Lactancia materna en mujeres que concibieron mediante tratamientos de fertilidaduna revisión sistemática

  1. C. Saus-Ortega
  2. L. Celda-Belinchón
  3. A. Oliver-Roig
Revue:
Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra

ISSN: 1137-6627

Année de publication: 2020

Volumen: 43

Número: 2

Pages: 235-244

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra

Résumé

Women subjected to fertility treatment present needs requiring medical attention and decision-making processes before and after delivery that might influence their behaviour in maternal breastfeeding. This review examined the effect of fertility treatments on the start, duration and exclusiveness of maternal lactation based on all the observational studies that compared some result of maternal lactation according to the form of conception. Two reviewers extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias. The effect of fertility treatments on the results of maternal lactation was small or not significant, and on occasions contradictory. The evidence is limited due to the low number of articles of sufficient quality included. For the time being, fertility treatments do not seem to influence the start, duration and exclusiveness of maternal lactation, but until more and better studies are available, individualized support is recommended for each mother-child dyad according to its characteristics.

Références bibliographiques

  • Citas 1. World Health Organization. Implementation guidance: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services: the revised baby-friendly hospital initiative. World Health Organization 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272943.
  • Department of Nutrition for Health and Development. World Health Organization. Global nutrition targets 2025: breastfeeding policy brief. World Health Organization 2014. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/149022/WHO_NMH_NHD_14.7_eng.pdf
  • BARRERA CM, KAWWASS JF, BOULET SL, NELSON JM, PERRINE CG. Fertility treatment use and breastfeeding outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220: 261.e1-261.e7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1100
  • EVANS A, MARINELLI KA, TAYLOR JS, The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. ABM clinical protocol# 2: Guidelines for hospital discharge of the breastfeeding term newborn and mother: “The going home protocol,” revised 2014. Breastfeed Med 2014; 9: 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2014.9996
  • VANDER BORGHT M, WYNS C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem 2018; 62: 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012
  • BOIVIN J, BUNTING L, COLLINS JA, NYGREN KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1506-1512. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046
  • World Health Organization. Sexual and reproductive health: infertility is a global public health issue. World Health Organization 2019. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/perspective/en/
  • BARBIERI RL. Female Infertility. In: Strauss JF, Barbieri RL, editores. Yen & Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology. Elsevier, 2019; 556-581.
  • SHA T, YAN Y, GAO X, LIU S, CHEN C, LI L et al. Association of assisted reproductive techniques with infant feeding practices: a community-based study in China. Breastfeed Med 2019; 14: 654-661. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0061
  • DUWE KN, REEFHUIS J, HONEIN MA, SCHIEVE LA, RASMUSSEN SA. Epidemiology of fertility treatment use among US women with liveborn infants, 1997–2004. J Womens Health 2010; 19: 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1499
  • BRASIL ESTEVES TM, PAVIA DAUMAS R, COUTO DE OLIVEIRA MI, DE FERREIRA ANDRADE CA, COSTA LEITE I. Factors associated to breastfeeding in the first hour of life: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica 2014; 48: 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005278
  • BARRINGTON KJ, JANVIER A. The paediatric consequences of assisted reproductive technologies, with special emphasis on multiple pregnancies. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102: 340-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12145
  • HANSEN M, BOWER C. The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on intra-uterine growth and birth defects in singletons. Semin Fetal Neonat M 2014; 19:228-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.03.002
  • O'QUINN C, METCALFE A, MCDONALD SW, RAGUZ N, TOUGH SC. Exclusive breastfeeding and assisted reproductive technologies: a Calgary cohort. Reproductive Sys Sexual Disord 2012; S5: 002. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-038x.s2-002
  • AWTANI M, MATHUR K, SHAH S, BANKER M. Infertility stress in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization treatments. J Hum Reprod Sci 2017; 10: 221-225. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_39_17
  • SANTANA GS, GIUGLIANI ERJ, VIEIRA TDO, VIEIRA GO. Factors associated with breastfeeding maintenance for 12 months or more: a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J) (Versão em Português) 2018; 94: 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedp.2017.09.023
  • MOHER D, LIBERATI A, TETZLAFF J, ALTMAN DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  • METHLEY AM, CAMPBELL S, CHEW-GRAHAM C, MCNALLY R, CHERAGHI-SOHI S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
  • World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Part 1: definitions: conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6-8 November 2007 in Washington DC, USA. World Health Organization, 2008. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43895/9789241596664_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  • BAI A, SHUKLA VK, BAK G, WELLS G. Quality assessment tools project report. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2012. https://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/QAT_final.pdf
  • National Institutes of Health. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
  • LOUIS GMB, DRUSCHEL C, BELL E, STERN JE, LUKE B, MCLAIN A et al. Use of assisted reproductive technology treatment as reported by mothers in comparison with registry data: the Upstate KIDS Study. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 1461-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.033
  • LADORES S, AROIAN K. First-time mothers with a history of infertility: their internalized pressure to breastfeed. J Hum Lact 2015; 31: 504-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334415585511
  • BARNES M, ROIKO A, REED R, WILLIAMS C, WILLCOCKS K. Experiences of birth and breastfeeding following assisted conception. Breastfeed Rev 2013; 21: 9-15.
  • CROMI A, SERATI M, CANDELORO I, UCCELLA S, SCANDROGLIO S, AGOSTI M et al. Assisted reproductive technology and breastfeeding outcomes: a case-control study. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.009
  • MICHELS KA, MUMFORD SL, SUNDARAM R, BELL EM, BELLO SC, YEUNG EH. Differences in infant feeding practices by mode of conception in a United States cohort. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 1014-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.043
  • MCDONALD SD, PULLENAYEGUM E, CHAPMAN B, VERA C, GIGLIA L, FUSCH C et al. Prevalence and predictors of exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318256194b
  • MCMAHON CA, UNGERER JA, TENNANT C, SAUNDERS D. Psychosocial adjustment and the quality of the mother-child relationship at four months postpartum after conception by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 492-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00230-6
  • PLACE I, ENGLERT Y. A prospective longitudinal study of the physical, psychomotor, and intellectual development of singleton children up to 5 years who were conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with children conceived spontaneously and by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1388-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.004
  • MAU KAI C, MAIN KM, NYBOE ANDERSEN A, LOFT A, CHELLAKOOTY M, SKAKKEBÆK NE et al. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and growth in children born after assisted reproduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 4352-4360. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0701
  • HAMMARBERG K, ROWE H, FISHER J. Early post-partum adjustment and admission to parenting services in Victoria, Australia after assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2801-2809. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep282
  • LEE S, LEE M, CHIANG T, LEE M, LEE M. Child growth from birth to 18 months old born after assisted reproductive technology - Results of a national birth cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47: 1159-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.006
  • HAMMARBERG K, FISHER J, WYNTER KH, ROWE HJ. Breastfeeding after assisted conception: a prospective cohort study. Acta Paediatr 2011; 100: 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02095.x
  • FISHER J, HAMMARBERG K, WYNTER K, MCBAIN J, GIBSON F, BOIVIN J et al. Assisted conception, maternal age and breastfeeding: an Australian cohort study. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102: 970-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12336
  • DA SILVA SG, DA SILVEIRA MF, BERTOLDI AD, DOMINGUES MR, DOS SANTOS IDS. Maternal and child-health outcomes in pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2755-z
La source de données: Dialnet