Why should we care about sound symbolism in EFL learning?two pilot studies

  1. Roig-Marín, Amanda 1
  1. 1 University of Cambridge
    info

    University of Cambridge

    Cambridge, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/013meh722

Revue:
IJES: international journal of English studies

ISSN: 1578-7044,  1989-6131

Année de publication: 2017

Volumen: 17

Número: 1

Pages: 17-36

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/IJES/2017/1/264551 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

D'autres publications dans: IJES: international journal of English studies

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

Given the importance of the phonological and lexical components of the language in L2 learning, this article discusses an innovative, holistic approach to learning these two components of the language based on the existence of “sound symbolism”—the interrelation between sound and meaning—in English. In particular, it describes how and why the study of sound symbolism can be advantageous to EFL learners. This claim is grounded in empirical data gathered from two pilot studies carried out in two educational settings (a secondary school and the University of Alicante). The results suggest that knowledge of sound symbolic principles underlying the English language can enhance lexical storage and semantic prediction

Références bibliographiques

  • Aitchison, J. (1993). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychometric bulletin & review, 4, 439–461.
  • Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language learning, 52, 323–363.
  • Barcroft, J. (2004). Theoretical and methodological issues in research on semantic and structural elaboration in lexical acquisition. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form–meaning connections in SLA (pp. 219–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Boers, F., Eyckmans, J. & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language teaching research, 11(1), 43–62.
  • Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., Littlemore, J., Stengers, H. & Eyckmans, J. (2008). Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 189–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Boers, F. & Littlemore, J. (2000). Cognitive style variables in participants’ explanations of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and symbol, 15, 177–187.
  • Boers, F., Piquer, A., Stengers, H. & Eyckmans, J. (2009). Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms? Language teaching research, 13(4), 367–382.
  • Brown, R. & McNeill, D. (1966). The ‘tip of the tongue’ phenomenon. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 5(4), 325–337.
  • Carling, G. & Johansson, N. (2014). Motivated language change: processes involved in the growth and conventionalization of onomatopoeia and sound symbolism. Acta linguistica hafniensia, 46(2), 199–217.
  • Dale, E. & O’Rourke, J. (1986). Vocabulary building: A process approach. Columbus, OH: ZanerBloser.
  • Deconinck, J., Boers, F. & Eyckmans J. (2017). ‘Does the form of this word fit its meaning?’ The effect of learner-generated mapping elaborations on L2 word recall. Language teaching research, 21(1), 31–53.
  • Emmott, S. (2013, June 30). Humans: the real threat to life on Earth. The Guardian. Retrieved 3 December, 2016.
  • Firth, J. (1930). Speech. London: Ernest Benn.
  • Harmon, J. M., Buckelew-Martin, E. & Wood, K. (2010). The cognitive vocabulary approach to word learning. English journal, 100(1), 100–107.
  • Heaney, S. (2000). Beowulf: A new verse translation. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J. J. (Eds.). (1994). Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krause, T. A. (2015). Sound effects: Age, gender, and sound symbolism in American English. Dissertations and Theses, paper 2304. Master Dissertation, Portland State University. Retrieved 3 December, 2016 from pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3306& context=open_access_etds.
  • Laufer, B. & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied linguistics, 29, 694–716.
  • Lu-hua, D. (2004). Iconicity in lexicon and English vocabulary teaching. Journal of Huaihua University, 6. Retrieved 3 December, 2016.
  • Luk, G. & Bialystok, E. (2005). How iconic are Chinese characters? Bilingualism language and cognition, 8(1), 79–83.
  • Mompeán-Guillamón, P. (2013). Sound symbolism and pronunciation teaching: A suitable match? In J. A. Mompeán-González & J. Fouz (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on English Pronunciation: Issues & practices (EPIP3) (pp. 77–80). Murcia: University of Murcia.
  • Mompeán-Guillamón, P. (2015). Sound symbolism and pronunciation teaching: A preliminary study. In J. A. Mompeán & J. Fouz (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions (pp. 243–259). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Monaghan, P., Mattock, K. & Walker, P. (2012). The role of sound symbolism in language learning. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 38(5), 1152– 1164.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Parault, S. J. (2002). Sound symbolism: A possible piece in the puzzle of word learning. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, United States. Retrieved 3 December, 2016.
  • Parault, S. J. & Parkinson, M. (2008). Sound symbolic word learning in the middle grades. Contemporary educational psychology, 33(4), 647–671.
  • Parault, S. J. & Schwanenflugel, P. (2006). Sound-symbolism: A piece in the puzzle of word learning. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 35(4), 329–351.
  • Reid, D. (1967). Sound symbolism. Edinburgh: T. & A. Constable.
  • Schank, R. C. (1972). Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive psychology, 3, 552–631.
  • Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 12, 329–363.
  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Key issues in teaching and learning vocabulary. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello Contesse & M. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 28–40). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Turnbull, J. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Webb, S. (2007). Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: The effects of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language teaching research, 11, 63–81.
  • Williams, A. & Baines, M. (2013). Bridges for 1º de bachillerato. Limassol: Burlington Books.
  • Wrembel, M. (2010). Sound symbolism in foreign language phonological acquisition. Research in language, 8, 1–14.
  • Xin, L. & Jing, L. (2008). The application of lexical iconicity to English vocabulary teaching. Journal of Harbin University, 8. Retrieved 3 December, 2016.
  • Yanqun, H. (2007). Iconicity in vocabulary and its enlightenment on English vocabulary teaching. Journal of Changchun University of science and technology (higher education edition), 1. Retrieved 3 December, 2016.
  • Zohrabi, M., Sabouri, H. & Peimanfar, S. (2014). Intermediate level learners’ vocabulary guessing and recognizing through sound symbolism. International journal of applied linguistics and English literature, 3(6), 42–52.
La source de données: Dialnet