Conservatism of earnings reported under International Accounting Standardds: A comparative study

Referencias bibliográficas

• AHMED, A., BILLINGS, B., MORTON, R., and STANFORD-HARRIS, M. 2002. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs, The Accounting Review, 77, 867-890.
• AHMED, A., and DUELLMAN, S. 2007. Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in corporate governance, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43, 411-437.
• AHMED, A., and DUELLMAN, S. 2008. Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers' investment decisions, Working paper, Texas A&M University. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract-id=1012347
• BALL, R., and Kothari, S. P. 2007. Econometrics of the Basu Asymmetric Timeliness Coefficient and Accounting Conservatism, Working paper, University of Chicago and MIT. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/abstract=999710.
• BALL, R., KOTHARI, S. P., and Robin, A. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 1-51.
• BALL, R., ROBIN, A., and SADKA, G. 2008. Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism, Review of Accounting Studies, forthcoming, Available online since January 6, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/slll42-007-9064-x.
• BALL, R., ROBIN, A., and WU, J. S. 2003. Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting in four East Asian countries, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36, 235-270.
• BAO, B., and BAO, D. 2004. Income smoothing: earnings quality and firm valuation, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 31 (9-10), 1.525-1.557.
• BASU, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 3-37.
• BASU, S. 1999. Discussion on international differences in timeliness, conservatism and classification of earnings, Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (supplement), 89-99.
• BASU, S. 2001. Discussion on the asymmetric recognition of good and bad news in France, Germany and the United Kingdom, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, 1.285-1.331.
• BEAVER, W. H., and RYAN, S. G. 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity, Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 127-148.
• BEAVER, W. H., and RYAN, S. G. 2005. Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modelling, Review of Accounting Studies, 10, 269-309.
• BEEKES, W., POPE, P. F., and YOUNG, S. 2004. The link between earnings timeliness, earnings conservatism and board composition: evidence from the UK, Corporate Governance, 12 (1), 47-51.
• BUSHMAN, R. M., and PIOTROSKI, J. D. 2006. Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 107-148.
• BUSHMAN, R. M., PIOTROSKI, J. D., and SMITH, A. J. 2006. Capital allocation and timely accounting recognition of economic losses: International evidence, Working Paper, The University of Chicago.
• DIETRICH, J. R.; MULLER, K. A., and RIEDL, E. J. 2007. Asymmetric timeliness tests of accounting conservatism, Review of Accounting Studies, 12, 95-124.
• FAMA, E., and MACBETH, J. 1973. Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607-636.
• GARCÍA LARA, J. M.; GARCÍA OSMA, B., and MORA, A. 2005. The effect of earnings management on the asymmetric timeliness of earnings, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 32 (3 & 4), 691-726.
• GARCÍA LARA, J. M.; GARCÍA OSMA, B., and PENALVA, F. 2007. Board of directors' characteristics and conditional accounting conservatism: Spanish Evidence, European Accounting Review, 16, 727-755.
• GARCÍA LARA, J. M.; GARCÍA OSMA, B., and PENALVA, F. 2008a. Accounting conservatism and corporate governance, Review of Accounting Studies, forthcoming, Available online since November 30, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s11142-007-9060-1.
• GARCÍA LARA, J. M.; GARCÍA OSMA, B., and PENALVA, F. 2008b. Cost of equity and accounting conservatism. Working paper, American Accounting Association annual meeting 2007.
• GARCÍA LARA, J. M., and MORA, A. 2003. La incorporación asimétrica de noticias al resultado contable en un contexto europeo: Evidencia empírica, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 32, 235-264.
• GARCÍA LARA, J. M., and MORA. A. 2004. Balance sheet versus earnings conservatism in Europe, European Accounting Review, 13, 261-292.
• GASSEN, J.; FULBIER, R. U., and SELLHORN, T. 2006. International differences in conditional conservatism: the role of unconditional conservatism and income smoothing, European Accounting Review, 15, 527-564.
• GINER, B., and REES, W. 2001. On the asymmetric recognition of good and bad news in France, Germany and the United Kingdom, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, 1.285-1.331.
• GIVOLY, D., and HAYN, C. 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 287-320.
• INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD IASB. 2003. International Accounting Standard 16: Property, Plant and Equipment, Amended December 2005. IASCF, London.
• INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS COMMITTEE IASC. 1989. Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements, London: IASC.
• LAFOND, R., and WATTS, R. 2008. The information role of conservatism, The Accounting Review, 83, 443-478.
• NOBES, C. W. 1983. A judgmental international classification of financial reporting practices, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 10 (1), 1-19.
• POPE, P. F., and WALKER, M. 1999. International differences in the timeliness, conservatism and classification of earnings, Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (supplement), 53-87.
• POPE, P. F., and WALKER, M. 2003. Ex-ante and ex-post accounting conservatism, asset recognition and asymmetric earnings timeliness, Working paper, Lancaster University and The University of Manchester.
• RAONIC, I., MCLEAY, S. J., and ASIMAKOPOULOS, I. 2004. The timeliness of income recognition by European companies: an analysis of institutional and market complexity, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 31, 115-148.
• RYAN, S. G. 2006. Identifying conditional conservatism, European Accounting Review, 15, 511-525.
• VANDER BAUWHEDE, H. 2007. The Impact of Conservatism on the Cost of Debt: Conditional versus Unconditional Conservatism, Working paper, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
• WHITE, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48, 817-838.
• ZHANG, X. 2000. Conservative accounting and equity valuation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 125-149.