Propuesta de diagnóstico de Síndrome Post Mutilación Genital Femenina

  1. Jiménez-Ruiz, Ismael
  2. Almansa Martínez, Pilar 1
  3. Juall Carpenito, Lynda
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

ISSN: 1695-6141

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 16

Número: 1

Páginas: 51-59

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/EGLOBAL.16.1.263331 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Objective: To develop a nursing diagnosis for the detection and prevention of FGM.Methods: The creation of this diagnosis is based on exhaustive bibliographic research of databases such as LILACS, CUIDEN, TESEO y Web of Sciencie; as well as other documentary sources from international entities.Results: Post Female Genital Mutilation Syndrome is defined as: Deterioration of a range of health domains as a result of female genital mutilation.This diagnosis belongs to domain 11: safety/protection and class 3: violence.The following defining characteristics are established for this diagnosis: Acute phase, chronic responses physical, sexuality, chronic obstetric alterations and psychological responses.Conclusions: Via the diagnosis presented herein, early detection might be procured by nursing professionals of those women and young girls having undergone this traditional practice, thereby being able to treat any possible resultant sequelae.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 1. UNICEF. UNICEF´s data work on FGM/C. [Online]. 2016. Advailable at: http://www.unicef.org/media/files/FGMC_2016_brochure_final_UNICEF_SPREAD. pdf
  • 2. Grande Gascón, M; Ruiz Seisdedos, S & Hernández Padilla, M. El Abordaje Social y Político de la Mutilación Genital Femenina. Portularia. 2013; XIII(1): 11-18. Advailable at: http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10272/6742/El_abordaje_social_y_po litico.pdf?sequence=2
  • 3. CIE. Declaración de posición del CIE: Eliminación de la mutilación genital femenina. 2010. Advailable at: http://www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/publications/position_statements/A04_ Eliminacion_mutilacion_genital_femenina-Sp.pdf
  • 4. NANDA International. Diagnósticos Enfermeros. Definiciones y clasificaciones 2015-2017.Barcelona: Elsevier. 2015. pp.464
  • 5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top Guideline Female Genital Mutilation and its management. 2015; (53): 1-26. Advailable at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-53-fgm.pdf
  • 6. Abdulcadir, J; Margairazb, C; Boulvaina, M & Iriona, O. Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2011: 6. doi:10.4414/smw.2010.13137
  • 7. Kaplan, A; Hechavarría, S; Martín, M & Bonhiure, I. Health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia, evidence into action. Reproductive Health. 2011; 8(26): 1-6. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-8-26
  • 8. Almroth, L; Bedri, H; El Musharaf, S; Satti, A; Idris, T;M SIR K & .Bergstrom, S. Urogenital Complications among Girls with Genital Mutilation: A hospital-Based Study in Khartoum. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2005; 9(2): 118-123.
  • 9. Khaled, K; Samy, S; Abed El-Aziz, E & Haytham, H. Impacts of Female Genital Mutilation on Women’s Reproductive Health. Comumunity Medicine & Health Education. 2012; 2(3): 1-4.
  • 10. Iavazzo, C; Gkegkes, I & Sardi, T. Female genital mutilation and infections: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Archives Gynecology Obstetrics. 2013; 287(6): 1137-1149. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2708-5
  • 11. Amin, M; Rasheed, S & Salem, E. Lower urinary tract symptoms following female genital mutilation. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013; 123(1): 21-23. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.010
  • 12. Elnashar, A & Abdelhady, R. The impact of female genital cutting on health of newly married women. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2007; 97(3): 238-244. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.03.008
  • 13. Andersson, S; Rymer , J; Joyce, D; Momoh, C & Gayle, C. Sexual quality of life in women who have undergone female genital mutilation: a case-control study.BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2012; 119(13): 1606-11. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12004
  • 14. WHO. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. The Lancet. 2006;367: 1835-1841. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68805-3
  • 15. Berg , R & Underland, V. The Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2013; (1): 1-15. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/496564
  • 16. Frega, A; Puzio, G; Maniglio, P; Catalano, A; Milazzo, G; Lombardi, D & Bianchi, P. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women with FGM I and II in San Camillo Hospital, Burkina Faso. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2013; 288(3): 513- 519. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2779-y.
  • 17. Chibber , R; El-Saleh , E & El Harmi, J. Female circumcision: obstetrical and psychological sequelae continues unabated in the 21st century. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2011; 24(6): 833-836. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.531318
  • 18. Behrendt, A & Moritz, S. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Memory Problems After Female Genital Mutilation Female Genital Mutilation. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2005; 162(5): 1000-1002. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.1000
  • 19. Vloeberghs, E; Van der Kwaak , A; Knipscheer , J & Van den Muijsenbergh , M. Coping and chronic psychosocial consequences of female genital mutilation in The Netherlands. Ethnicity & Health. 2012; 17(6): 677-695. doi:10.1080/13557858.2013.771148.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet