Algunas aplicaciones de los problemas de bancarrota a problemas de ingeniería y de gestión

  1. Mª Teresa Estañ Pereña 1
  1. 1 Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
    info

    Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

    Elche, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01azzms13

Revista:
Revista Doctorado UMH

ISSN: 2530-7320

Ano de publicación: 2018

Volume: 4

Número: 1

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.21134/DOCTUMH.V4I1.1487 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista Doctorado UMH

Resumo

En la literatura de la teoría de juegos podemos encontrar numerosos problemas, tanto de ámbito real como teórico, que son analizados como problemas de bancarrota. En este artículo vamos a realizar una breve revisión de algunos de estos problemas clasificándolos en dos vertientes: ingeniería y gestión empresarial

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aumann R, Maschler M. 1985. Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy from the Talmud. J. Econ. Theory 36:195-213.
  • Gozalvez J, Lucas-Estañ MC, Sánchez-Soriano J. 2007. User QoS based multi-channel assignment schemes under multimedia traffic conditions. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international symposium on wireless communications systems: 113-117.
  • Gozalvez J, Lucas-Estañ MC, Sánchez-Soriano J. 2008. Joint radio resource management in beyond 3G heterogeneous wireless systems. Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on wireless personal multimedia communications; Lapland, Finland.
  • Gutiérrez E, Llorca N, Mosquera M, Sánchez-Soriano J. 2018. Sustainable allocation of greenhouse gas emission permits for firms with Leontief technologies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.011.
  • Lucas-Estañ M C, Gozalvez J, Sánchez-Soriano J, Pulido M, Calabuig D. 2007. Multi-channel radio resources distribution polices in heterogeneous traffic scenarios. Proceedings of the 66th IEEE vehicular technology conference: 1674-1678.
  • O’Neill B. 1982. A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math. Soc. Sci. 2:345–371.
  • Pulido M, Sánchez-Soriano J, Llorca N. 2002. Game theory techniques for university management an extended bankruptcy model. Ann. Oper. Res. 109:129-142.
  • Pulido M, Borm P, Hendrickx R, Llorca N, Sánchez-Soriano J. 2008. Compromise solutions for bankruptcy situations with references. Ann. Oper. Res 158:133-141.
  • Shapley L. 1953. A value for n-person games. In Kuhn, HW, Tucker AW, editors. Contributions to the Theory of games II (Annals of mathematics studies 28). Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 307-317.
  • Suzuki M, Nakayama M. 1976. The cost assignment of the cooperative water resource development: A game theoretical approach. Manage. Sci. 22:1081-1086.
  • Thomson W. 2003. Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Math. Soc. Sci. 45:249-297.
  • Thomson W. 2015. Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update. Math. Soc. Sci. 74:41-59.
  • Young HP, Okada N, Hashimoto T. 1982. Cost allocation in water resources development. Water Resour. Res. 18:463-475.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet