Lo construido¿siempre hay que hacer?. Acción con lo extraordinario vs. percepción de lo genérico

  1. López Ujaque, José Manuel
  2. Capdevila Castellanos, Iván
Revue:
Boletín Académico: Revista de investigación y arquitectura contemporánea

ISSN: 2173-6723

Année de publication: 2021

Número: 11

Pages: 32-51

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17979/BAC.2021.11.0.7182 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Boletín Académico: Revista de investigación y arquitectura contemporánea

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

Any project that works on pre-existing buildings involves an act of design that, like any other work, can be approached in very different ways. Generally, the history of architectural intervention has led us to understand it as a process of enhancement of the extraordinary and almost always leading to a major intellectual and material effort. Through several case studies, mainly associated with two exhibitions curated by OMA and the German pavilion at the Venice Biennale of Architecture (2010 and 2012), this article raises questions regarding an alternative way of dealing with the pre-existing: can such a process also be understood from a contemplative point of view? Is it also possible to recognize value in the generic and in the extraordinary?

Références bibliographiques

  • Borges, Jorge Luis. El jardín de senderos que se bifurcan. Buenos Aires: Sur, 1941.
  • Brook, Peter. The Shifting Point: Theatre, Film, Opera 1946-1987. Nueva York: Harper & Row, 1989.
  • Casqueiro Barreiro, Fernando, Silvia Colmenares, Nicolás Maruri, y Antonio Miranda Regojo-Borjes. “Arquitectura y transformación”. En Criterios de intervención en el patrimonio arquitectónico del siglo XX: Conferencia Internacional CAH20thC, Madrid, 14, 15 y 16 de junio de 2011 = Intervention Approaches in the 20th Century Architectural Heritage: International Conference CAH20thC, coordinado por María Domingo y Iolanda Muíña, 265-274. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura, 2011.
  • Han, Byung-Chul. La sociedad del cansancio. Barcelona: Herder, 2012.
  • Koolhaas, Rem. Preservation is overtaking us. New York: GSAPP, 2014.
  • Koolhaas, Rem. “Cronocaos”. Log, n.º 21 (2011): 119-123.
  • Kubler, George. La configuración del tiempo. Madrid: Nerea, 1988.
  • Lacaton, Anne y Jean-Philippe Vassal. Freedom of use. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2015.
  • Leeser, Jörg y Urs Füssler. “The Flower Shop in Oberbarmen: The Wuppertal Studio and Seminar”. Candide. Journal for Architectural Knowledge, n.º 04 (2011): 37-68.
  • López de la Cruz, Juan José. Proyectos encontrados: arquitecturas de la alteración y el desvelo. Sevilla: Recolectores Urbanos, 2012.
  • Márquez Cecilia, Fernando y Richard Levene, eds. “David Chipperfield 2006-2010”. El Croquis, no. 150 (2010).
  • Otero-Pailos, Jorge. “Suplement al Manifest d'OMA per la preservació = Suplemento al manifiesto de preservación de OMA”. Quaderns, n.º 263 (2011): 42-54.
  • Petzet, Muck y Florian Heilmeyer. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: Architecture as Resource. Berlín: Hatje Cantz, 2012.
  • Solà-Morales, Ignasi de. “Teorías de la intervención arquitectónica”. En Intervenciones, 13-22. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2006.