Efectos del uso de contenedor profundo en quercus suber. Resultados preliminares de un proyecto de transferencia de tecnología (Sierra Calderona, España)
- Muñoz, Julio César 1
- Chirino Miranda, Esteban 2
- Vargas Burgos, Julio César 1
- Ríos, Pedro 1
- Cerda Martínez, Vicent 3
- Martínez Llisto, Jesús 3
- Villamar Torres, Ronald Oswaldo 4
-
1
Universidad Estatal Amazónica
info
- 2 Unidad mixta de Investigación Universidad de Alicante-Fundación CEAM. Alicante
- 3 Investigadores del Centro para la Investigación y Experimentación Forestal (CIEF)- Valencia
- 4 Becario SENESCYT (Secretaria Nacional de Educación Superior Ciencia y Tecnología e Innovación)
ISSN: 1390-5600, 1390-5600
Datum der Publikation: 2014
Ausgabe: 3
Nummer: 2
Seiten: 140-160
Art: Artikel
Andere Publikationen in: Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología
Zusammenfassung
The forest container determines the morph-functional characteristics of saplings in general, the quality of plants produced. Dispose of a long main root in plants produced can determine its survival in regions with strong hydric constrains. Technology transfer is a way to bring society the investigations result. This study shows the preliminary results of a project on technology transfer Natural Park Sierra Calderona (Castellón, Spain). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the utilization of a deep container on growth and biomass distribution of Quercus Suber during cultivation in vivarium; as well as to evaluate during the first year its adaptation to the field in alcornocales degraded of the Nature Reserve. For a year, saplings of Quercus Suber L were grown in greenhouse in two types of containers CCS-18 (short, 18 cm depth) and CCL-30 (length, 30 cm depth). They were then transplanted into three experimental plots of degraded scrub. The results at the end of nursery crop indicated morphological differences (stem height and biomass) among the saplings grown in deep container (CCL-30) and container of standard depth (CCS-18). After a first year planting (preliminary result), survival was high (87.5%), although no differences were observed between treatments.