Construcción del concepto múltiplo común en el dominio de los números naturales

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bodí, S. (2006). Análisis de la comprensión de divisibilidad en el conjunto de los números naturales. Tesis doctoral. Departamento de Innovación y Formación Didáctica. Universidad de Alicante <http://hdl.handle.net/10045/7757>.
• Bodí, S., Valls, J. y Llinares, S. (2005). El análisis del desarrollo del esquema de divisibilidad en N. La construcción de un instrumento. NÚMEROS, 60, pp. 3-24.
• Bodí, S., Valls, J. y Llinares, S. (2007). La comprensión de la divisibilidad en N: un análisis implicativo. En Gras, R. et al. (eds.). Nouveaux Apports Théoriques à l'Analyse Statistique Implicative et Applications: 4èmes Rencontres Internationales d'Analyse Statistique Implicative, pp. 99-110. Castellón: España <http://hdl.handle.net/10045/8015>.
• Brown, A. (2002). Patterns of thought and prime factorization. En Campbell, S. y Zazkis, R. (eds.). Learning and Teaching Number Theory, pp. 131-137. Westport: Ablex Publishing.
• Brown, A., Thomas, K. y Tolias, G. (2002). Conceptions of divisibility: Success and understanding. En S. Campbell y R. Zazkis (eds.). Learning and Teaching Number Theory, pp. 83-95. Westport: Ablex Publishing.
• Campbell, S.R. y Zazkis, R. (Eds.) (2002). Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction. Westport, Conn.: Ablex Pub.
• Cañadas, M.C., Deulofeu, J., Figueiras, L., Reid, D.A. y Yevdokimov, O. (2008). Perspectivas teóricas en el proceso de elaboración de conjeturas e implicaciones para la práctica: tipos y pasos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 26(3), pp. 431-444.
• Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability, en Kelly, A.E. y Lesh, R.A. (eds.). Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, pp. 547-590. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pbs.
• Dörfler, W. (2002). Formation of mathematical objects as decision making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(4), pp. 337-350.
• Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking, en Tall, D. (ed.). Advanced Mathematical Thinking, pp. 95-123. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Empson, B., Junk, D., Domínguez, H. y Turner, E. (2005). Fractions and the coordination of multiplicatively related quantities: A cross-sectional study of children's thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, pp. 1-28. (Pubitemid 44451029)
• Empson, S.B. y Turner, E (2006). The emergence of multiplicative thinking in children's solution to paper folding tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, pp. 46-56. (Pubitemid 43192701)
• Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.
• Greer, B. (1994). Extending the meaning of multiplication and division, en Harel, G. y Confrey, J. (eds.). The Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics, pp. 61-85. Albany: NY: SUNNY Press.
• Harel, G. y Confrey, J. (Eds.) (1994). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics. Albany, NY: SUNNY Press.
• Hazzan, O. y Zazkis, R. (2005). Reducing abstraction: the case of school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), pp. 101-119. (Pubitemid 40549984)
• Llinares, S. y Roig, A.I. (2008). Secondary School students' construction and use of mathematical models in solving word problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, pp. 505-532.
• Monaghan, J. y Ozmantar, F. (2006). Abstraction and consolidation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), pp. 233-258. (Pubitemid 44272965)
• Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. Sussex: Psychology Press (Editado en 1977 por Presses Universitaires de France).
• Ramful, A. y Olive, J. (2008). Reversibility of thought: An instance in multiplicative tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27, pp. 138-151.
• Roig, A.I. (2008). Análisis de las fases del proceso de abstracción matemática en estudiantes de secundaria. Tesis doctoral inédita. Departamento de Innovación y Formación Didáctica. Universidad de Alicante.
• Sierra, M., González, M.T., García, A. y González, M. (1989). Divisibilidad. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Simon, M. A., Tzur, R., Heinz, K. y Kinzel, M. (2004). Explicating a mechanism for conceptual learning: Elaborating the construct of reflective abstraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), pp. 305-329. (Pubitemid 39508252)
• Sriraman, B. (2004). Reflective abstraction, uniframes and the formulations of generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, pp. 205-222. (Pubitemid 38750334)
• Steffe, L. (1994). Children's multiplying schemes. En Harel, G. y Confrey, J. (eds.). The Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics, pp. 3-40. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• Tzur, R. (2003). Teacher and students' joint production of a reversible fraction conception. En Pateman, N., Dougherty, B. y Zilliox, J. (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Conference for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, pp. 315-322. Honolulu: PME.
• Tzur, R. (2004). Teacher and students' joint production of a reversible fraction conception. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(1), pp. 93-114. (Pubitemid 38184325)
• Tzur, R. (2007). Fine grain assessment of students' mathematical understanding: participatory and anticipatory stages in learning a new mathematical concept. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, pp. 273-291.
• Tzur, R. y Simon, M.A. (2004). Distinguishing two stages of mathematics conceptual learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, pp. 287-304. (Pubitemid 40631084)
• Vergnaud, G. (1996). The theory of conceptual fields. En L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P., Cobb, G.A. Goldin y B. Greer (eds.). Theories of Mathematical Learning, pp. 219-239. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Verschaffel, L., Greer, B. y Torbeyns, J. (2006). Numerical thinking, en Gutiérrez, A. y Boero, P. (eds.). Handbook of Research on the Psychology of mathematics Education, pp. 51-82. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
• Zazkis, R. (1998). Divisors and quotients: Acknowledging polysemy. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(3), pp. 27-30.
• Zazkis, R. (2000). Factors, divisors and multiples: Exploring the web of students' connections. En Schoenfeld, A., Kaput, J. y Dubinsky, E. (eds.). Vol. 4. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, pp. 210-238. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
• Zazkis, R. (2008). Divisibility and transparency of number representations. En Carlson, M.P. y Rasmussen, C. (eds.). Making the Connection: Research and Practice in Undergraduate Mathematics, pp. 81-92. MAA notes.
• Zazkis, R. y Campbell, S. (1996). Divisibility and multiplicative structure of natural numbers: preservice teachers' understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), pp. 540-563.
• Zazkis, R. y Campbell, S.R. (Eds.) (2006). Number Theory in Mathematics Education: Perspectives and Prospects. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
• Zazkis, R. y Gadowsky, K. (2001). Attending to transparent features of opaque representations of natural numbers. En Couco, A. (ed.). NCTM 2001 Yearbook: The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics, pp. 41-52. Reston, VA: NCTM.
• Zazkis, R. y Liljedahl, P. (2004). Understanding primes: The role of representation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(3), pp. 164-186. (Pubitemid 38640704)