, Juan R. 1
  4. Olteanu, Alin
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Studies in Philosophy and Education

ISSN: 0039-3746,  1573-191X

Ano de publicación: 2024

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1007/S11217-024-09927-6 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Studies in Philosophy and Education

Resumo

We propose a semiotic framework to underpin a posthumanist philosophy of education, as contrasted to technological determinism. A recent approach to educational processes as semiotic phenomena lends itself as a philosophy to understand the current interplay between education and technology. This view is aligned with the transhumanist movement to defend techno-scientific progress as fundamental to human development. Particularly, we adopt a semiotic approach to education to tackle certain tensions in current debates on the human. Transhumanism scholars share the optimistic belief that there is no limit to how the ethical use of technology can help alleviate suffering and increase our health and wisdom. From this perspective, it appears possible to acquire capacities that require rethinking the notion of human altogether. For others, this undermining of essentialist concepts of humanity entails serious risks, especially related to ethical egalitarianism. We adopte the perspective of edusemiotics, a framework that brings together semiotics, educational theory and philosophy of education. As a theoretical-practical framework, edusemiotics affords a hermeneutic and semiotic method for our approach. Peirce’s logic of signs is used to analyze socio- educational interactions as environmental. We observe two lines of thought. On the one hand, technological transhumanism enhances Cartesian mind–body dualism. On the other hand, philosophical posthumanism seeks to overcome this dichotomy. The former proposal construes human transformation as an artifactualization derived from techno-scientific enhancements. The latter position proposes an integrative posthumanism, capable not only to include edusemiotic theory but also to rethink the concept of learning as mutual to that of human.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adorno, Francesco Paolo. 2021. The transhumanist movement. Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bayne, Siân. 2018. Posthumanism: A navigation aid for educators. Education: Journal for Research and Debate. https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2018.2.1.
  • Becker, Joffrey. 2022. Anthropology, AI and robotics. In The Routledge Social Science Handbook of AI, ed. Anthony Eliott, 107–121. Routledge.
  • Bianchini, Samuel, et al. 2016. Towards behavioral objects: A twofold approach for a system of notation to design and implement behaviors in non-anthropomorphic robotic artifacts. In Dance notations and robot motion, ed. Jean Paul Laumond and Naoko Abe, 1–24. Springer.
  • Bostrom, Nick. 2005b. Transhumanist values. Journal of Phisolophical Research 30 (Supplement): 3–14.
  • Bostrom, Nick. 2005. A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology 14(1).
  • Boyd, Danah. 2014. It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58 (1): 7–19.
  • Cobley, Paul. 2016. Cultural implications of biosemiotics, vol. 15. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Colapietro, Vincent M. 1989. Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. State University of New York Press.
  • Deacon, Terence W. 2012. Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Deely, John N. 2009. Basics of semiotics, 5th ed. University of Tartu Press.
  • Dor, Daniel. 2015. The instruction of imagination: Language as a social communication technology. Oxford University Press.
  • Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
  • Endress, Martin. 2014. Interpretative sociologies and traditions of hermeneutics. In Schutzian phenomenology and hermeneutic traditions, ed. M. Staudigl and G. Berguno, 9–32. Springer.
  • Evans, John H. 2014. Faith in science in global perspective: Implications for transhumanism. Public Understanding of Science 23 (7): 814–832.
  • Feil, Sebastian, and Alin Olteanu. 2018. Abduction, hermeneutics and the interpretation of interpretations. Human Arenas 1: 206–222.
  • Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar Straus Giroux.
  • Fuller, Steve. 2016. Morphological freedom and the question of responsibility and representation in transhumanism. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics 4 (2): 33–45.
  • Fuller, Steve. 2022. The mind-technology problem. Postdigital Science and Education 4: 247–252.
  • Gadamer, Hans George. 2018. The enigma of health: The art of healing in a scientific age. Wiley.
  • Gal, Susan, and Judith T. Irvine. 2019. Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gare, Arran. 2021. Against posthumanism: Posthumanism as the world vision of house-slaves. Borderless Philosophy 4: 1–56.
  • Geeraerts, Dirk. 2016. The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 527–542.
  • Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuykens. 2007. Introducing cognitive linguistics. In The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, ed. Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuykens, 3–21. Oxford University Press.
  • Ginsburg, Simona, and Eva Jablonka. 2019. The evolution of the sensitive soul: Learning and the origins of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Gough, Steve, and Andrew Stables. 2012. Interpretation as adaptation: Education for survival in uncertain times. Curricululm Inquiry 42 (3): 368–385.
  • Hauskeller, Michael. 2012. Reinventing Cockaigne: Utopian themes in transhumanist thought. The Hastings Center Report 42 (2): 39–47.
  • Hayles, N. Katherine. 2006. Unfinished work: From cyborg to cognisphere. Theory, Culture and Society 23 (7–8): 159–166.
  • Hipólito, Inés., William Robert Clowes, and Klaus Gärtner, eds. 2021. The mind-technology problem: Investigating minds, selves and 21st Century artefacts. Springer.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2015. Semiotic scaffolding: A unitary principle gluing life and culture together. Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism 19 (3): 243–254.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper, and Kalevi Kull. 2003. Baldwin and biosemiotics: What intelligence is for. In Evolution and learning: The baldwin effect reconsidered, ed. Bruce H.. Weber and David J.. Depew, 253–272. MIT Press.
  • Hoffmeyer, Jesper, and Frederik Stjernfelt. 2016. The great chain of semiosis. Investigating the steps in the evolution of semiotic competence. Biosemiotics 9: 7–29.
  • Hottois, Gilbert. 1990. Le paradigm bioétihique. Une éthique pour la technoscience [The bioethical paradigm. An ethics for technoscience]. De Boeck-Erpi.
  • Hottois, Gilbert. 1999. Essais de philosophie bioéthique e biopolitique [Essays in bioethics and biopolitics]. Vrin.
  • Ilyin, Mikhail. 2020. Emergence and advancement of basic human capacities. Linguistic Frontiers 3 (2): 3–20.
  • Jablonka, Eva, and Simona Ginsburg. 2022. Learning and the evolution of conscious agents. Biosemiotics 15: 401–437.
  • Jandrić, Petar, Thomas Ryberg, Jeremy Knox, Nataša Lacković, Juha Suoranta, et al. 2019. Postdigital dialogue. Postdigit Science and Education 1: 163–189.
  • Klichowski, Michal. 2015. Transhumanism and the idea of education in the world of ciborgs. In The educational and social world of child. Discourses of comunication, sujectivity and cyborgization, ed. Hanna Krauze-Sikorska and Michal Klichowski, 431–438. Uniwersytet Im. Adama Mickiewizca W Poznaniu.
  • Kuby, Candance R., and Jennifer Rowsell. 2017. Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologie. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 17: 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417715720.
  • Kukkola, Jani, and Eetu Pikkarainen. 2017. Edusemiotecis, existential semiotics, and existential pedagogy. In Edusemiotics. A handbook, ed. I. Semetesky, 121–136. Springer.
  • Kull, Kalevi. 2010. Umwelt and modelling. In The Routledge Companion to Semiotics, ed. P. Cobley, 43–56. Routledge.
  • Kull, Kalevi. 2018. Choosing and learning: Semiosis means choice. Sign Systems Studies 46 (4): 452–466.
  • Lotman, Juri. 2001. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. I. B. Tauris.
  • Lotman, Juri. 2011. The place of art among other modelling systems. Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4): 249–270.
  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford University Press.
  • Macfarlane, James Michael. 2020. Transhumanism as a New Social Movement. The Techno-Centred Imagination. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • MacKenzie, Ian. 1990. Author, text, reader and community. Journal of Literary Semantics 19 (2): 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1990.19.2.116.
  • Meloni, Maurizio. 2014. How biology became social and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review 62 (3): 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12151.
  • Meloni, Maurizio. 2016. From boundary-work to boundary object: How biology left and re-entered the social sciences. The Sociological Review Monographs 64 (1): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/2059-7932.12013.
  • More, Max. 2013. The philosophy of transhumanism. In The Transhumanist Reader, ed. Max More and N. Vita-More, 3–17. Wiley.
  • Olteanu, Alin. 2017. Reading history: Education, semiotics, and edusemiotics. In Edusemiotics. A handbook, ed. I. Semetsky, 193–205. Springer.
  • Olteanu, Alin. 2021. Multimodal modeling: Bridging biosemiotics and social semiotics. Biosemiotics 14: 783–805.
  • Olteanu, Alin, and Andrew Stables. 2018. Learning and adaptation from a semiotic perspective. Sign Systems Studies 46 (4): 409–434.
  • Paolucci, Claudio. 2021. Cognitive semiotics: Integrating signs, minds, meaning and cognition. Springer.
  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1902. The basis of pragmatism. Harvard University Press.
  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols, Eds., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks. Harvard University Press.
  • Persson, Ingmar, and J. Savulescu. 2010. Moral transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6): 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq052.
  • Petrilli, Susan. 2013. The self as a sign, the wold, and the other. Routledge.
  • Petrilli, Susan, and Augusto Ponzio. 2005. Semiotics unbounded: Interpretive routes through the open network of signs. University of Toronto Press.
  • Pikkarainen, Eetu. 2021. Education, consciousness and negative feedback: Towards the renewal of modern philosophy of education. Philosophies 6: 1–25.
  • Porter, Allen. 2017. Bioethics and transhumanism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 42 (3): 237–260.
  • Rattasepp, Silver. 2018. The human mirror: A critique of the philosophical discourse on animals from the position of multispecies semiotics. University of Tartu Press.
  • de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959 [1916]. Course in general linguistics, Eds., Bally, C., Sechehaye, A. (Trans. Bakin, W.) Philosophical library.
  • Schutz, Alfred, and Thomas Luckmann. 1973. The structures of the life-world, vol. 1. Northwestern University Press.
  • Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 1965. Animal communication: A communication network model for languages is applied to signaling behavior in animals. Science 147 (3661): 1006–1014.
  • Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 2001. Signs: An introduction to semiotics. University of Toronto Press.
  • Sebeok, Thomas Albert, and Marcel Danesi. 2000. The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis, vol. 1. Walter de Gruyter.
  • Seebohm, Thomas M. 2004. Hermeneutics. Method and methodology. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Semenenko, Aleksei. 2016. Homo polyglottus: Semiosphere as a model of human cognition. Σημειωτκή-Sign Systems Studies 44 (4): 494–510.
  • Semetsky, Inna. 2015. Edusemiotics: The tao of education. Language and Semiotic Studies 1 (1): 130–143.
  • Semetsky, Inna. 2017a. Introduction: A primer on edusemiotics. In Edusemiotics. A hand book, ed. I. Smetesky, 1–14. Springer.
  • Semetsky, Inna. 2017b. The embodied mind: Education and transformation of habits. In Edusemiotics. A hand book, ed. I. Smetesky, 137–150. Springer.
  • Short, Thomas Lloyd. 2007. Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz. 2009. Nietzsche, the overhuman, and transhumanism. Journal of Evolution and Technology 20 (1): 29–42.
  • Srubar, Ilja. 2014. Pragmatic theory of the life-world and hermeneutics of the social scienes. In Schutzian phenomenology and hermeneutic traditions, ed. M. Staudigl and G. Berguno, 83–92. Springer.
  • Stables, Andrew. 2006. Sign(al)s: Living and learning as semiotic engagement. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (4): 373–387.
  • Stables, Andrew. 2012. Be(com)ing human: Semiosis and the myth of reason. Sense Publishers.
  • Stables, Andrew. 2016. The end(s) of learning and the role of instruction: Shaping the debate. In Communication and learning, ed. L.P. Witt, 43–65. De Gruyter.
  • Stables, Andrew, and Alin Olteanu. 2023. Semiotics in learning and education. In Bloomsbury semiotics volume 3: Semiotics in the arts and social sciences, ed. Jamin Pelkey, Susan Petrilli, and Sophia Melanson Ricciardone, 129–148. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Stables, Andrew, and Inna Semetsky. 2017. Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as educational foundation. Routledge.
  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Docent Press. Transhumanism Declaration. 2009. https://iamtranshuman.org/2020/03/09/transhumanist-declaration/. Date of consultation: 11 December 2021.
  • Uexküll, Jacob Von. 2010. A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With A theory of meaning (O’Neil, J. D. Trans.; 1st ed.). University Of Minnesota Press.
  • Vernadsky, Vladimir I. 2005 [1943]. Some words about the noösphere. 21st Century Science & Technology (Spring): 16–21.