Actitudes y prácticas de la población en relación al etiquetado de tipo “semáforo nutricional” en Ecuador

  1. Patricio David Ramos Padilla 1
  2. Tannia Valeria Carpio Arias 1
  3. Verónica Carlina Delgado López 1
  4. Verónica Dayana Villavicencio Barriga 1
  5. Carlos Eduardo Andrade 1
  6. José Fernández-Sáez 2
  1. 1 Grupo de Investigación en Alimentación y Nutrición Humana, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Ecuador
  2. 2 Grupo de Investigación de Salud Pública, Universidad de Alicante, España
Revista:
Revista española de nutrición humana y dietética

ISSN: 2173-1292

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 21

Número: 2

Páginas: 121-129

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14306/RENHYD.21.2.306 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de nutrición humana y dietética

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Introduction: Choosing food is critical to the health of populations. Strategies such as labeling rules in products could help consumers to have clear information on the food they eat. Objectives: To explore the association of sex and age with the attitudes and practices with regard to the ‘traffic light’-style nutritional labeling in Ecuador. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in a convenience sample of 622 subjects of both sexes in 6 supermarkets in the urban area of Riobamba from September 2014 to February 2015. Differences of proportions and logistic regression hypotheses were tested to determine the association of attitudes and practices with sex and age. Results: Men with respect to women (OR=1.58; 95%CI:1.13–2.21; p<0.001) and participants aged 18-40 years with respect to those aged >40 years (OR=1.72; 95%CI:1.22–2.44; p=0.002) are more likely to believe that there is currently too much pressure to eat healthily. Likewise, men are less likely to believe that they consume too much fat (OR=0.61; 95%CI:0.43–0.85; p=0.01) compared to women. Participants aged between 18-40 years are more likely to try to minimize the amount of sugar (OR=2.41; 95%CI:1.55–3.76; p<0.001), sal (OR=2.24; 95%CI:1.50–3.60; p<0.001) and fat consuming (OR=2.17; 95%CI:1.44-3.27; p<0.001) vs. 40 years. Conclusions: The attitudes and practices of the population regarding the ‘traffic light’-style nutritional labeling can vary with respect to age and sex.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • (1) Ollberding NJ, Wolf RL, Contento I. Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(8):1233-7.
  • (2) Robinson E, Thomas J, Aveyard P, Higgs S. What everyone else is eating: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of informational eating norms on eating behavior. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(3):414-29.
  • (3) Babio N, López L, Salas-Salvadó J. Análisis de la capacidad de elección de alimentos saludables por parte de los consumidores en referencia a dos modelos de etiquetado nutricional; estudio cruzado. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28(1):173-81.
  • (4) Loria V, Pérez A, Fernández C, Villarino M, Rodríguez D, Zurita L, et al. Análisis de las encuestas sobre etiquetado nutricional realizadas en el Hospital La Paz de Madrid durante la 9a edición del «Día Nacional de la Nutrición (DNN) 2010». Nutr Hosp. 2011;26(1):97-106.
  • (5) Ministerio de Salud Pública (Ecuador). Reglamento de Etiquetado de Alimentos Procesados para el Consumo Humano. Registro Oficial Suplemento 318, 2014, Acuerdo Ministerial 5103.
  • (6) Borgmeier I, Westenhoefer J. Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:184.
  • (7) Trudel R, Murray KB, Kim S, Chen S. The impact of traffic light color-coding on food health perceptions and choice. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015;21(3):255-75.
  • (8) Larrivee S, Greenway FL, Johnson WD. A Statistical Analysis of a Traffic-Light Food Rating System to Promote Healthy Nutrition and Body Weight. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9(6):1336-41.
  • (9) Orozco F, Ochoa D, Muquinche M, Padro M, Melby CL. Awareness, Comprehension, and Use of Newly Mandated Nutrition Labels Among Mestiza and Indigenous Ecuadorian Women in the Central Andes Region of Ecuador. Food Nutr Bull. 2016;379572116684730.
  • (10) Claro RM, Linders H, Ricardo CZ, Legetic B, Campbell NRC. Consumer attitudes, knowledge, and behavior related to salt consumption in sentinel countries of the Americas. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;32(4):265-73.
  • (11) Freire WB, Ramírez MJ, Belmont P, Mendieta MJ, Silva MK, Romero N, et al. RESUMEN EJECUTIVO. TOMO I. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición del Ecuador. ENSANUT-ECU 2011-2013. Quito, Ecuador: Ministerio de Salud Pública/Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos; 2013.
  • (12) Bermudez OI, Tucker KL. Trends in dietary patterns of Latin American populations. Cad Saude Publica. 2003;19(Suppl 1):S87-99.
  • (13) Dirección de Estadísticas Socidemográficas. Anuario de Nacimientos y Defunciones en El Ecuador 2013. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos; 2014.
  • (14) Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, Fahimi S, Lim S, Andrews KG, et al. Global, regional, and national consumption levels of dietary fats and oils in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys. BMJ. 2014;348:g2272.
  • (15) World Health Organization. Reducing salt intake in populations : report of a WHO forum and technical meeting, 5-7 October 2006, Paris, France. World Health Organization; 2007.
  • (16) Jackson SL, King SMC, Zhao L, Cogswell ME. Prevalence of Excess Sodium Intake in the United States - NHANES, 2009-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;64(52):1393-7.
  • (17) Lankhorst S, Baelde HJ, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Smedts FMM, Danser AHJ, van den Meiracker AH. Effect of high salt diet on blood pressure and renal damage during vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition with sunitinib. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(6):914-21.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet