Flipped Classroom Como Propuesta en la Mejora del Rendimiento Académico y Motivación del Alumnado en Educación Física

  1. Gómez-García, José 1
  2. Sellés, Sergio 1
  3. Ferriz-Valero, Alberto 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Revue:
Kronos: revista universitaria de la actividad física y el deporte

ISSN: 1579-5225

Année de publication: 2019

Volumen: 18

Número: 2

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openABACUS editor

D'autres publications dans: Kronos: revista universitaria de la actividad física y el deporte

Résumé

The Flipped Classroom (FLIP) methodology has certain special features that favour teacher-student interaction through Information and Communication Technologies (TIC), it makes knowledges assimilate more deeply. The main objective or this study is to compare academic performance and students motivation of FLIP strategy with the traditional one (TRAD) in physical education. In order to carry out this research, a total of 51 students aged between 15 and 16 took body realized a pre-test of basketball knowledge, a post-test after applying the methodology and a pre and post motivation questionnaire (CMEF). The control group (TRAD) carried out the exercises in a traditional way and for the experimental group (FLIP) was used the EdPuzzle educational platform. The results show that, in the first place, it was not possible to make a comparison abut inter-group progress, since the difference between the two was significant (p<0. 05), so was carried out an intragroup analysis, the results evidence that both groups improved regarding the pre-test, regardless of sex, and in terms of motivation, were not reflected significant (p>0. 05) for both sexes, except the group male TRAD, that improved. As a conclusion, the FLIP methodology has not contributed more benefits in motivation, nor in the teaching-learning process of the students, obtaining similar results to less active methodologies.

Références bibliographiques

  • Baena, A. (2008). Temario de Oposiciones de Secundaria para el área de Educación Física. Granada.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bing, Z. (2017). A survey analysis of the network flipped classroom model application in the optimization of the university physical education classroom system. Boletín Técnico/Technical Bulletin, 55(19), 413-418.
  • Bukowsky, M., Faigenbaum, A.D., y Myer, G.D. (2013). Fundamental integrative training (FIT) for physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 85(6), 23–30. doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2014.926842
  • Carratala Sánchez, E. (2004). Análisis de la teoría de metas de logro y de la autodeterminación en los planos de especialización deportiva de la Generalitat Valenciana. Valencia: Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de psicología. Universitat de València. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10803/10183
  • Davies, D. B. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-lev-el information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580. doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
  • Deci, E. L., y Ryan, R.M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  • Dweck, C.S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 674-685. doi.org/10.1037/h0077149
  • Ferriz Valero, A., Sebastià Amat, S. y García Martínez, S. (2017). Clase invertida como elemento innovador en Educación Física: efectos sobre la motivación y la adquisición de aprendizajes en Primaria y Bachillerato. En R. Roig-Vila (Ed.), Investigación en docencia universitaria. Diseñando el futuro a partir de la innovación educativa (pp. 200-215). Universidad de Alicante, España: Editorial Octaedro en Barcelona. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10045/71112
  • Galway, L.P., Corbett, K K., Takaro, T.K., Tairyan, K., y Frank, E. (2014). A Novel Integration of Online and Flipped Classroom Instructional Models in Public Health Higher Education. BMC Medical Education, 14, 181. doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-181
  • García, I. G., Lemus, N. C., y Morales, P. T. (2015). Las flipped classroom a través del smartphone: efectos de su experimentación en educación física secundaria. Prisma Social 15, 296-352.
  • Goodwin, B., y Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 78-80.
  • Guardia, F.J. (2002). Las nuevas tecnologías, la educación física y su integración en el tercer y cuarto nivel de concreción curricular. XX Congreso Nacional de Educación Física. Guadalajara: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.
  • Iborra, M., Eliana, R., Badía, J. H., Bringué, R., y Tejero, J. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom methodology to the subject “Applied computing” of the chemical engineering degree at the University of Barcelona. Journal of Technology and Science Education 7(2), 119-135. doi.org/10.3926/jotse.244
  • Jensen, J.L., Kummer, T.A., y Godoy, P.D. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1-12). doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129
  • Lowell, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. ASEE Annual Conference. Atlanta.
  • Maehr, M.L., Braskamp, L.A. (1986). The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment. Lexington, MA, England.
  • Moffett, J., y Mill, A.C. (2014). Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary profes-sional skills course. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5, 415–425. doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S70160
  • Moreno Murcia, J., Hernández Paños, A., y González-Cutre Coll, D. (2009). Complementando la teoría de la autodeterminación con las metas sociales: un estudio sobre la diversión en educación física. Revista Mexicana de Psicología 26 (2), 213-222.
  • Moreno, J.A., y Martínez, A. (2006). Importancia de la Teoría de la Autodeterminación en la práctica físico-deportiva: Fundamentos e implicaciones prácticas. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 6(2), 39-54.
  • Nicholls, J. (1978). The Development of the Concepts of Effort and Ability, Perception of Academic Attainment, and the Understanding That Difficult Tasks Require More Ability. Child Development, 49(3), 800-814. doi.org/10.2307/1128250
  • Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom; for active, effective and increased achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z
  • Papadopoulos C., Santiago-Román, A.I., y Portela, G. (2010). Developing and implementing an Inverted Classroom for Engineering Statics. Conference Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Washington DC. doi.org/10.1109/fie.2010.5673198
  • Pierce, R. y Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 76(10). doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610196
  • Ruano Arriagada, K. (2006). El cuerpo y el movimiento: aspectos cognoscitivos, comunicativos y creativos (pp. 60-79). En Cachadiña Casco, M.P., Rodríguez Terrón, J.J. y Ruano Arriagada, K. (2006). Expresión corporal en clase de educación física. Sevilla: Wanceulen.
  • Ryan, R.M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality 63(3), 397-427. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x
  • Ryan, R.M., y Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Sadaghiani, H. R. (2012). Online prelectures: An alternative to textbook reading assignments. The Physics Teacher, 50(5), 301-303. doi.org/10.1119/1.3703549
  • Sánchez Oliva, D., Leo Marcos, F.M., Amado Alonso, D., González Ponce, I., y García Calvo, T. (2012). Desarrollo de un cuestionario para valorar la motivación en educación física. Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte, 7(2), 227-250.
  • Tune, J., Sturek, M. y Basile, D. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in physiology education, 37(4), 316-320. doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013
  • Vallerand, R.J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271-360). New York: Academic Press. doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
  • Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. En G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 263-319). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. doi.org/10.12691/ajap-5-1-2
  • Vallerand, R.J. y Rousseau, F.L. (2001). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise: a review using the Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. In R. N. Singer, H.A. Hausenblas y C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology, pp. 389-416. New York: Wiley.
  • Villatoro, J. (2010). La competencia digital docente en la enseñanza y aprendizaje de idiomas. I Encuentros virtuales Comunidad Todoele. Recuperado de https://webconf.vc.dfn.de/p50445507
  • Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
La source de données: Dialnet