¿Por qué no evaluamos la evaluación?Un esbozo para un sistema de evaluación entre iguales
- Rosana Satorre-Cuerda 1
- Patricia Compañ-Rosique 1
- Carlos Villagrá-Arnedo 1
- Francisco Gallego-Durán 1
- Rafael Molina-Carmona 1
- Faraón Llorens-Largo 1
-
1
Universitat d'Alacant
info
- Torres Gil, Manuel (coord.)
- Cañadas Martínez, José Joaquín (coord.)
ISSN: 2531-0607
Año de publicación: 2016
Título del ejemplar: Actas de las XXII Jornadas sobre Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (Almería, 6, 7 y 8 de julio de 2016)
Número: 1
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Actas de las Jornadas sobre la Enseñanza Universitaria de la Informática (JENUI)
Resumen
There are many different ways to assess and different objectives of this assessment. The result of the evaluation process allows the grading of the work quality. Therefore any reflection on the evaluation itself allow for better outcomes, judging the work in the fairest possible way. Peer review is an evaluation strategy increasingly used in the university environment. It has now a central role in the field of teaching, but there is an extensive experience in the field of research. This evaluation method implies an author reviewing, usually anonymously, the work of his or her colleagues who, in turn, can become reviewers of the author’s work. This peer evaluation system enriches the evaluation itself, and it can even become one of the few ways to assess the works in absence of a hierarchical authority on the subject. In this research we consider the process of peer review as a classification process, in which we have several classifiers (reviewers) that, before an input (work to revise) should assign a particular class (work grading). In this analysis a metric is proposed to assess the degree of goodness of the reviewers, in order to help improve the quality of peer review processes providing a more objective assessment of the reviewers task.