Coyuntura y estructura social en las percepciones sobre la situación social y económica de España

  1. Antonio Alaminos 1
  2. José Félix Tezanos 2
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Zeitschrift:
Sistema: revista de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 0210-0223

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Nummer: 262

Seiten: 3-21

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Andere Publikationen in: Sistema: revista de ciencias sociales

Zusammenfassung

This research analyses the perceptions of the population about the personal, social and economic situation as they are usually studied in the CIS monthly barometers, considered as interrelated opinions. The first level of analysis concerns the presence of a structural bias in the measurement of certain problems that comes from the way in which questions on this issue are posed. This bias occurs due to the existence of differentiated response patterns according to self-perceptions of social class (subjective social class), and according to educational level and ideological positions (expressed in spatial terms in the location on a left-right scale). The second level considers how this structure introduces response patterns in the assessment of personal and societal situations, which interfere with the subjective perceptions of changes that may occur because of the existing socioeconomic climate at a given time.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Debbie Collins, «Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive rnethods», Quality of Lije Research, 12, 2003, págs. 229-238.
  • Thomas Jabine, Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines, Washington DC, National Academy Press, 1984.
  • Kristen Miller, Stephanie Willson, Valerie Chepp. y José Luis Padilla (eds.), Cognitive interviewing methodology, New Jersey, Willey, 2014.
  • Stanley Presser, et al., Methods Jor testing and evaluation survey questions, Nueva Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  • Roger Tourangeau, Lance Rips y Kenneth Rasinski The psychology of survey response, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • Fritz Strack y Leonard Martin «Thinking, judging, and cornmunicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys», In Hans Hippler, Norbert Schwarz y Seymour Sudman (eds.), Social information processing and survey methodology, Nueva York, Springer Verlag, 1987, págs. 123-148.
  • Roger Tourangeau «Cognitive science and survey rnethods: A cognitive perspective», en Thomas Jabine, Miron Straf, Judith Tanur y Roger Tourangeau (eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bndge between disciplines, Washington DC, National Academy Press, 1984, págs. 73-100.
  • Yfke Ongena y Wil Dijkstra «A model of cognitive processes and conversational principles in survey interview interaction», Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, DOI:10.1002/acp.1334, 2007, págs. 145-163.
  • Eliot Smíth y Federica Conrey «Mental representations are states not things: Implications for irnplicit and explicit measurement», en B. Wittenbrink y N. Schwarz (eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Progress and controversies, Nueva York, Guilford, 2007, págs. 247-264.
  • Floyd Fowler y Thomas Mangione, Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing InterviewerRelated Error, Applied Social Research Methods Series: 18, Newbury Park, Sage, 1990.
  • Alaminas A., Teoría y práctica de la encuesta, Madrid, CEDEAL, 1991.
  • Herbert Weisberg, The Total Survey Error Approach: a Guide to the New Science of Survey Research, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2005.
  • Gordon Willis, Cognitive interviewing: a too! Jor improving questionnaire design, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 2005.
  • Robert Graves, et al., Survey Nonresponse. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2001.
  • Robert Graves Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1986.
  • Oppenheim, A.N. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. New York, Basic Books, 1966.
  • Debbie Collins, «Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods», Quality of Life Research, 12, 2003, págs. 229-238.
  • José Félix Tezanos, La sociedad dividida. Estructuras de clases y desigualdades en las sociedades tecnológicas, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva, 2013.
  • Donald Treiman, Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective, Academic Press, Nueva York. International Occupational Prestíge Scale (SIOPS), 1977.
  • John Goldthorpe, Clive Payne y Carriona Llewellyn, «Trends in class mobility,» Sociology 12, 1978, págs. 441-468.
  • John Goldthorpe, Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modem Britain, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980.
  • Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe y Lucienne Portocarero, «Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden», British ]ournal of Sociology 30, 41, 1979, págs. 5-451.
  • Marie Haug, «Measurement in social stratification,» Annual Review of Sociology 3, 1977, págs. 51-77.
  • Robert Hodge, «The measurement of occupational status,» Social Science Research 10, 1981, págs. 396-415.
  • Robert Hodge y Paul Siegel, «The measurement of social class», en International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (Debora Sills, ed.), Vol. 15, Macmillan, Nueva York, 1968, págs. 316-324.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet