Measurement invariance of the sensitive assessment for gender equality (SAGE) index across degreeFindings from two teacher education programmes in Spain

  1. Cristina Miralles-Cardona 1
  2. Esther Chiner 1
  3. María Cristina Cardona-Moltó 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Revista:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Alternative paths in educational technology research: Innovative concepts and methods

Volumen: 10

Número: 1

Páginas: 157-174

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2021.1.611 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Otras publicaciones en: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Western European countries have made impressive gender equality (GE) progress in education during the last few decades. Unfortunately, the implementation of gender mainstreaming (GM) in higher education has not been satisfactory. This paper describes a survey-based research study designed to explore student teachers’ perceptions of training for GE in teacher education (TE) using the Sensitive Assessment for Gender Equality (SAGE) index. The study firstly aims to analyse the factor invariance across degree of the SAGE and secondly tries to describe the status of GM implementation in teacher education programmes from students’ perspectives. Data were collected from 398 student teachers (84% female) aged 21.44, enrolled on two TE programmes from a public higher education institution in the Autonomous Region of Valencia (Spain). Using single and multi-group CFA the study revealed that the proposed three-factor structure of the SAGE fitted well to early childhood and elementary school student teachers’ data, thus suggesting equivalence between its components in both samples. Early childhood students scored significantly higher than elementary school student teachers in their reported perceptions of gender equality training and awareness of gender inequalities. Results will be displayed in terms of identifying institutional and curricular needs for GE education practices as findings reveal a clear demand for change

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arafat, S. M., Chowdhury, H., Qusar, M. M. A., & Hafez, M. A. (2016). Cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of research instruments: A methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Health, 5(3), 129–129. https://doi.org/10.5455/jbh.20160615121755
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). AMOS 23 user’s guide. Retrieved from ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/ analytics/spss/documentation/amos/23.0/en/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Amos_User_Guide.pdf
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500101
  • Council of Europe. (2011). European Pact for Gender Equality 2011-2020. Retrieved from htps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52011XG0525%2801%29
  • Council of Europe. (2018). Council of Europe gender equality strategy 2018-2023. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/strategy-en-2018-2023/16807b58eb
  • DeJaeghere, J. (2015). Reframing gender and education for the post-2015 Agenda: A critical capability approach. In S. McGrath & Q. Gu (Eds.), Handbook of international education and development (pp. 63–77). Taylor and Francis.
  • European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2012-2013). Gender equality training in the European Union: Mapping, research and stakeholders’ engagement. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/news/gender-training-european-union-mapping-research-and -stakeholders-engagement-2012-2013
  • European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2014). Peer-to-peer exchange seminar: How do we make gender mainstreaming work? Retrieved from https://oqconsulting.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Final_Report_Peer_to_Peer_Seminar_Nov_20.pdf
  • European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2016). Gender equality training: Gender mainstreaming toolkit. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equality-training-gender-mainstreaming-toolkit
  • European Parliament. (2003). Summary of the Treaty of Nice. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_03_23
  • European Parliament. (2009). TheTreaty of Lisbon. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_1.1.5.pdf
  • Fontaine, J. R. J. (2005). Equivalence. InK.Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of socialmeasurement (pp. 803–813). Academic Press.
  • García-Ramos, F. J., Zurian-Hernández, F. A., & Núñez-Gómez, P. (2020). Los estudios de género en los grados de comunicación. Comunicar, 63, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3916/C63-2020-02
  • González-Pérez, T. (2017). Políticas educativas igualitarias en España: la igualdad de género en los estudios de magisterio. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 26(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.2764
  • Guarinos, V., Caro, F. J., & Cobo-Durán, S. (2018). La igualdad de género en los estudios de grado en Comunicación: la transversalidad imaginaria. Revista Prisma Social, 22, 296–325. Retrieved from https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/2571
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332273
  • Kitta, I., & Cardona-Moltó, M. C. (2020). Adaptación y validación de la versión griega del índice EFIG (Evaluación de la Formación para la Igualdad de Género) en estudiantes universitarios. In R. Roig Vila (Ed.), Nuevas aportaciones desde la investigación e innovación educativas (pp. 259–268). Octaedro.
  • Larrondo, A., & Rivero, D. (2019). A case study on the incorporation of gender-awareness into the university journalism curriculum in Spain. Gender and Education, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1270420
  • Lombardo, E., & Mergaert, L. (2013). Gender mainstreaming and resistance to gender training: A framework for studying implementation. NORA Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(4), 296–311. http://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2013.851115
  • Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
  • Miralles-Cardona, C. (2019). Evidencias de fiabilidad y validez del índice de Evaluación Sensible a la Formación en Igualdad de Género [Reliability and validity evidence of the Sensitive Assessment for Gender Equality index]. In R. Roig-Vila (Ed.), Investigación e innovación en la enseñanza superior: nuevos contextos, nuevas ideas (pp. 320–331). Octaedro.
  • Miralles-Cardona, C. (2020). Examining preservice teachers’ education for gender equality using a gender sensitive scale: A case from Spain. In E. J. Byker & A. Horton (Eds.), Elementary education: Global perspective, challenges and issues of the 21st century (pp. 99–126). Nova Science Publishers.
  • Miralles-Cardona, C., Cardona-Moltó, M. C., & Chiner, C. (2020). La perspectiva de género en la formación inicial de docentes: estudio descriptivo de las percepciones del alumnado [Student perceptions of gender mainstreaming in initial teacher education: A descriptive study]. Educación XX1, 23(2), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.23899
  • Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 171–189. https://oi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x
  • Ortega-Sánchez, D., & Pagès-Blanch, J. (2018). Género y formación del profesorado: análisis de las guías docentes del área de Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales. Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación, 21(21), 53–53. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3315
  • Pastor, I., & Acosta, A. (2016). La institucionalización de las políticas de igualdad de género en la universidad española. Avances y retos. Investigaciones Feministas, 7, 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.52966
  • Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-service student-teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6
  • Rands, K. E. (2009). Considering Transgender People in Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109341475
  • Serra, P., Soler, S., Prat, M., Vizcarra, M. T., Garay, B., & Flintoff, A. (2018). The (in)visibility of gender knowledge in the Physical Activity and Sport Science degree in Spain. Sport, Education and Society, 23(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1199016
  • Spanish Government. (2004, December 29). Ley Orgánica 1/2004, de 28 de diciembre, de Medidas de Protección Integral contra la Violencia de Género [Organic Law 1/2004, of December 28, on Comprehensive Protection Measure against Gender Violence]. State Official Gazette/Boletin Oficial del Estado, 133, 1-44.
  • Spanish Government. (2007, March 23). Ley Orgánica 3/2007, de 22 de marzo, para la Igualdad Efectiva de Hombres y Mujeres [Organic Law 1/2004, of December 28, for the Effective Equality of Men and Women]. State Official Gazette/Boletin Oficial del Estado, 71, 1-66.
  • Thorndike, R. M. (1997). Measurement evaluation in psychology and education. Prentice-Hall.
  • UNWomen Training Centre. (2015). Training for gender equality: Twenty years on. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/LucyFerguson3/papertrainingforgenderequality20b-62417254
  • UNESCO. (2015). A guide for gender equality in teacher education: Policy and practices. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002316/231646e.pdf
  • UnitedNations. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CEDAW.aspx
  • United Nations. (1995). Beijing Platform for Action. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/pdfs/Beijing_Declaration_and_Platform_for_Action.pdf
  • United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
  • University of Alicante. (2018). The UA in figures 2017. Retrieved from https://utc.ua.es/es/documentos/ua-en-cifras/libros-ua-en-cifras/libro-ua-en-cifras-2017-para-imprimir.pdf
  • Unterhalter, E., Heslop, J., & Mamedu, A. (2013). Girls claiming education rights: Reflections on distribution, empowerment and gender justice in Northern Tanzania and Northern Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(6), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.05.007
  • Valdivieso, S., Ayuste, A., Rodríguez-Menéndez, M. C., & Vila-Merino, E. (2016). Educación y género en la formación docente en un enfoque de equidad y democracia. In C. I. and Flores et al. (Eds.), Democracia y educación en la formación docente (pp. 117–140). Universidad de Vic-Universidad Central de Cataluña.
  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
  • Verge, T., Ferrer-Fons, M., & González, M. J. (2018). Resistance to mainstreaming gender into the higher education curriculum. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816688237
  • Vizcarra, M. T., Nuño, T., Lasarte, G., Aristizabal, M. P., & Uria, A. A. (2015). La perspectiva de género en los títulos de Grado en la Escuela Universitaria de Magisterio de VitoriaGasteiz. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 13, 297–297. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2015.6448
  • Weiner, G. (2000). A critical review of gender and teacher education in Europe. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 8(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360000200091
  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.11770891243287001002002
  • WHO (World Health Organization). (2000). Millennium development goals. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/about/en/
  • World University Rankings. (2020). Impact rankings 2020: gender equality. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/impact/2020/gender-equality#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/undefined
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet