La efectividad de las pruebas penales obtenidas en el marco de la futura normativa europea relativa a la obtención y conservación de pruebas electrónicas.

  1. CARMEN CUADRADO SALINAS
Revista:
Revista General de Derecho Procesal

ISSN: 1696-9642

Ano de publicación: 2021

Número: 55

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Revista General de Derecho Procesal

Resumo

The internet served as a powerful lifeline in COVID-19 imposed lockdowns around the world, allowing for communication with loved ones, as well as for the acquisition of goods and services that would have otherwise been impossible to obtain. At the same time however, and rather worryingly, investigation and prosecution of crime is hindered by a lack in sharing of evidence stored by service providers in non-EU countries. The formulation of legal instruments at the European level, interestingly designed in a pre-COVID era, can serve to alleviate these difficulties in obtaining evidence of a crime of a cross-border nature. This article analyzes the advantages of such regulations, but also highlights the shortcomings that, if not considered by the European legislator, can ruin the purpose for which they are intended.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • CUADRADO SALINAS, C., Fundamento y efectos de la exclusión de la prueba obtenida con vulneración de Derechos Fundamentales. Análisis teórico y jurisprudencial de la regla de exclusión en los EEUU, Reino Unido, Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos y España. Ed. Tirant Lo Blanch, 2021
  • BRIÉRE, C. “EU Criminal Procedural Law onto the Global Stage: The e-Evidence Proposals and Their Interaction with International Developments”, European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) vol. 6, 2021,
  • FUENTES SORIANO, O., “Europa ante el reto de la prueba digital. El establecimiento de instrumentos probatorios comunes: las órdenes de entrega y conservación de pruebas electrónicas”. En Era Digital, Sociedad y Derecho (Olga Fuentes Soriano Dir.), ed. Tirant Lo Blanch, 2020.
  • FUENTES SORIANO, O., “The (Future) European Electronic Evidence Delivery Order”. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, vol. 22(8), 2020.
  • FUENTES SORIANO, O., “La (Futura) Orden Europea de entrega de pruebas electrónicas”, en La justicia penal del siglo XXI ante el desafío del blanqueo de dinero (Ágata Sanz Hermida, Dir.), Tirant Lo Blanch, 2021.
  • FRANSSEN, V. https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/10/12/the-european-commissions-e-evidence-proposal-toward-an-eu-wide-obligation-for-service-providers-to-cooperate-with-law-enforcement/
  • GONZALEZ AMIGO, L. “Las órdenes europeas de entrega y conservación de pruebas penales electrónicas: una regulación que se aproxima”, en Revista Española de Derecho Europeo, num. 17, julio-septiembre 2019.
  • INDA, F.J., “La investigación policial en el ámbito de la informática”, en Eguzkilore, Nº 20, diciembre 2006.
  • KERR, O.S., “Digital Evidence and the New Criminal Procedure”, Columbia Law Review, vol. 105, 2005.
  • KERR, O.S., “Search Warrants in an Era of Digital Evidence”, Mississippi Law Journal, vol. 75, 2005.
  • MASON.S Electronic Evidence, Disclosure, Discovery and Admissibility, ed. Butterworths, 2007.
  • MASON.S,/GEORGE, E., “Digital Evidence and ‘Cloud’ Computing”, en Computer Law and Security Review, Nº 27, 2011.
  • ORTIZ PRADILLO, J.C., “Fighting against Cybercrime in Europe: The Admissibility of Remote Searches in Spain”, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Nº 19, 2011.
  • SPENCER,J.,http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0004/civil_society/john_spencer_en.pdf
  • STEIN SCHJOLBERG/ HUBBARD, A.M., “Harmonizing National Legal Approaches on Cybercrime”, http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/cybersecurity/docs/Background_Paper_Harmonizing_National_and_Legal_Approaches_on_Cybercrime.pdf
  • TAPPER, C., “Electronic Evidence and the Criminal Justice Act 2003”, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2004.
  • WALDEN, I., “Accessing Data in the Cloud: The Long Arm of the Law Enforcement Agent”, en http://ssrn.com/abstract=1781067