¿La evaluación evoluciona?Una experiencia de coevaluación en ABP

  1. José Vicente Berná Martínez 1
  2. Carlos José Villagrá Arnedo 1
  3. Rafael Molina Carmona 1
  4. Faraón Llorens Largo 1
  5. Francisco José Gallego Durán 1
  6. Sergio Javier Viudes Carbonell 1
  7. Pedro José Ponce de León Amador 1
  8. Mireia Luisa Sempere Tortosa 1
  9. María Dolores Sáez Fernández 1
  10. María Pilar Escobar Esteban 1
  11. Juan Antonio Gil Martínez-Abarca 1
  12. David Gil Méndez 1
  13. Antonio Ríos Vila 1
  14. Javier Ortiz Zamora 1
  15. Miguel Ángel Lozano Ortega 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Revista:
Actas de las Jornadas sobre la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (JENUI)

ISSN: 2531-0607

Ano de publicación: 2022

Número: 7

Páxinas: 263-270

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Actas de las Jornadas sobre la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (JENUI)

Resumo

For the last 8 years, the Multimedia Engineering degree has been teaching the 4th year using Project Based Learning (PBL) and integrating all the subjects in it. The program has been very successful, but there has always been one problem: assessment. As it is a highly collaborative group work, integrating all the subjects of the course and working on a single large project during the two semesters, it is very difficult to discern the real work done by each member, causing imbalances or even malpractice. For years, we have tried to adopt measures to mitigate this situation, but without any positive results. To solve this problem, we have designed and implemented a co-evaluation methodology, aligned with the PBL program management, which has two objectives: to ensure a distribution of points associated with the individual effort, based on objective and measurable information, together with a fair formative and summative evaluation; and to develop the soft skills that are essential in current collaborative work environments. In this article we present the co-evaluation tool developed, the assessment made of the tool by the participants in the experience and alumni from previous years, and the results obtained to date.