Preguntas y respuestas sobre la gestación por sustituciónlos estudios de opinión pública a revisión

  1. Rodríguez Jaume, María-José 1
  2. González Río, María-José 1
  3. Jareño Ruiz, Diana 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Aldizkaria:
Política y sociedad

ISSN: 1130-8001,  1988-3129

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Zenbakien izenburua: Tensión y relación: contextos y comprensiones del parentesco en las familias creadas mediante la reproducción humana asistida

Alea: 56

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 295-316

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.5209/POSO.59736 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85078796059 WoS: WOS:000492697500002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Política y sociedad

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Surrogate pregnancy is a reproductive practice that raises enormous social, bioethical, political and media controversy because it undermines the canonical pillars that sustain the family institution. In this article we present the bibliographic or Scoping Review of a 29 scientific articles that collect opinion surveys on this subject. They show surrogate pregnancy as a phenomenon still mostly frown upon by society although, from a chronological perspective, a trend towards wider acceptance can also be observed. Population generally prefers assisted reproduction techniques because they guarantee continuation of the own genetic heritage and do not entail the participation of third parties. In the social system of preferences, subrogation is relegated to the last place. A small number of works have tried to identify and analyse the factors determining the degree of acceptance of surrogate pregnancy. Controversial issues, such as commercial or “closed” subrogation, are not frequently included into public opinion surveys. When inquiring about the social representation of surrogate pregnant women, the approach adopted by most of the surveys reproduces the image created and broadcasted by mainstream media, ignoring the findings presented by both ethnography and research specifically aimed at assessing the results of subrogation agreements. Most opinion studies frame the public’s views within a medical approach. Studies that inquiry about the degree of acceptance of subrogation for “social” reasons are exceptional, despite the fact that the development of assisted reproduction techniques takes place in parallel with the emergence of new family forms.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

El estudio que se presenta se enmarca en el proyecto I+D+i Un nuevo escenario para la infancia: actitudes, motivaciones y disponibilidad de la población española hacia la adopción y el acogimiento , financiado por el Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Programa Estatal de I+D+i 2013-2016 orientada a los Retos de la Sociedad).

Finantzatzaile

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • van den Akker, O. B. A. (2006): "A review of family donor constructs: Current research and future directions", Human Reproduction Update, 12(2), pp. 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi038
  • van den Akker, O. B. A. (2007): "Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood", Human Reproduction Update, 13(1), pp. 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml039
  • van den Akker, O. B. A., I. Camara y B. Hunt (2016): 'Together … for only a moment': British newspaper constructions of altruistic non-commercial surrogate motherhood", Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34(3), pp. 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2016.1141398
  • Arksey, H. y L. O'Malley (2007): "Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework", International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), pp. 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Baykal, B., C. Korkmaz, S. T. Ceyhan, U. Goktolga y I. Baser (2008): "Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy", Fertility and Sterility, 89(4), pp. 817-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.022
  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1989): "From the pill to test-tube babies: new options, new pressures in reproductive behavior", en VVAA, eds., Healing technology. Feminist perspectives. The University of Michigan Press, pp. 23-40.
  • Bello, F. A., O. R. Akinajo y O. Olayemi (2014): "In-vitro fertilization, gamete donation and surrogacy: perceptions of women attending an infertility clinic in Ibadan, Nigeria", African Journal of Reproductive Health, 18(2), pp. 127-133.
  • Berger, P. y T. Luckmann (1968): La construcción social de la realidad, Buenos Aires, Amorrortu.
  • Bruce-Hickman, K., L. Kirkland y T. Ba-Obeid (2009): "The attitudes and knowledge of medical students towards surrogacy", Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 29(3), pp. 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610802712926
  • Chliaoutakis, J. E. (2002): "A relationship between traditionally motivated patterns and gamete donation and surrogacy in urban areas of Greece", Human Reproduction, 17(8), pp. 2187-2191. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.8.2187
  • Chliaoutakis, J. E., S. Koukouli y M. Papadakaki (2002): "Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public's intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy", Human Reproduction, 17(11), pp. 2995-3002. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.11.2995
  • Ciccarelli, J. C. y L. J. Beckman (2005): "Navigating rough waters: an overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy", Journal of Social Issues, 61(1), pp. 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00392.x
  • Constantinidis, D. y R. Cook (2012): "Australian perspectives on surrogacy: the influence of cognitions, psychological and demographic characteristics", Human Reproduction, 27(4), pp. 1080-1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der470
  • Daniluk, J. C. y E. Koert (2012): "Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction", Human Reproduction, 27(8), pp. 2405-2412. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des190
  • Dunn, P. C., I. J. Ryan y K. O'Brien (1988): "College students' acceptance of adoption and five alternative fertilization techniques", The Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), pp. 282-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551425
  • Edelmann, R. J. (2004): "Surrogacy: the psychological issues", Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22(2), pp. 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264683042000205981
  • Everingham, S. G., M. A. Stafford-Bell y K. Hammarberg (2014): "Australians' use of surrogacy", The Medical Journal of Australia, 201(5), pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.11311
  • Genuis, S. J., W. C. Chang y S. K. Genuis (1993): "Public attitudes in Edmonton toward assisted reproductive technology", Canadian Medical Association Journal, 149(2), pp. 153-161.
  • Goffman, E. (1974): Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  • Halman, L. J., A. Abbey y F. M. Andrews (1992): "Attitudes about infertility interventions among fertile and infertile couples", American Journal of Public Health, 82, pp. 191-194. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.82.2.191
  • IFFS (2016): Global reproductive health. IFFS Surveillance 2016. (7ª ed.). International Federation of Fertility Societies.
  • Jadva, V., C. Murray, E. Lycett, F. MacCallum y S. Golombok (2003): "Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers", Human Reproduction, 18(10), pp. 2196-2204. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg397
  • Jadva, V., S. Imrie y S. Golombok (2015): "Surrogate mothers 10 years on: a longitudinal study of psychological well-being and relationships with the parents and child", Human Reproduction, 30(2), pp. 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu339
  • Kilic, S., M. Ucar, H. Yaren, M. Gulec, A. Atac, F. Demirel, C. Karabulut y O. Demirel (2009): "Determination of the attitudes of Turkish infertile women towards surrogacy and oocyte donation", Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(1), pp. 36-40.
  • Kovacs, G. T., C. Wood, G. Morgan y M. Brumby (1985): "The attitudes of the Australian community to treatment of infertility by in vitro fertilization and associated procedures", Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 2(4), pp. 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201799
  • Kovacs, G. T., G. Morgan, C. Wood, C. Forbes y D. Howlett (2003): "Community attitudes to assisted reproductive technology: a 20-year trend", Medicine and the Community, 179(17), pp. 536-538.
  • Krishnan, V. (1994): "Attitudes toward surrogate motherhood in Canada", Health Care for Women International, 15(4), pp. 333-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339409516126
  • Lasker, J. N. y D. E. Murray (2001): "Attitudes toward technologies for conception: a 15-year follow-up", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(10), pp. 2165-2183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00169.x
  • Lindheim, S. R., K. Coyne, L. Ayensu-Coker, K. O'Leary, S. Sinn y A. S. Jaeger (2014): "The impact of assisted reproduction on socio-cultural values and social norms", 4(4), pp. 227-242. https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2014.44025
  • Markens, S. (2012): "The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy", Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), pp. 1745-1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.013
  • McCombs, M. (2006): Estableciendo la agenda, Barcelona, Paidós.
  • Miall, C. E. (1989): "Reproductive technology vs. the stigma of involuntary childlessness", Social Casework, 70(1), 43-50.
  • Minai, J., K. Suzuki, Y. Takeda, K. Hoshi y Z. Yamagata (2007): "There are gender differences in attitudes toward surrogacy when information on this technique is provided", European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 132(2), pp. 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.016
  • Pande, A. (2010): "At Least I Am Not Sleeping with Anyone": Resisting the Stigma of Commercial Surrogacy in India", Feminist Studies, 36(2), pp. 292-312.
  • Poote, A. E. y O. B. A. van den Akker (2009): "British women's attitudes to surrogacy", Human Reproduction, 24(1), pp. 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den338
  • Rahimi, F., A. Zandi, R. Omani Samani, S. Maroufizadeh y A. Mehran (2016): "Development and validation of attitude toward gestational surrogacy scale in iranian infertile couples", International Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 10(1), pp. 113-119.
  • Rahmani, A., N. Sattarzadeh, L. Gholizadeh, Z. Sheikhalipour, A. Allahbakhshian y H. Hassankhani (2011): "Gestational surrogacy: viewpoint of Iranian infertile women", Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 4(3), pp. 138-142. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92288
  • Rahmani, A., F. Howard, N. Sattar Zadeh, C. Ferguson, A. Asgari y H. Ebrahimi (2014): "Viewpoints of fertile women on gestational surrogacy in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran", Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 11(1), pp. 29-33. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2014.008
  • Ravin, A. J., M. B. Mahowald y C. B. Stocking (1997): "Genes or Gestation? Attitudes of Women and Men about Biologic Ties to Children", Journal of Women's Health, 6(6), pp. 639-647. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1997.6.639
  • Sádaba, M. T. (2001): "Origen, aplicación y límites de la 'teoría del encuadre' (framing) en comunicación", Comunicación y Sociedad, 14(2), pp. 143-175.
  • Saito, Y. y H. Matsuo (2009): "Survey of Japanese infertile couples' attitudes toward surrogacy", Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 30(3), 156-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820802429435
  • Sardiñas, L., S. Sayers-Montalvo, L. Padilla-Cotto y M. Cordero-Soto (2014): "Validación final de la escala de actitud de la población femenina hacia la subrogacía (EAHS)", Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 25(2), pp. 342-352.
  • Söderström-Anttila, V., U.-B. Wennerholm, A. Loft, A. Pinborg, K. Aittomäki, L. B. Romundstad y C. Bergh (2015): "Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families-a systematic review", Human Reproduction, 22(2), pp. 260-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv046
  • Stöbel-Richter, Y., S. Goldschmidt, E. Brähler, K. Weidner y M. Beutel (2009): "Egg donation, surrogate mothering, and cloning: attitudes of men and women in Germany based on a representative survey", Fertility and Sterility, 92(1), pp. 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.015
  • Suzuki, K., K. Hoshi, J. Minai, T. Yanaihara, Y. Takeda y Z. Yamagata (2006): "Analysis of national representative opinion surveys concerning gestational surrogacy in Japan", European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology abd Reproductive Biology, 126(1), pp. 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.030
  • Teman, E. (2003): "The medicalization of "nature" in the "artificial body": surrogate motherhood in Israel", Medical Anthopology Quarterly, 17(1), pp. 78-98.
  • Teman, E. (2008): "The social construction of surrogacy research: An anthropological critique of the psychosocial scholarship on surrogate motherhood", Social Science & Medicine, 67(7), pp. 1104-1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.026
  • Weiss, G. L. (1992): "Public Attitudes About Surrogate Motherhood", Michigan Sociological Review, (6), pp. 15-27.
  • Wennber, A. L., K. A. Rodríguez-Wallberg, I. Milsom y M. Brännström (2015): "Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: a survey in women 30-39 years of age", Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica (AOGS), 95(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12781
Datuen iturria: Dialnet