Interdependencias entre la heurística y la estrategia de preciosuna aplicación para productos de alimentación de gran consumo

  1. Agustín Cañibano, Clara
  2. Cristófol Rodríguez, Carmen 1
  3. Cerdá Suárez, Luis Manuel 1
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

Revista:
Vivat Academia

ISSN: 1575-2844

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 154

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15178/VA.2021.154.E1340 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Vivat Academia

Resumen

Tradicionalmente, la investigación sobre heurísticas de precios se realiza de forma desvinculada de las estrategias de comunicación en las que se enmarcan los productos y servicios. Este estudio plantea la pregunta de si la heurística de precios funciona de forma similar y es igualmente efectiva para distintas estrategias de comunicación de precios. Concretamente, explora el papel que ejerce la heurística de anclaje de precios en la estrategia value pricing y su impacto en el valor percibido, así como la sensibilidad al precio del producto. Para ello se diseñó un estudio experimental con una muestra de 500 personas, donde el 50% de los participantes fueron expuestos a una condición de anclaje de precio referencial y el 50% restante no fue sometido a esta condición. El estudio se realizó en la categoría de pan de molde con dos productos de pan de la misma marca y línea, con estrategia de precios value pricing y un grupo de control. Los resultados identifican un efecto inverso de la heurística de anclaje en el valor percibido y en la sensibilidad al precio. Este estudio contribuye al desarrollo de la disciplina del neuropricing y la heurística de precios y los resultados tienen implicaciones para los gerentes de comunicación y marketing que desarrollan políticas de precios basados en el valor e interesados en pricing y neuropricing en general.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ariely, D. (2010). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape our Decisions. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Ariely, D. y Norton, M. I. (2007). Psychology and experimental economics: A gap in abstraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 336-339. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8721.2007.00531.x
  • Avlonitis, G. J. y Indounas, K. A. (2005). Pricing objectives and pricing methods in the services sector. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040510579398
  • Brace, I. (2018). Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Brucks, M., Zeithaml, V. A., y Naylor, G. (2000). Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300283005
  • Furnham, A. y Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.008
  • Gedenk, K. y Sattler, H. (1999). The impact of price thresholds on profit contribution – should retailers set 9-ending prices? Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80003-7
  • Green, P. E. y Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1086/208721
  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. y Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (6): 1464–1480.
  • Gumussoy, C. A. y Koseoglu, B. (2016). The effects of service quality, perceived value and price fairness on hotel customers’ satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(9), 523-527. https://doi.org/ 10.18178/joebm.2016.4.9.446
  • Jung M. H., Perfecto H., y Leif D. N. (2016). Anchoring in payment: evaluating a judgmental heuristic in field experimental settings. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1509%2Fjmr.14.0238
  • Kahneman, D. (2013). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Barcelona: Penguin Random House, 33-47.
  • Kantar World Panel. (2018). Panel de Hogares 2017: Informe Consumer Insights cierre 2017 y perspectivas 2018.
  • Karmarkar, U. R., Shiv, B., y Knutson, B. (2015). Cost conscious? The neural and behavioral impact of price primacy on decision making. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1509%2Fjmr.13.0488
  • Kermisch, R. y Burns, D. (2018). Is pricing killing your profits? Bain & Company Report, Bain: Boston.
  • Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., y Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010
  • Konuk, F. A. (2019). The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.005
  • Koschate-Fischer, N. y Wüllner, K. (2017). New developments in behavioral pricing research. Journal of Business Economics, 82(6), 809-875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0839-z
  • Lamb, C. H., Hair, J., y Mc Daniel, C. (2006). Marketing (4a edición). México: Thomson Editores.
  • Lipovetsky, S. (2006). Van Westendorp price sensitivity in statistical modeling. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 12(2), 141.
  • Lipovetsky, S., Magnan, S. y Polzi, A. Z. (2011). Pricing models in marketing research. Intelligent Information Management (3), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.4236/iim.2011.35020
  • Menon, R. V., Sigurdsson, V., Larsen, N. M., Fagerstrøm, A., y Foxall, G. R. (2016). Consumer attention to price in social commerce: Eye tracking patterns in retail clothing. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5008-5013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.072
  • Mussweiler, T., Strack, F. y Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F01461672002611010
  • Nasiry, J. y Popescu, I. (2011). Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Operations Research, 59(6), 1361-1368. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.0952
  • Oppewal, H., Yao, J., Cohen, J. y Bogomolova, S. (2015). An eye-tracking investigation of the price label layout effect on visual attention and choice, in AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 11, eds.: Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 104-104.
  • Paczkowski, W. R. (2018). Pricing analytics: models and advanced quantitative techniques for product pricing. N.Y.: Routledge.
  • Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H. y Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  • Petty, R. y Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–181.
  • Plassmann, H., O'doherty, J., y Rangel, A. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(37), 9984-9988. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007
  • Plassmann, H., Venkatraman, V., Huettel, S., y Yoon, C. (2015). Consumer Neuroscience: Applications, Challenges, and Possible Solutions, Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (August), 427-35. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0048
  • Ramsøy, T. Z., Skov, M., Christensen, M. K., y Stahlhut, C. (2018). Frontal brain asymmetry and willingness to pay. Frontiers in neuroscience, 12, 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00138
  • Rao, V. (2009). Handbook of pricing research in marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts.
  • Santos, R., Oliveira, J., Rocha, J. y Giraldi, J. (2015). Eye tracking in neuromarketing: a research agenda for marketing studies. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 7, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v7n1p32
  • Senior, C., Lee, N. (2008). A manifesto for neuromarketing science. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Special Issue: Neuromarketing 7(4-5), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.250
  • Shaw, S. D. y Bagozzi, R. P. (2018). The neuropsychology of consumer behavior and marketing. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1): 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1006
  • Simon, H. y Fassnacht, M. (2019). Analysis: The Psychology of Price. In: Price Management. Springer, Cham.
  • Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  • Weisstein, F. L., Monroe, K. B. y Kukar-Kinney, M. (2013). Effects of price framing on consumers' perceptions of online Dynamic pricing practices. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0330-0
  • Westendorp, P. H. (1976) , NSS Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM)—A New Approach to study Consumer-Perception of Prices, Proceedings of the 29th ESOMAR Congress, Venice, 5-9 September 1976, 139-167.
  • Wolfe, J. M. y Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet