Anàlisi crítica del discurs polític en anglès i castellà a través dels mitjans de comunicacióun estudi contrastiu de la manipulació i la persuasió en moments de crisi

  1. Mª Ángeles Orts Llopis
  2. Chelo Vargas Sierra
Revista:
Revista de llengua i dret

ISSN: 2013-1453

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 80

Páginas: 109-131

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.58992/RLD.I80.2023.3995 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de llengua i dret

Resumen

Aquest estudi ofereix una anàlisi detallada del llenguatge emprat en la cobertura de la pandèmia per The Guardian i El País, examinant la representació de les postures governamentals i la seva influència en la resposta dels ciutadans. S’investiga el paper d’aquests mitjans com a canals de comunicació governamental i el seu efecte en la percepció pública durant la crisi sanitària. A través d’una anàlisi rigorosa, confirmem la nostra hipòtesi que els governs del Regne Unit i Espanya van exercir una influència ambivalent sobre la població mitjançant l’ús estratègic d’un discurs manipulador. Aquest estudi es basa en la creació d’un corpus bilingüe i en l’ús d’anàlisi textual avançada per desentranyar les tàctiques de control i persuasió aplicades. Les troballes revelen una tendència cap a l’ús d’un lèxic carregat negativament i d’estratègies emocionals, així com l’ús de metàfores i argot tècnic per establir una asimetria informativa entre les autoritats i la ciutadania.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbas, Ali Haif. (2020). Politicizing the Pandemic: A Schemata Analysis of COVID-19 News in Two Selected Newspapers. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. Publicación anticipada en línea. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09745-2
  • Berber Sardinha, Tony. (2000). Comparing corpora with WordSmith Tools: How large must the reference corpus be? En Adam Kilgarriff y Tony Berber Sardinha (eds.), Proceedings of The Workshop on Comparing Corpora (pp. 7-13). Association for Computational Linguistics. Publicación en línea. https://aclanthology.org/W00-0900.pdf
  • Berger, Peter, y Luckmann, Thomas. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin.
  • Bhatia, Vijay, y Bhatia, Aditi. (2017). Interdiscursive Manipulation in Media Reporting: The Case of the Panama Papers in India. En María Angeles Orts, Maurizio Gotti y Ruth Breeze (eds.), Power, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres (pp. 29-50). Peter Lang.
  • Bleiker, Roland, y Hutchison, Emma. (2008). Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics. Review of International Studies, 34, 115-135.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14-25.
  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Chilton, Paul, y Schäffner, Christina. (1997). Discourse and politics. En Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 206-230). SAGE Publications.
  • Cialdini, Robert B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 2001(9), 72-81.
  • Coleman, Stephen, Konstantinova, Nely, y Moss, Giles. (2020). The Pandemic and its Publics: How people receive, interpret and act upon official guidance. University of Leeds.
  • Covello, Vincent T. (2003). Best Practices in Public Health Risk and Crisis Communication. Journal of Health Communication, 8(supl. 1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/713851971
  • Damasio, Antonio R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. G. P. Putnam.
  • Davison, W. P. (2020). Public Opinion. Encyclopedia Britannica. Publicación en línea.
  • Engberg, Jan. (2020). Institutional Dissemination of Legal Knowledge: An Instance of Knowledge Communication. En Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maci y Michele Sala (eds.), Scholarly Pathways: Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Exchange in Academia (pp. 175-205). Peter Lang.
  • Fairclough, Norman. (2014). Language and Power. Longman.
  • Fairclough, Norman, y Fairclough, Isabella. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Routledge.
  • Fairclough, Norman, y Wodak, Ruth. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. En Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 258-284). SAGE Publications.
  • Fossum, John Erik, y Schlesinger, Philip. (2007). The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? Routledge.
  • Garofalo, Giovanni. (2017). La insoportable levedad del acusar: el lenguaje de la valoración en las querellas de la Fiscalía Superior de Cataluña contra Carme Forcadell i Lluís. Franco Angeli.
  • Gramsci, Antonio. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart.
  • Halliday, Michael A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.
  • Heath, Robert L., y Bryant, Jennings. (2000). Human Communication Theory and Research: Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Heffner, Joseph, Vives, Marc-Lluís, y FeldmanHall, Oriel. (2021). Emotional responses to prosocial messages increase willingness to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110420
  • Kakisina, Peggy A., Indhiarti, Tantri R., y Al Fajri, Muchamad Sholakhuddin. (2022). Discursive Strategies of Manipulation in COVID-19 Political Discourse: The Case of Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079884
  • Kaplan, Nora. (2004). Nuevos desarrollos en el estudio de la evaluación en el lenguaje: La Teoría de la Valoración. Boletín de Lingüística, 16(22), 52-78.
  • Kilgarriff, Adam, y Renau, Irene. (2013). esTenTen, a Vast Web Corpus of Peninsular and American Spanish. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.617
  • Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel, y Tugwell, David. (2004). The Sketch Engine. En Geoffrey Williams y Sandra Vessier (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh EURALEX International Congress (pp. 105-116). Université de Bretagne-Sud.
  • Martin, James R., y White, Peter R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Martin, Jim R., y Rose, David. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. Continuum.
  • McEnery, Tony. (2016). Keywords. En Paul Baker y Jesse Egbert (eds.), Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research (pp. 20-32). Routledge.
  • Methven, Elyse. (2022). “There is no need for anyone to be concerned”: The discursive legitimation of coercive police powers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista de Llengua i Dret, Journal of Language and Law, 77, 54-70. https://doi.org/10.2436/rld.i77.2022.3773
  • Orts, María Á, y Vargas-Sierra, Chelo. (2022). Warning, or Manipulating in Pandemic Times? A Critical and Contrastive Analysis of Official Discourse Through the English and Spanish News. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35(3), 903-935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09869-z
  • Partington, Alan, y Taylor, Charlotte. (2018). The Language of Persuasion in Politics: An Introduction. Routledge.
  • Riorda, Mario, y Bentolila, Silvia. (2020). Cualquiera tiene un plan hasta que te pegan en la cara. Aprender de las crisis. Paidós.
  • Scott, Mike. (2016). In search of a bad reference corpus. En Dawn Archer (ed.), What’s in a Word-list? (pp. 79-91). Routledge.
  • Swales, John M. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schwarz-Friesel, Monika. (2015). Language and Emotion. The Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. En Ulrike M. Lüdtke (ed.), Emotion in Language (pp. 157-154). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.10.08sch
  • Seeger, Matthew W. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: an expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600769944
  • TenHouten, Warren. (2014). Emotion and Reason: Mind, Brain, and the Social Domains of Work and Love. Routledge.
  • Van Dijk, Teun A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Vargas-Sierra, Chelo, y Orts, María Á. (2023). Sentiment and emotion in financial journalism: A corpus-based, cross-linguistic analysis of the effects of COVID. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10, 219. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01725-8
  • Wagner, Anne, Matulewska, Aleksandra, y Marusek, Sarah. (2022). Pandemica Panoptica: Biopolitical Management of Viral Spread in the Age of Covid-19. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35, 1081-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09821-1
  • White, Peter R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23(2), 259-284.
  • Yuan, Hang, Long, Qinyi, Huang, Guanglv, Huang, Liqin, y Siyang, Luo. (2022). Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control. Social Science & Medicine, 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114677
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet