¿La noción de «país seguro» es segura?Un análisis a la luz de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos

  1. Soler García, Carolina 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Zeitschrift:
Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo

ISSN: 1138-4026

Datum der Publikation: 2020

Jahr: 24

Nummer: 66

Seiten: 559-600

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.18042/CEPC/RDCE.66.09 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

The Directive 2013/32/EU contemplates three concepts of safe country. First, the application of the concept of “safe country of origin” allows the Member State to process an application for international protection by a national of that country through an accelerated procedure. Second, the application of the concept of “safe third country” makes it possible for the Member State to reject an application for international protection. And third, the application of the concept of “European safe third” country allows the Member State not to carry out, or at least not to do so completely, the examination of the application for international protection. Some Member States have adopted national lists of safe countries of origin, and even the Commission has proposed that a common European list of safe countries of origin be adopted. In any case, both the legislative, administrative and judicial practice of the Member States, as well as the application of readmission agreements signed by the EU, must comply with Directive 2013/32/EU, the ECHR and the ECHR jurisprudence. The study of the ECHR jurisprudence that interprets and applies Arts. 2 and 3 of the ECHR, demonstrates the need for a complete and ex nunc examination of both the prevailing circumstances in a given State and the specific circumstances of the person subject to expulsion, before proceeding with the expulsion. Otherwise, the establishment of a timeless and depersonalized list of safe countries of origin can come into conflict with the ECtHR jurisprudence. In this regard, the jurisprudence of this Court provides criteria that allow the development of those set out in Directive 2013/32/EU, in order that the classification of a country as safe is based on the effective respect of human rights, one of the values on which the EU is founded.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Abrisketa Uriarte, J. (2017). La dimensión externa del Derecho de la Unión Europea en materia de refugio y asilo: un examen desde la perspectiva del non-refoulement. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 56, 119-158. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rdce.56.04.
  • Abrisketa Uriarte, J. (2019). El «tercer país seguro» en el sistema europeo de asilo: ¿nomen est omen? En N. Cornago, J. L. de Castro y L. Moure (eds.). Repensar la Unión Europea: Gobernanza, Seguridad, Mercado Interior y Ciudadanía (pp. 209-223). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • ACNUR (2006). Nota del ACNUR sobre las garantías diplomáticas y la protección internacional de los refugiados. Ginebra: Sección de Operaciones de Protección y Asesoría Legal. División de Servicios de Protección Internacional.
  • AIDA (2015a). Common Asylum System at a Turning Point: Refugees Caught in Europe’s Solidarity Crisis. Asylum Information Database. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3e9g4uc.
  • AIDA. (2015b). “Safe countries of origin”: A safe concept? Legal Briefing, 3. European Council on Refugees and Exiles. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2UL0aP6.
  • Arenas Hidalgo, N. (2010). Los acuerdos europeos de readmisión de inmigrantes en situación irregular. Diez años de política europea de readmisión a debate. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 43, 53-90.
  • Binkovitz, I. (2018). State Practice with Respect to the Safe Third Country Concept: Criteria for Determining that a State Offers Effective Protection for Asylum Seekers and Refugees. George Washington International Law Review, 50 (3), 581-612. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/30K0TUw.
  • Cortés Martín, J. M. (2018). Avatares del proceso de adhesión de la Unión Europea al Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Madrid: Reus.
  • EASO (2015). Asylum Applicants from the Western Balkans: comparative analysis of trends, push-pull factors and responses – Update. European Asylum Support Office.
  • EASO (2016). Annual Report on the situation of Asylum in the European Union 2016. European Asylum Support Office.
  • EASO (2017). Annual Report on the situation of Asylum in the European Union 2017. European Asylum Support Office.
  • Fernández Arribas, G. (2019). El difícil encaje de las devoluciones de refugiados a Turquía ¿y a Libia? con el principio de non refoulement desarrollado por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. En N. Cornago, J. L. de Castro y L. Moure (eds.). Repensar la Unión Europea: Gobernanza, Seguridad, Mercado Interior y Ciudadanía (pp. 198-207). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Gil Bazo, M. T. (2015). The Safe Third Country Concept in International Agreements on Refugee Protection. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 33 (1), 42-77. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411503300104.
  • Moreno-Lax, V. (2015). The Legality of the “Safe Third Country” Notion Contested: Insights from the Law of Treaties. En G. S. Goodwin-Gill y P. Weckel (eds.). Migration and Refugee Protection in the 21st Century: Legal Aspects (pp. 665-721). Brill; Nijhoff; Boston: The Hague Academy of International Law Centre for Research.
  • Morgades Gil, S. (2012). TEDH - Sentencia de 21.01.2011 (Gran Sala), M.S.S. c. Bélgica y Grecia, 30696/09 - «Artículos 3 y 13 CEDH - Prohibición de tortura y penas o tratos inhumanos o degradantes - Reglamento (CE) n.º 343/2003 de determinación del Estado responsable del examen de una solicitud de asilo (Dublín II)». El funcionamiento efectivo de la política europea de asilo ante la garantía del derecho a no sufrir tratos inhumanos o degradantes del CEDH. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 41, 183-204.
  • Morgades Gil, S (2020). The “Internal” Dimension of the Safe Country Concept: the Interpretation of the Safe Third Country Concept in the Dublin System by International and Internal Courts. European Journal of Migration and Law, 22 (1), 82-113. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340070.
  • Panella, L. (2018). La giurisprudenza della Corte Europea dei Diritti dell’Uomo e quella della Corte di Giustizia dell’Unione Europea en materia di immigrazione a confronto: un contrato insanabile? Revista Ordine Internazionale e Diritti Umani, 3. Disponible en: http://www.rivistaoidu.net/sites/default/ files/2_Panella.pdf.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet