Evaluación de los patrones de movimiento fundamentales en niñoscomparación de género en escolares de Educación Primaria

  1. García-Jaén, Miguel 1
  2. Sellés-Pérez, Sergio 1
  3. Cortell-Tormo, Juan Manuel 1
  4. Férriz-Valero, Alberto 1
  5. Cejuela, Roberto 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Journal:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726,  1988-2041

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 34

Pages: 282-286

Type: Article

DOI: 10.47197/RETOS.V0I34.65097 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85060039455 WoS: WOS:000452968000052 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fundamental movement patterns in eight and nine-year-old children, using the Functional Movement ScreenTM test (FMS) and analyzing gender differences in FMS scores among Primary Education students. 40 children, 20 girls and 20 boys, participated in this study. The performance of each participant on the FMS was digitally recorded during the Physical Education classes at school. After that, collected data were analyzed by two expert evaluators in FMS. Finally, a statistical data analysis was developed. The obtained results showed that females had higher total composite scores in the seven FMS test compared with males (15.3 ± 1.999 vs. 13.75 ± 1.970; p = .017). Particularly, females scored significantly better than males in the deep squat test (2.3 ± .657 vs. 2.75 ± .444; p = .015) and in the in-line lunge test (1.8 ± .834 vs. 2.75 ± .444; p = .000). In conclusion, females obtained higher total composite score than the males in the FMS test, scoring significantly better than males in deep squat test and in the in-line lunge test. In addition, the majority of the females scored above 14 points, while most of the males scored 14 or less points on the FMS total composite score, which could be an indicative of less motor skills and also an increased risk of injury in males.

Bibliographic References

  • Anderson, B. E., Neumann, M. L., & Huxel Bliven, K. C. (2015). Functional movement screen differences between male and female secondary school athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(4), 1098–1106.
  • Bonazza, N. A., Smuin, D., Onks, C. A., Silvis, M. L., & Dhawan, A. (2017). Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(3), 725-732.
  • Chorba, R. S., Chorba, D. J., Bouillon, L. E., Overmyer, C. A., & Landis, J. A. (2010). Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT, 5(2), 47.
  • Cook, G. (2010). Movement: functional movement systems; screening, assessment and corrective strategies. On Target Publications.
  • Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006a). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT, 1(2), 62.
  • Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006b). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy: NAJSPT, 1(3), 132–9.
  • Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B. J., & Voight, M. (2014a). Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 1. International journal of sports physical therapy, 9(3), 396.
  • Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B. J., & Voight, M. (2014b). Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 2. International journal of sports physical therapy, 9(4), 549.
  • García Cantó, E. (2010). Niveles de actividad física habitual en escolares de 10 a 12 años de la Región de Murcia. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Murcia.
  • Gómez, J., Berral, C., Viana, B., & Berral, F (2002). Valoración de la aptitud física en escolares. Archivos de medicina del deporte, XIX, 273-282.
  • Gutiérrez, M. (2000). Actividad física, estilos de vida y calidad de vida. Revista de Educación Física, 77, 5-14.
  • Kerr, R., Côté, J., Hay, J. & Côté-Laurence, P. (1998). Changing attitudes and expectation in a university setting: a case study. Physical educator, 55 (3), 160-168.
  • Kiesel, K., Plisky, P. & Butler R. (2011). Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off-season intervention program in professional football players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 21:287-292.
  • Martínez Castañeda, R. (2011). Valoración de la condición física en relación con la salud en escolares preadolescentes de la provincia de León: influencia de la actividad física en el sobrepeso, obesidad y riesgo de síndrome metabólico. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de León.
  • Moran, R. W., Schneiders, A. G., Mason, J., & Sullivan, S. J. (2017). Do Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite scores predict subsequent injury? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(23), 1661-1669.
  • Newton, F., McCall, A., Ryan, D., Blackburne, C., aus der Fünten, K., Meyer, T., ... & McCunn, R. (2017). Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) score does not predict injury in English Premier League youth academy football players. Science and Medicine in Football, 1(2), 102-106.
  • Paszkewicz, J. R., McCarty, C. W., & Van Lunen, B. L. (2013). Comparison of functional and static evaluation tools among adolescent athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(10), 2842-2850.
  • Puerto, J. R. G., de la Rosa, C. J. B., Montaner, B. H. V., & de la Rosa, F. J. B. (2002). Valoración de la aptitud física en escolares. Archivos de medicina del deporte: revista de la Federación Española de Medicina del Deporte y de la Confederación Iberoamericana de Medicina del Deporte, (90), 273-282.
  • Ruiz Pérez, L. M. (1994a). Desarrollo Motor y Actividades Físicas (3a ed.). Madrid: Gymnos.
  • Ruiz Pérez, L. M. (1994b). Deporte y Aprendizaje: Procesos de adquisición y desarrollo de habilidades. Madrid: Visor.
  • Ruiz Pérez, L. M. (2000). Aprender a ser incompetente en educación física: un enfoque psicosocial. Apunts. Educación física y Deportiva, 60, 20- 25.
  • Ruiz-Pérez, L. M., Navia Manzano, J. A., Ruiz Amengual, A., Ramón Otero, I., & Palomo Nieto, M. (2016). Coordinación motriz y rendimiento académico en adolescentes. RETOS. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, (29).
  • Sánchez Bañuelos, F. (1996). La actividad física orientada hacia la salud. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
  • Schneiders, A. G., Davidsson, Å., Hörman, E., & Sullivan, S. J. (2011). Functional movement screenTM normative values in a young, active population. International journal of sports physical therapy, 6(2), 75.
  • Telford, A. (1998). Physical education teacher ́s ayadic interaction with high and low motor skilled student in secondary school. Microform Publication. Oregon: Universidad de Oregon.
  • White, S. A. (1995). The perceived purposes of sport among male and female intercollegiate and recreational sport participants. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 490-502.
Data source: Dialnet