La mediación: ¿una alternativa real al proceso penal?

  1. Carmen Cuadrado Salinas
Journal:
Revista electrónica de ciencia penal y criminología

ISSN: 1695-0194

Year of publication: 2015

Issue: 17

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista electrónica de ciencia penal y criminología

Abstract

The aim of the Restorative Justice, as an alternative method to the traditional judicial process, is to repair the harm caused to the victim, improving victim satisfaction, encouraging the offender to think about the impact of their offending and reduce reoffending instead of seeking the punishment for the perpetrator. However, the choice for the legislator to include that kind of justice in a particular legal system is not free from doubt and uncertainty. Although Victim Offender Mediation programs, have been applied successfully in many countries for over two decades, and remains the subject of a great literary flow, both theoretically and statistically, what seems certain is that we are in front of an alternative formula of criminal justice still unfinished. The option for Restorative Justice Methods such as VOM raises procedural issues of great concern, especially in relation to the risk of abandonment of the legal rights and procedural safeguards of the accused, but also in relation to the safety of the victim. This article analyzes whether the option -if accepted- by the Victim-Offender Mediation should be seen as a real alternative to the current Justice System, or whether it should be seen as a branch of the current System of Justice that could be diverted for the purpose of giving a fairest and more effective solution to the criminal action committed, bearing in mind the public interest in such a solution, and not only -but also-, the interest of the parties involved in it.

Bibliographic References

  • ADAMS, A., “Restorative Justice, Responsive Regulation, and Democratic Government”, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, March 2004, vol. XXXI, Nº 1.
  • BERND-DIETER MEIER, “Restorative Justice-A New Paradigm in Criminal Law?”, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 6/2, 1998.
  • BOSTAPH, LISA G./ COOPER, JOHATHON A./ HATCH, V. “Review of Research on Alternatives to Incarceration for Adults”, ICJC Report, 2008.
  • BRAITHWAITE, J. “Restorative Justice and SocialJustice”, Saskatchewan Law Review, vol. 63, 2000.
  • BRAITHWAITE, J. Restorative Justice, ed. Oxford University Press, 1998.
  • BRAITHWAITE, J., “Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts”, Crime and Justice Nº 25, 1999.
  • DOOLIN, K., “But What Does It Mean? Seeking Definitional Clarity in Restorative Justice”, Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 71, 2006-2007.
  • EGLASH, A., Beyond Restitution: Creative Restitution. Ed. Lexinton Books, United States of America, 1977. Abstract disponible en https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=47998
  • FERNÁNDEZ LÓPEZ, M., Prueba y presunción de inocencia, ed. IUSTEL, Madrid, 2005.
  • GRAVIELIDES, T. Restorative Justice Theory and Practice: Addressing the Discrepancy, ed. European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, Helsinky, 2007.
  • LOGAN, C., “Restorative Justice: Encouraging More Meaningful Engagement with the Criminal Justice System”, University College Dublin Law Review, vol. 13, 2013.
  • MARSHALL, T.F., Restorative Justice. An Overview disponible en www.homeoffice.gov.uk 1999.
  • PASCUAL RODRIGUEZ, E., “La experiencia práctica de la mediación penal en Madrid”, en Justicia restaurativa, mediación penal y penitenciaria: un renovado impulso, (AAVV), (Coord. Margarita Martinez Escamilla y María Pilar Sánchez Álvarez), ed. REUS, Madrid 2011.
  • RIOS MARTÍN, J.C., (et al.),La mediación penal y penitenciaria, ed. Colex, 3 edición, 2012.
  • RIZO GÓMEZ, B., “El ejercicio de la acción civil en el proceso penal”, en La reforma del proceso penal (Dir. José María Asencio Mellado), ed. La Ley, Madrid 2011.
  • SHAPLAND, J. (et al.), “Situating Restorative Justice Within Criminal Justice”, en Theoretical Criminology, vol. 10 (4), Sage Publications, 2006.
  • SHERMAN, L.W., (et al.), “Are Restorative Justice Conferences Effective in Reducing Repeat Offending? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review”, disponible en version on-line en: http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/168/art%253A10.1007%252Fs10940- 014-9222-9.pdf?auth66=1399022164_cd9fc07a1f1a71b7084ef6db43ae964e&ext=.pdf
  • SHERMAN, L.W., (et al.), “Effects of Face-to-Face Restorative Justice on Victims of Crime in Four Randomized, Controlled Trials”, Journal of Experimental Criminology, vol. 1, 2005.
  • VAN NESS, D.W., “An Overview of Restorative Justice Around the World”, Report Enhancing Justice Reform, Incluinding Restorative Justice de 22 abril de 2005 incluido en el 11 Congreso de las Naciones Unidas para la Prevención del Delito y Justicia penal, www.icclr.law.ubc.ca.