El futuro Reglamento de Inteligencia Artificial y las relaciones con terceros Estados

  1. Aurelio López-Tarruella Martínez
Revue:
Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

ISSN: 1697-5197

Année de publication: 2023

Número: 45

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)

Résumé

The Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act is one of the most representative features of the new regulatory model displayed by the European Union to regulate activities in the digital environment. The purpose of this work is to analyze the implications of the future Regulation from a Private international law perspective. A relevant provision in this regard is art. 2 (1) that establishes the territorial scope of application of the Regulation. The provision plays though a different role depending on the perspective we adopt to analyze it: that of the economic actors, that of the national competent authorities or that of the judicial courts. The provision has been criticized because it provides for an extraterritorial application of the Regulation. The work analyzes the justifications of such broad application and the connecting factors that determine the territorial application of the Regulation. An analysis is also included of the problems that may exist to ensure the effective enforcement of the decisions adopted by national surveillance authorities in cases where the provider or user of the AI systems are established in a third state. Finally, the work examines if, similar to what has happened with the GDPR, the future AI Act will produce the Brussels effect – i.e. if it will imply a de facto and de iure harmonization of the regulatory standards of AI in third states.

Références bibliographiques

  • BOMHARD, D., MERKLE, M., “Regulation of Artificial Intelligence”, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, vol. 10, Issue 6, 2021, pp. 257-261.
  • BRADFORD, A., The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World, OUP, 2020.
  • BUREAU D / MUIR WATT, H., Droit international privé, 3eme Ed., Puf, Paris, 2021, p. 107.
  • CALVO CARAVACA, A-L / CARRASCOSA GONZALEZ, J., Tratado de Derecho internacional privado, 2ª Ed, Valencia, Tirant lo blanch, 2022, pp. 520 ss.
  • CAPPIELLO, B., AI Systems and Non-contractual Liability: A European Private International LawAnalysis, Giappichelli 2022.
  • CARRASCOSA GONZALEZ, J., Derecho internacional privado y dogmática jurídica, Granada, Comares, 2021, pp. 81 ss.
  • DE GREGORIO, G. “The rise of digital constitutionalism in the European Union”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 41–70.
  • DE MIGUEL ASENSIO, P., Derecho privado de Internet, 6ª Ed, Civitas, Madrid, 2022, p. 411.
  • DE MIGUEL ASENSIO, P.A., “Libro Blanco sobre inteligencia artificial: evolución del marco normativo y aplicación efectiva”, La Ley Unión Europea, núm. 79, marzo 2020.
  • DE MIGUEL ASENSIO, P.A., “Propuesta de Reglamento sobre inteligencia artificial”. La Ley Unión Europea, núm. 92, mayo 2021.
  • EBERS, M. et al., “The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS)”, J, vol. 4, 2021, pp. 589-603.
  • FERNANDEZ ROZAS, J. C. / SANCHEZ LORENZO, S., Derecho internacional privado, 12 Ed, Thomson-Reuters, 2022, pars. 84 ss.
  • FRANC, S. “The Scope of Secondary Community Law in the Light of the Methods of Private International Law – or the Other Way Round?”, YPIL, vol. 8, 2006, pp. 333-374.
  • GASCÓN MACÉN, A., “El Reglamento General de Protección de Datos como modelo de las recientes propuestas de legislación digital europea”, CDT, Vol 13(2), 2021, pp. 209-232.
  • GREENLEAF, G., “The ‘Brussels Effect’ of the EU’s ‘AI Act’ on Data Privacy Outside Europe”, Privacy Laws & Business International Report, num. 171, 2021, pp. 3-7.
  • GSTREIN, O. J. & ZWITTER, A. J., “Extraterritorial application of the GDPR: promoting European values or power?”. Internet Policy Review, 10(3), 2021.
  • international law: an exotic cocktail pepped up with innovative research questions”, Lvcentinvs, 5 Julio 2021.
  • KRAMER, X. E., “The Interaction between Roma I and Mandatory EU Private Rules – EPIL and EPL: Communicating Vessels?”, P. Stone / Y. Farah (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Private International Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
  • KUNER, C, “Protecting EU data outside EU borders under the GDPR”, Common Market Law Review, vol 60- 1, 2023, pp. 77-106.
  • LAFUENTE SANCHEZ, R., “Compatibilidad del futuro régimen de responsabilidad civil en materia de IA con las normas de Derecho internacional privado en los accidentes de tráfico transfronterizo causados por vehículos automatizados”, AEDIPr, vol XXII, 2023, pp. 139-180.
  • LOPEZ-TARRUELLA MARTINEZ, A., “El ámbito territorial de protección de los derechos de la personalidad en el entorno de Internet (a propósito de las sentencias del TJUE de 24 de septiembre de 2019, C-507/17, Google, y de 3 de octubre de 2019, C18/18, Glawischnig-Piesczek)”, en la Crónica de Derecho internacional privado de REEI, vol 38, 2019, pp. 27-37.
  • LOPEZ-TARRUELLA, A., “El criterio de las actividades dirigidas como concepto autónomo de DIPr de la Unión Europea para la regulación de las actividades en internet”, REDI, vol. 69 (2), 2017, pp. 223-256.
  • LÚCIA RAPOSO, V. “Ex machina: preliminary critical assessment of the European Draft Act on artificial intelligence”, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 30, Issue 1, 2022, p. 102.
  • LUTZI, T., “The Scope of the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act: Thoughts on the Conflict of Laws”, Dalloz IP/IT, 22 Febrero 2023.
  • MONTI, G., “The Global Reach of EU Competition Law”, in Cremona, Marise, and Joanne Scott (eds), EU Law Beyond EU Borders: The Extraterritorial Reach of EU Law (Oxford, 2019; online edn, Oxford Academic, 20 June 2019), pp. 174- 196.
  • PAPAKONSTANTINOU, V. / DE HERT, P. “Post GDPR EU laws and their GDPR mimesis. DGA, DSA, DMA and the EU regulation of AI”, European Law Blog, 1 abril 2021.
  • PATO, A., “Artificial intelligence and private
  • POESEN, M, “Regulating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the European Union (EU): Exploring the Role of Private International Law” in X, Recht in beweging – 29ste VRG-Alumnidag 2022, Gompel&Svacina, 2022, pp. 297-314.
  • SVANTESSON, D. J. B. (“Article 3. Territorial scope”, en C. Kuner, L. A. Bygrave, & C. Docksey (Eds.), The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A commentary, Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 74–99.
  • SVANTESSON, D. J. B., “Internet & Jurisdiction Global Status Report 2019”, Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network, 2019, p. 147.
  • SVANTESSON, D., “The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act: Potential implications for Australia”, Alternative Law Journal, 47(1), 2022, pp. 4–9.
  • VEALE, M. y ZUIDERVEEN BORGESIUS, F.J., “Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach”, Computer Law Review International, vol. 22, 2021, pp. 97 – 112.
  • VIDA FERNÁNDEZ, J., “La gobernanza de los riesgos digitales: desafíos y avances en la regulación de la inteligencia artificial”, CDT, vol. 14(1), 2022, pp. 489-503.
  • WILDESPIN, M. / LEWIS, X., “Les relations entre le droit Communautaire et les régles de conflits de lois des États-membres”, RCDIP, 2002, p. 1 ss.
  • ZARRA, G., Imperativeness in Private International Law, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2021, pp. 109 ss.
La source de données: Dialnet