La Directiva Europea y las Órdenes de Producción y Conservación de pruebas electrónicas en los procesos penales. ¿Nuevas perspectivas?

  1. Carmen Cuadrado Salinas 1
  1. 1 Profesora Contratada Doctora (Profesora Titular Acreditada) de Derecho Procesal.Universidad de Alicante
Journal:
IUS ET SCIENTIA: Revista electrónica de Derecho y Ciencia

ISSN: 2444-8478

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 9

Issue: 2

Pages: 117-135

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12795/IESTSCIENTIA.2023.I02.06 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: IUS ET SCIENTIA: Revista electrónica de Derecho y Ciencia

Abstract

Procedural measures to obtain and preserve electronic evidence are increas-ingly important for the purposes of criminal investigation and prosecution across the European Union. If we tale into account that electronic data is of-ten stored outside the investigating State, it is easy to understand the huge problem that gathering of these data, as evidence can generate. This study analyzes the recently approved legal instruments, designed to solve these problems: the Directive and the Regulation on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders.

Bibliographic References

  • CASTRO SÁNCHEZ, A. (2020). Propuesta de implementación de Carrier-Grade NAT para Guifi.net. Uoc.edu.
  • CORHAY, M. (2021). Private Life, personal Data Protection and the Role of Service Providers: The EU E-Evidence Proposal. European Papers, 6.
  • DE HOYOS SANCHO, M. (2023). Novedades en materia de obtención transfronteriza de información electrónica necesaria para la investigación y enjuiciamiento penal en el ámbito europeo”. Revista de Estudios Europeos No Extraordinario monográfico, 1.
  • FRANSSEN, V. (2018). The European Commission’s E-evidence proposal: Toward an EU-wide obligation for service providers to cooperate with law enforcement? European Law Blog.
  • LARO GONZÁLEZ, E. (2022). Prueba penal transfronteriza: de la orden europea de investigación a las órdenes europeas de entrega y conservación de pruebas electrónicas”. Revista de Estudios Europeos, 79.
  • MARTÍNEZ SANTOS, A. (2023). Admisibilidad mutua de prueba penal transfronteriza en la Unión Europea: La propuesta de Directiva del European Law Institute”, en Revista General del Derecho Procesal.
  • PEERS, S. (2023). “The proposed European Investigation Order: Assault on human rights and national sovereignty”, online.
  • ROGALSKY, M. (2020). The European commission’s e-evidence proposal –critical remarks and proposal for changes. European Jouranl of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 28(4), 333-353, https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10018
  • SAYERS, D. (2011). “The European Investigation Order. Traveling without a ‘roadmap”.
  • SERGIO CARRERA, M. S. y. V. M. (2020). Cross-Border Data Acces in Criminal Proceedings and the Future of Digital Justice. Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/TFR-Cross-Border-Data-Access.pdf
  • TOSZA, S. (2020). “All evidence is equal, but electronic evidence is more equal than any other: the relationship between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order”. New Journal of European Criminal la
Data source: Dialnet