Relación entre el enfoque inductivo o deductivo del aprendizaje basado en casos en el rendimiento académico, la autoeficacia y la satisfacción de los estudiantes de trabajo social

  1. Fátima Méndez-López 1
  2. Loreto Camarero-Grados 1
  3. Anna Moleras-Serra 2
  4. Rachel Heah 3
  5. Ana Porroche-Escudero 3
  6. Rafael Sánchez-Arizcuren 4
  1. 1 1Health research institute of Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
  2. 2 Foundation University Institute for Primary Health Care Research Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol) Barcelona, Spain.
  3. 3 Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
  4. 4 ASPACE Foundation, Zaragoza, Spain.
Zeitschrift:
Acciones e investigaciones sociales

ISSN: 1132-192X

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Nummer: 44

Seiten: 90-103

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.26754/OJS_AIS/ACCIONESINVESTIGSOC.2023448992 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Acciones e investigaciones sociales

Zusammenfassung

Introduction: Case-Based Learning (CBL) teaching methodology is an active learning methodology that generates a higher level of student participation and significant learning. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare a CBL activity using deductive reasoning (analyse and extract theoretical concepts in a case provided for this purpose) and a CBL activity using inductive reasoning (create a case by implicitly introducing theoretical concepts) in terms of academic performance and student satisfaction, as well as to analyse the relationship of the latter with the perception of self-efficacy. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was developed. 111 students performed both CBL activities (deductive and inductive). Each learning activity dealt with theoretical contents of group psychology. The variables collected were: activity grade, satisfaction with each activity, theoretical exam grade and perception of self-efficacy. A descriptive, correlational, and comparative analysis was conducted using T-Student of related samples. Results: The gradesfor the inductive CBL activity were significantly higher than those for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.042). The students ́ level of satisfaction in the item “helps to think critically” was evaluated more favourably for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.029). The relationship between the grade of the inductive CBL activity and that obtained in the theoretical exam was significant. There was no correlation between any of the activities and the perceived self-efficacy of the students. Conclusions: The CBL activity with inductive reasoning is more effective to achieve academic performance and the satisfaction with the activities evaluated by the students is high.

Informationen zur Finanzierung

Geldgeber

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Baessler, J., y Schwarzer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: adaptación española de la Escala de Autoeficacia general [Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Spanish adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 2(1), 1–8.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (First, p. 71). Academic Press.
  • Banning, K. C. (2003). The Effect of the Case Method on Tolerance for Ambiguity. Journal of Management Education, 27(5), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252652
  • Bergmann, Jonathan., y Sams, Aaron. (2012). Flip your classroom : reach every student in every class every day (International Society for Technology in Education, Ed.).
  • Berrocal, F., y Pereda Marín, S. (2001). Formación y gestión del conocimiento. Revista Complutense de Educación, 12(2), 639–656.
  • Bi, M., Zhao, Z., Yang, J., y Wang, Y. (2019). Comparison of case-based learning and traditional method in teaching postgraduate students of medical oncology. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1124–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1617414
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance (First). Wiley.
  • Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., y Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
  • Escartín, J., Saldaña, O., Martín-Peña, J., Varela-Rey, A., Jiménez, Y., Vidal, T., y Rodríguez-Carballeira, Á. (2015). The Impact of Writing Case Studies: Benefits for Students’ Success and Well-being. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.009
  • Fernández García, T., y Ponce de León Romero, L. (2011). El proceso de intervención en el trabajo social con casos: una enseñanza teórica-práctica para las escuelas de trabajo social. Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales, 1 Ext, 371.
  • Gómez-Poyato, M. J., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Martínez-Pecharromán, M. M., Magallón-Botaya, R., y Oliván-Blázquez, B. (2020). Flipped classroom and role-playing as active learning methods in the social work degree: randomized experimental study. Social Work Education, 39(7), 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1693532
  • Graeff, T. R. (2010). Strategic Teaching for Active Learning. Marketing Education Review, 20(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008200307
  • IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. https://www.ibm.com/Jahnke, I., y Liebscher, J. (2020). Three types of integrated course designs for using mobile technologies to support creativity in higher education. Computers & Education, 146, 103782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103782
  • Keshmiri, F., Jafari, M., Dehghan, M., Raee-Ezzabadi, A., y Ghelmani, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of interprofessional education on interprofessional collaborative practice and self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1763827
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L., y Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. In Journal of the American Society of Training Directors (Third). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Kober, N. (2015). Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering (National Research Council, Ed.; First). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18687
  • Kolmos, A. (2004). Strategies to develop curricula based on problem formulation and organized in projects. Educar, 33, 77. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.262
  • Leonard, E. C., y Cook, R. A. (2010). Teaching with Cases. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 10(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220903559296
  • Lubin Pigouche, P., Maciá Antón, M. A., y Rubio de Lemus, P. (2005). Psicología matemática (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Ed.; Third). Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
  • Maqableh, M., Jaradat, M., y Azzam, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of students’ academic performance at university level: The mediating role of internet usage continuance intention. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4003–4025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10453-y
  • McLean, S. F. (2016). Case-Based Learning and its Application in Medical and Health-Care Fields: A Review of Worldwide Literature. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 3, JMECD.S20377. https://doi.org/10.4137/JMECD.S20377
  • NCSS Statistical Software. (2016). PASS Power Analysis Software and Sample Size Software . https://www.ncss.com/software/pass/
  • Newson, T. A., y Delatte, N. J. (2011). Case Methods in Civil Engineering Teaching. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 38(9), 1016–1030.
  • Oliván Blázquez, B., Masluk, B., Gascon, S., Fueyo Díaz, R., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Artola Magallón, I., y Magallón Botaya, R. (2019). The use of flipped classroom as an active learning approach improves academic performance in social work: A randomized trial in a university. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0214623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214623
  • Oliván-Blázquez, B., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Gascón-Santos, S., Gómez-Poyato, M. J., Valero-Errazu, D., Magallón-Botaya, R., Heah, R., y Porroche-Escudero, A. (2022a). Comparing the use of flipped classroom in combination with problem-based learning or with case-based learning for improving academic performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 146978742210815. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221081550
  • Olivan-Blázquez, B., Asensio-Martínez, Á., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Samper-Pardo, M., León-Herrera, S., y Méndez-López de-la-Manzanara, F. (2022b). From the analysis of a case study to the creation of storytelling as an active learning methodology and its comparison in relation to academic performance and satisfaction. 2936–2940. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.0743
  • Peng, W.-S., Wang, L., Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y.-M., Sang, X., Zhou, R., Xu, J.-L., y Chen, X. (2021). Application of virtual scenario simulation combined with problem-based learning for paediatric medical students. Journal of International Medical Research, 49(2), 030006052097921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520979210
  • Piqué Simón, B., y Forés Miravalles, A. (2012). Propuestas metodológicas para la educación superior. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/30702
  • Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002
  • Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Sánchez-Iglesias, I., Grande-de-Prado, M., Oliván-Blázquez, B., Martín-Peña, J., y Cancer-Lizaga, P. (2017). Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS). Anales de Psicología, 34(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.1.264931
  • Sanjuán Suárez, P., Pérez García, A. M., y Bermúdez Moreno, J. (2000). Escala de autoeficacia general: datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española. Psicothema, 12(Supl 2), 509–513.
  • Sellberg, C., y Wiig, A. C. (2020). Telling Stories from the Sea: Facilitating Professional Learning in Maritime Post-Simulation Debriefings. Vocations and Learning, 13(3), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-020-09250-4
  • The Foundation for Young Australians. (2017). THE NEW WORK MINDSET: 7 new job clusters to help young people navigate the new work order. https://www.fya.org.au/app/uploads/2021/09/The-New-Work-Mindset_2016.pdf
  • Zhu, X., Xiong, Z., Zheng, T., Li, L., Zhang, L., y Yang, F. (2021). Case‐based learning combined with science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education concept to improve clinical thinking of undergraduate nursing students: A randomized experiment. Nursing Open, 8(1), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.642