A comparison between different tests for functional threshold power determination in running

  1. Olaya Cuartero, Javier 1
  2. Sellés Pérez, Sergio 1
  3. Ferriz Valero, Alberto 1
  4. Cejuela Anta, Roberto 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Revista:
JPEHM: Journal of Physical Education and Human Movement

ISSN: 2659-5699

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 1

Número: 2

Páginas: 4-15

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/JPEHMJPEHM.V1I2.5679 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: JPEHM: Journal of Physical Education and Human Movement

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Introduction:Power is an important variable to evaluate performance. With the increasing of devices for the power measurement, it is simple to associate certain watts to the running Functional Threshold Power measured in watts (rFTPw) as indicates Vance (2016). Affirming that the estimation of the power through accelerometry, can revolutionize the training of running.The main goal of this study was to find the most appropriate test for the determination of rFTPw. Material and methods:9 recreational triathletes participated in the study (22.9 + 4.8 years). All the tests were carried out with a minimum of 24 hours of rest between each test carried out in an athletics track measuring the running power data with Stryd Summit footpod (Stryd, Boulder, CO, USA). Results:The T 3 min -9 min was the one that presented a lower average error with respect to the rFTPw M for power and pace. Conclusions:T 3 min – 9 min could be the best alternative without taking into account the distance or duration of competition. Because that rFTPw changes depending of the duration of each test. It would not be valid to use the watts associated to Critical Speed (CS) obtained in the test T 3 MT. Being that it supposes a greater average error regarding the rFTPw M in power and pace. The T 30 min could be an alternative when calculating the rFTPw with the data obtained in a training or competition of the same duration. The tests with the lowest average error in the external variable power are the ones with the lowest error in pace. Although the pace would remain the main variable to control the external load in running.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allen, H., & Coggan, A. (2006). Training and Racing with a PowerMeter. Boulder, CO: VeloPress.
  • Aubry, R. L., Power, G. A., & Burr, J. F. (2018). An assessment of running power as a training metric for elite and recreational runners. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 32(8), 2258-2264.
  • Austin, C., Hokanson, J., McGinnis, P., & Patrick, S. (2018). The Relationship between Running Power and Running Economy in Well-Trained Distance Runners. Sports, 6(4), 142.
  • Bourdon, P. C., Cardinale, M., Murray, A., Gastin, P., Kellmann, M., Varley, M. C., ... & Cable, N. T. (2017). Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 12(Suppl 2), S2-161.
  • Esteve-Lanao, J., & Cejuela, R. (2011). Evaluación de la resistencia en deportes cíclicos. En Naclerio, F. J. (2011). Entrenamiento deportivo: fundamentos y aplicaciones en diferentes deportes (pp 202-203). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Médica Panamiericana.
  • Faulkner J. (1968). Physiology of swimming and diving. En H. Falis (ed.), Exercise physiology. Baltimore: Academic Press.
  • García-Pinillos, F., Roche-Seruendo, L. E., Marcén-Cinca, N., Marco-Contreras, L. A., & Latorre-Román, P. A. (2018). Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Stryd System for the Assessment of Running Stride Kinematics at Different Velocities. Journal of strength and conditioning research.
  • Johnson, M. A., Sharpe, G. R., & Brown, P. I. (2007). Inspiratory muscle training improves cycling time-trial performance and anaerobic work capacity but not critical power. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 101(6), 761-770.
  • Lee, R. C., Wang, Z., Heo, M., Ross, R., Janssen, I., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2000). Total-body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction models. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72(3), 796-803.
  • Elvira, J. L. (1998). Development of a new software for the calculation of the mechanical power in the jump with force platform. Study of the reproducibility of the values obtained in various jumping tests (Doctoral dissertation, Master thesis, INEF of Castilla y León).
  • Marroyo, J. A. R., & López, J. G. (2015). Trabajo, potencia y energía. In Biomecánica básica aplicada a la actividad física y el deporte (pp. 149-172). Paidotribo.
  • Pettitt, R. W., Jamnick, N., & Clark, I. E. (2012). 3-min all-out exercise test for running. International journal of sports medicine, 33(06), 426-431.
  • Puleo, N. A., & Abraham, K. A. (2018). External Feedback Does Not Affect Running Pace in Recreational Runners. International Journal of Exercise Science, 11(5), 384.
  • Ross, W. D., & Marfell-Jones, M. J. (1991). Kinanthropometry. Physiological testing of elite athlete. Human Kinetics Books. Champaign Il.
  • Thomas, S., Reading, J., & Shephard, R. J. (1992). Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Canadian journal of sport sciences.
  • Van Dijk, H., & Van Megen, R. (2017). The Secret of Running: Maximum Performance Gains Through Effective Power Metering and Training Analysis. Meyer & Meyer Sport.
  • Vance, J. (2016). Run with power: The complete guide to power meters for running.
  • Withers, R. T., Craig, N. P., Bourdon, P. C., & Norton, K. I. (1987). Relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of male athletes. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 56(2), 191-200.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet