Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para valorar las preferencias y satisfacciones en jóvenes jugadores de baloncesto

  1. Ortega Toro, Enrique
  2. Giménez Egido, José María
  3. Palao Andrés, José Manuel
Zeitschrift:
Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1578-8423,  1989-5879

Datum der Publikation: 2008

Ausgabe: 8

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 39-58

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Andere Publikationen in: Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

Zusammenfassung

The objective of the present study was to design and validate a valid and reliable instrument for measuring various aspects of youth basketball players at different stages: a) the level of athletic enjoyment and diversion of various game situations, technical and tactical actions, means for basic team tactics, types of offense and defense, rule modifications and game phases both in practice sessions as well as in games; and b) the perception of the players of their coaches' demands in game phases and in certain technical and tactical actions. First, a validation of the content was done though the agreement and consensus of twelve expert judges. Secondly, 33 under-16 basketball players filled out a questionnaire and after a week, they filled it out again. The reliability was calculated through the application of a test-retest. The results indicated that the questionnaire about the satisfaction and preferences of youth basketball players has optimal levels of reliability and validity, while registering the level of satisfaction, athletic enjoyment and diversion in athletic practice of youth basketball players in formative stages.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman and Hall.
  • Atkinson G. & Nevill A (2000). Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science: Correspondence. Sport Medicine, 5(1), 375-381.
  • Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Aramburu, M. (2007) La adaptación de instrumentos de medida de unas culturas a otras: una perspectiva práctica. Psiocothema. 1(19): 124-133.
  • Baumgartner, T. A. (2000). Estimating the stability reliability of a store. Measurement in Physical Education and exercise Science, 4(3), 175-178.
  • Bland, J. M. & Altman, D. G. (1996). Measurement error. British Medical Journal, 29, 312.
  • Bulger, S. M. & Housner, L. D. (2007). Modified delphi investigation of exercise science in physical education teacher education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 57-80
  • Carretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(3), 521-551.
  • Conroy, D. E., & Metzler, J. (2003). Temporal stability of performance failure appraisal inventory items. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7(4), 243-261.
  • Duda, J. L. (1996). Maximizing motivation in sport and physical education among children and adolescents: the case for greater task involvement. Quest, 48, 290-302.
  • Dunn, J. G., Bouffard, M., & Rogers, W. T. (1999). Assessing Item Content-Relevance in Sport Psychology Scale-Construction Research: Issues and Recommendations. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3(1), 15-36.
  • Fernández, P. & Diaz, P. (2004). La fiabilidad de las mediciones clínicas: el análisis de concordancia para variables numéricas. Atención primaria en la red, 1-11 (Disponible en http://www.fisterra.com/mbe/investiga/conc_numerica/conc_numerica.pdf).
  • Fernández, E., Sánchez, F., y Salinero, J. J. (2008). Validación y adaptación de la escala PACES de disfrute con la práctica de la actividad física para adolescentes españolas. Psicothema, 20(4), 890-895.
  • Garn, A. C., & Cothran, D. J. (2006). The fun factor in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(3), 281-297
  • González, G., Tabernero, B., & Márquez, S. (2000). Análisis de los motivos para participar en fútbol y en tenis en la iniciación deportiva. Motricidad: revista de ciencias de la actividad física y del deporte, 6, 47-66.
  • Macfarlane, D., & Kwong, W. T. (2003). Children's heart rates and enjoyment levels during PE classes in hong kong primary schools. Pediatric Exercise Science, 15(2), 179-190.
  • Mandingo, J. L., & Couture, R. T. (1996). An overview of the components of fun in physical education, organized sport and physical activity programs, Avante, 2(3), 56-72.
  • Marrero, G., Martín-Albo, J., & Núñez, J. L. (1997). Motivos, motivación y deporte. Salamanca: Tesitex.
  • Mondoni, M. (1998). Del minibasket al basket: ¿que técnica utilizar? Clinic: revista técnica de baloncesto, 43, 20-24.
  • Mondoni, M. (1999). Progresión metodológica de la enseñanza del minibasket y sus objetivos. Clinic: revista técnica de baloncesto,45, 6-10.
  • Nevil, A. M., Lane, A. M., Kilgour, L. J., Bowes, N., & Whyte, G. P. (2001). Stability of psychometric questionnaires. Journal of Sports Science, 19, 273-278
  • Ortega, E., Olmedilla, A., Méndez, J. J., & Martínez, P. (2006). Preferencias y satisfacción de diferentes acciones técnico-tácticas en jóvenes jugadores de baloncesto. In P. Palau (Ed.), II Simposium Internacional d’ Activitat Física. Palma de Mallorca: Universidad de las Islas Baleares.
  • Padilla, J. L., Gómez, J., Hidalgo, M. D., & Muñiz, J. (2007). Esquema conceptual y procedimientos para analizar la validez de las consecuencias del uso de los test. Psicothema. 19(19): 173-178.
  • Penfield, R. D. & Giacobbi, P. R. (2004) Appying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item content-relevance index. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 8(4), 213-225.
  • Prieto, L., Lamarca, R., & Casado, A. (1998). La evaluación de la fiabilidad en las observaciones clínicas: el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Medicina Clínica, 110, 142-145.
  • Sáenz-López, P., Jiménez, A. C., Giménez, F. J., & Ibáñez, S. J. (2007). La auto percepción de la jugadoras de baloncesto expertas respecto a sus procesos de formación. Cultura Ciencia y Deporte, 7(3), 35-41.
  • Sartori, R., & Pasini, M. (2007). Quality and Quantity in Test Validity: How can we be sured that Psychological Tests Measure what they have to? Quality & Quantity. 41, 359-374.
  • Subramanian, P. R., & Silverman, S. (2000). Validation of scores from an instrument assessing student attitude toward physical education. Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise Science, 4(1), 29-43.
  • Supaporn, S., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). Undergraduate students report their meaning and experiences of having fun in physical education. Physical Educator, 55(2), 57-67.
  • Thomas, J. R., & Nelson, J. K. (2007). Métodos de investigación en actividad física. Barcelona: Paidotribo.
  • Tjeerdesma, B. L., Rink, J. E., & Graham, K. C., (1996). Student perceptions, value, and beliefs prior to, during, and after badminton instruction. Journal of teaching in physical education,1(15), 464-476.
  • Wallhead, T. L., & Buckworth, J. (2004). The role of physical education in the promotion of youth physical activity. Quest,56(3), 285-301.
  • Wieserma, L. D. (2001). Conceptualization and development of the sources of enjoyment in youth sport questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 5(3), 153-157.
  • Zhu, W., Ennis, C. D., & Chen, A. (1998). Many-faceted rasch modelling expert judgment in test development. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2(1), 21-39.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet