Pensamiento científico-creativo y rendimiento académico

  1. Bermejo García, María Rosario
  2. Sainz Gómez, Marta
  3. María José Ruíz 1
  4. Ferrándiz García, Carmen
  5. Soto Martínez, Gloria
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Revista:
Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

ISSN: 2386-7418

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 1

Número: 1

Páginas: 64-72

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17979/REIPE.2014.1.1.24 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

http://revistas.udc.es/index.php/reipe/article/view/24El objetivo del trabajo es estudiar la relación del constructo de pensamiento científico-creativo con el rendimiento académico en una muestra de alumnos adolescentes. Además de ello, se analizará la fiabilidad de la prueba de pensamiento científico-creativo que se va a utilizar en el presente trabajo. En el estudio participaron 98 estudiantes (12-16 años) de un instituto de Educación Secundaria de la Región de Murcia (España). Los instrumentos utilizados fueron: a) el test de Pensamiento Científico-Creativo (Hu y Adey, 2002); adaptado en nuestro país por el Equipo de Altas Habilidades de la Universidad de Murcia. El test consta de 7 tareas que se fundamentan en el Modelo Estructural de la Creatividad Científica (SCSM, Scientific Creativity Structure Model; Hu y Adey, 2002); mediante este test se valoran las dimensiones de fluidez, flexibilidad y originalidad; b) el test de Inteligencia General y Factorial (IGF/5r; Yuste, 2002), que evalúa las habilidades de Inteligencia General y Factorial, razonamiento lógico, razonamiento verbal, razonamiento numérico y razonamiento espacial; y c) el rendimiento académico de los alumnos por ámbitos (científico-tecnológico, lingüístico-social y artístico). Los resultados mostraron relaciones positivas y estadísticamente significativas entre las tareas de la prueba de creatividad científica y el rendimiento académico en los diferentes ámbitos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bermejo, M.R., Prieto, M.D., Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando, M., Ruiz, M.J., & Soto, G. (2013, en prensa aceptado). Creatividad científica: dominio general o específico. Sobredotaçao.
  • Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of Activity-based Elementary Science on Student Outcomes: A Quantitative Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 499-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004499
  • Bredderman, T. (1985). Laboratory programs for elementary school science: A meta analysis of effects of learning. Science Education, 69, 577-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690413
  • Butler, M. B. (1999). Factors Associated with Students’ Intentions to Engage in Science Learning Activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 455-473.
  • Cheng, V.M.Y. (2004). Developing physics learning activities for fostering student creativity in Hong Kong context. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 5(2), Artículo recuperado de http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v5_issue2/chengmy/
  • Dillashaw, F.G., & Okey, J.R. (1980). Test of the integrated science process skills for secondary science students. Science Education, 64, 601-608.
  • Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific Thinking and Reasoning. En K. J., Holyoak, & R. G., Morrison (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp.705-726). Cambridge University Press.
  • Ergül, R., Simsekly, Y., Çallis, S., & Özdilek, Z. (2011). The Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching on Elementary School Students’ Science Process Skills and Science Attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 5(1), 48-68.
  • Froit, F. E. (1976). Curriculum experiences and movement from concrete to operational thought. In John W. Renner, & Donals G. Stafford, Research, teaching, and learning with the Piaget model. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of the evidence in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 791-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180705
  • Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1419699
  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
  • Haladyna, T., & Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Attitudes toward science: a quantitative synthesis. Science Education, 66(4), 547-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660406
  • Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.) (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and Procedures for Assessing Science Process Skills and Practice. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 129-144.
  • Hoover, S. M. (1994). Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth- grade students. Rooper Review, 16(3), 156–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553563
  • Hoover, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation ability of gifted ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 838-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.82.4.838
  • Hu, W., & Adey, P. A (2002). Scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
  • Innamorato, G. (1998). Creativity in the development of scientific giftedness: educational implications. Roeper Review, 21(1), 54-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553932
  • Kazeni, M. (2005). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills for the further education and training. Tesis Doctoral University of Pretoria: South Africa.
  • Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90007-9
  • Lavinghousez, W.E., Jr. (1973). The analysis of the Biology Readiness Scale (BRS), as a measure of inquiry skills required in BSCS Biology. College of education, University of central Florida.
  • Liang, J. (2002). Exploring scientific creativity of eleventh grade students in Taiwan. Unpublished PhD thesis. The University of Texas at Austin.
  • Ludeman. R. R. (1975). Development of the Science Processes Test (TSPT). Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University. MI.
  • McLeod, R.J., Berkheimer, G.G., Fyffe, D.W., & Robinson, R.W. (1975). The Development of Criterion-validated Test items for four Integrated Science Processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 415-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660120413
  • Meador, K. S. (2003). Thinking creatively about science suggestions for primary teachers. Gifted Child Today, 26(1), 25-29.
  • Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond Processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057268708559938
  • Millar, R., Lubben, F., Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1994). Investigating in the school laboratory: Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge and their Influence on Performance. Research Papers in Education, 9(2), 207-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267152940090205
  • Molitor, L.L., & George, K.D. (1976). Development of a Test of Science Process Skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13(5), 405-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660130504
  • Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science: The implications of children’s science. Auckland, London: Heinemann publishers.
  • Ostlund, K. (1998). What the Research Says About Science Process Skills. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2, 1-8. http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7589/5356
  • Onwu, G. O. M., & Mozube, B. (1992). Development and validation of a science process skills test for secondary science students. Journal of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 27(2), 37-43.
  • Padilla, M.J., Mckenzie, D.L., & Shaw, E.L. (1986). An Examination of the line graphing skills Ability of students in grades seven through twelve. School Science and Mathematics, 86(1), 20-29.
  • Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. (2003). A miniature Guide for Students and Faculty to Scientific Thinking. Based on Critical Thinking Concepts & Principles. On-line: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  • Pekmez, E.S., Aktamis, H., & Taskin, B.C. (2009). Exploring Scientific Creativity of 7TH Grade Students. Journal of Qafqaz University, 26, 204-214.
  • Prieto, M. D., Ferrando, M., Hernández, D., & Sainz, M. (2011a). Cómo formar pequeños científicos. Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia.
  • Prieto, M. D., Ferrando, M., Hernández, D., & Sainz, M. (2011b). Pensamiento científico en el contexto escolar. Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia.
  • Riley. J. W. (1972). The Development and Use of a Group Process Test for Selected Processes of the science Curriculum Improvement Study. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University. MI.
  • Ruiz, M. J., Bermejo, M. R., Prieto, M. D., Ferrándiz, C., & Almeida, L. S. (2013). Evaluación del Pensamiento Científico-Creativo: Adaptación y validación de una prueba en población española. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 21(1), 175-194.
  • Sak, U., & Ayas, B. (2011). Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55, 316-329. http://usak.home.anadolu.edu.tr/documents/CSATpsyctestsasssmodl2013.pdf
  • Simon, M.S., & Zimmerman, J.M. (1990). Science and writing. Science and Children, 18(3), 7-8.
  • Shann, M.H. (1977). Evaluation of Interdisciplinary Problem Solving Curriculum in elementary Science and Mathematics. Science Education, 61, 491-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730610405
  • Tannenbaum, R.S. (1971). Development of the Test of Science Processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(2), 123-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660080206
  • Temiz, B. K., Taşar, M.F., & Tan, M. (2006). Development and validation of a multiple format test of science process skills. International Education Journal, 7(7), 1007-1027.
  • Tipps, S. (1982). Formal Operational Thinking of gifted students in grades 5, 6, 7, and 8. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI.
  • Tobin, K.G., & Capie, W. (1982). Development and Validation of a Group Test of Integrated Science Process Skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(2), 133-141.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking - Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition - Verbal Tests, Forms A and B - Figural Tests Forms A and B. Princeton N. J: Personnel Press.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Beaconville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.
  • Yuste, C. (2002). IGF/5r. Inteligencia General y Factorial. Manual Técnico Formas A y B. Madrid: EOS.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet