Factores claves que afectan a la preferencia trófica y diversidad de coleópteros copro-necrófagos del bosque Atlántico de Argentinauna propuesta de conservación

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alvarado, F., Escobar, F., Williams, D.R., Arroyo-Rodriguez, V. y Escobar-Hernández, F. (2018). The role of livestock intensification and landscape structure in maintaining tropical biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12957.
• Andrade-Núñez, M.J. y Aide, T.M. (2010). Effects of habitat and landscape characteristics on medium and large mammal species richness and composition in northern Uruguay. Zoologia, 27: 909-917. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/zool/v27n6/12.pdf.
• Andresen, E. (2003). Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetles communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration. Ecography, 26: 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03362.x.
• Andresen, E. y Feer, F. (2005). The role of dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers and their effect on plant regeneration in tropical rainforests. En: Forget, P.M., Lambert, J.E., Hulme, P.E. y Vander Wall, S.B. (eds.). Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment. CABI International, Wallingford, UK. pp 331–349.
• Anduaga, S. y Halffter, G. (1993). Nidificación y alimentación en Lia tongus rhinocerulus (Bates) (Coleoptera:Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Acta Zoologica Mexicana, 57: 1-4.
• http://www.acuedi.org/doc/2833/nidificacin-y-alimentacin-en-lia-tongus-rhinocerulus-%28bates%29-%28coleoptera-scarabaeidae-scarabaeinae%29.html.
• Arellano, L., León-Cortés, J. y Halffter, G. (2008). Response of dung beetle assemblages to landscape structure in remnant natural and modified habitats in southern Mexico. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 1: 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00033.x.
• Audino, I., Louzada, J. y Comita, L. (2014). Dung beetles as indicators of tropical forest restoration success: is it possible to recover species and functional diversity?. Biological Conservation, 169: 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.023.
• Bang, H.S., Lee, J.H., Kwon, O.S., EunNa, Y., Jang, Y.S. y Kim, W.H. (2005). Effects of paracoprid dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the growth of pasture herbage and on the underlying soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 29: 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.11.001.
• Bogoni, J.A. y Hernández, M.I.M. (2014). Attractiveness of Native Mammal´s feces of different trophic guilds to dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). Journal of Insect Science, 14, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu161.
• Bornemissza, G.E. y Williams, C.H. (1970). An effect of dung beetles activity on plant yield. Pedobiologia, 10: 1-7. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19740516596.
• Broennimann, O., Fitzpatrick, M.C., Pearman, P.B., Petitpierre, B., Pellissier, L., Yoccoz, N.G., Thuiller, W., Fortin, M.J., Randin, C., Zimmermann, N.E., Graham, C.H. y Antonie, G. (2012). Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 21: 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00698.x.
• Bustos-Gómez, F. y Lopera Toro, A. (2003). Preferencia por cebo de los escarabajos coprofagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) de un remante de bosque seco tropical al norte de Tolima (Colombia). Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 30: 59-65.
• Cabrera. (1971). Fitogeografía de Argentina. Boletín de sociedad Argentina de Botánica, Volúmen XIV, Nro 1-2.
• Cambefort, Y. y Hanski, I. (1991). Dung beetle population biology. En: Hanski, I. y Camberfort, Y (eds.). Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. pp 36-50.
• Campanello, P.I., Montti, L., Goldstein, G. y Mac Donagh, P. (2009). Reduced impact logging and post-harvesting forest management in the Atlantic Forest: alternative approaches to enhance canopy tree growth and regeneration and to reduce the impact of invasive species. En: Grossberg, S.P. (ed.). Forest management. Nova Science. New York. pp 39–59.
• Chao, A., Ma, KH. y Hsieh, T.C. (2016). iNEXT (iNterpolation and EXTrapolation) Online: software for interpolation and extrapolation of species diversity. Program and user’s guide. http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software_download/.
• Chown, S.L. (2001). Physiological variation in insects: hierarchical levels and implications. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47:649–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00163-3.
• Christie, F.J. y Hochuli, D.F. (2008). Responses of wasp communities to urbanization: effects on community resilience and species diversity. Journal of Insect Conservation, 13: 213-221. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10841-008-9146-5.
• Clarke, K.R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austral Journal of Ecology, 18:117–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x.
• Clarke, K.R. y Gorley, R.N. (2006). PRIMER v6. User manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth.
• Culot, L., Bovy, R., Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z., Guevara, R. y Galetti, M. (2013). Selective defaunation affects dung beetle communities in continuous Atlantic rainforest. Biological Conservation, 163: 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.004.
• Davies, K.F. y Margules, C.R. (1998). Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidence. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67: 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00210.x.
• Davis, A.L.V. (1996). Seasonal dung beetle activity and dung dispersal in selected South African habitats: implications for pasture improvement in Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 58: 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(96)01030-4.
• Davis, A.L.V., Chown, S.L., McGeoch, M.A. y Scholtz, C.H. (2000). A comparative analysis of metabolic rate in six Scarabaeus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from southern Africa: further caveats when inferring adaptation. Journal of Insect Physiology, 46:553–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00141-9.
• Davis, A.L.V., Van Aarde, R.J., Scholtz, C.H. y Delport, J.H. (2002). Increasing representation of localized dung beetles across a chronosequence of regenerating vegetation and natural dune forest in South Africa. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11: 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00283.x.
• Davis, A.L.V., Frolov, A.V. y Scholtz, C.H. (2008). The African dung beetle genera. Protea Book Publishers, Pretoria.
• Da Silva, P.G., Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z. y Di Mare, R.A. (2013). Diversity and seasonality of Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in forest fragments in Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 85: 679-697. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aabc/2013nahead/0001-3765-aabc-00-00-3313.pdf.
• Da Silva, P.G. y Hernández, M.I.M. (2015). Spatial Patterns of Movement of Dung Beetle Species in a Tropical Forest Suggest a New Trap Spacing for Dung Beetle Biodiversity Studies. PLoS ONE, 10: e0126112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126112.
• Da Silva, P.G. y Hernández, M.I.M. (2016). Spatial variation of dung beetle assemblages associated with forest structure in remnants of southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Revista Brasileira de Entomología, 60: 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2015.11.001.
• De Angelo, C. (2009). El paisaje del bosque Atlántico del Alto Paraná y sus efectos sobre la distribución y estructura poblacional del jaguar (Panthera onca) y el puma (Puma concolor). Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://documentop.com/de-angelo-2009-tesis-uba-el-paisaje-del-bosque-atlantico-del-alto-parana-y-sus-e_59fc9c3b1723dd376cb47113.html.
• Dinghi, P.A., Sánchez, M.V., Cantil, L.F., Sarzetti, L.C. y Genise, J.F. (2013). Leaf-litter brood chambers in dichotomius (luederwaldtinia) carbonarius (mannerheim, 1829) (coleoptera: scarabaeidae): a novel behavior for dung beetles. Coleopterist Bulletin, 67:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-67.3.388.
• Dinno, A. (2017). Conover.prueba: Conover-Iman Prueba of Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. R package version 1.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=conover.prueba.
• Dirzo, R. y Raven, P.H. (2003). Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annual Reviews Environment and Resources, 28: 137-167. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532.
• Di Bitetti, M.S., Placci, G. y Dietz, L.A. (2003). A biodiversity vision for the upper Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion: Designin a Biodiversity Conservation Landscape and Setting Priorities for Conservation Action. World Wild life Fund. Washington, D.C, U.S.A. https://www.coursehero.com/file/29404962/A-Biodiversity-Vision-for-the-Upper-Parana-Atlantic-Forest-Ecoregiondoc/.
• Duncan, F.D. y Byrne, M.J. (2000). Discontinuos gas exchange in dung beetles: patterns and ecological implications. Oecologia, 12: 452-458. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s004420050966.
• Estrada, A. y Coates-Estrada, R. (1991). Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) and seed dispersal: ecological interactions in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Journal of tropical ecology, 7: 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740000585X.
• Filgueiras, B.K.C., Liberal, C.N., Aguiar, C.D.M., Hernández, M.I.I. y Iannuzzi, L. (2009). Attractivity of omnivore carnivore and herbivore mammalian dung to Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae) in a tropical Atlantic Forest remnant. Revista Brasileira de Entomología, 53: 422–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262009000300017.
• Fincher, G.T., Stewart, T.B. y Davis, R. (1970). Attraction of coprophagous beetles to dung of various animals. Journal of Parasitology, 56: 378-383. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3277680.
• Galbiati, C., Bensi, C., Conceição, C.H.C., Florcoviski, J.F. y Calafiori, M.H. (1995). Estudo comparativo entre besouros do esterco Dichotomius anaglypticus (Mann., 1829) e Onthophagus gazella (F.), sobre a pastagem, em condições brasileiras. Ecosistema, 20: 109-118.
• Gardner, T.A., Hernández, M.I.M., Barlow, J. y Peres, C.A. (2008). Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for neotropical dung beetles. Journal of applied ecology, 45: 883-893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01454.x.
• Giménez Gómez, V.C., Verdú, J.R., Gómez-Cifuentes, A., Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z. y Zurita, G.A. (2018a). Influence of land use on the trophic niche overlap of dung beetles in the semideciduous Atlantic forest of Argentina. Insect conservation and diversity, 11: 554-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12299.
• Giménez Gómez, V.C., Verdú, J.R., Guerra Alonso, C. y Zurita, G.A. (2018b). Relationship between land uses and diversity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the southern Atlantic forest of Argentina: which are the key factors?. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27: 3201-3213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1597-8.
• Gómez-Cifuentes, A., Munevar, A., Gimenez, V.C., Gatti, M.G. y Zurita, G.A. (2017). Influence of land use on the taxonomic and functional diversity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the southern Atlantic forest of Argentina. Journal of Insect Conservation, 21: 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9964-4.
• Gómez-Cifuentes, A., Giménez Gómez, V.C., Moreno, C.E. y Zurita, G.A. (2018). Dung beetles diversity in livestock areas in the southern Atlantic forest: the role of microclimatic conditions and soil structure. Basic and Applied Ecology, 34: 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12957.
• Halffter, G. y Matthews, E.G. (1966). The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Sociedad Mexicana de Entomologia, 14: 1-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnz.19690450211.
• Halffter, G., Favila, M.E. y Halffter, V. (1992). A comparative study of the structure of the scarab guild in Mexican tropical rain forests and derived ecosystems. Revista Entomológica Mexicana, 84: 131–156.
• Halffter, G. y Arellano, L. (2002). Response of Dung Beetle Diversity to Human-induced Changes in a Tropical Landscape. Biotropica, 34: 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00250.x.
• Halffter, G. y Halffter, V. (2009). Why and where coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) eat seed, fruits or vegetable detritus. Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 45: 1-22.
• Hammer, O., Harper, D.A.T. y Ryan, P.D. (2001). Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontología Electrónica, 4: 1–9.
• Hanafy, H.E.M. (2012). Effect of dung beetles, Scarabaeus sacer (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) on certain biochemical contents of leaves and fruits of tomato and squash plants. Journal of Applied Science Research, 8: 4927-4936. http://www.aensiweb.com/jasr/jasr/20133057734.
• Hanski, I. y Cambefort, Y. (1991). Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Hernández, M.I.M. y Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z. (2009). Seasonal and spatial species richness variation of dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae s. str.) in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 53: 607–613. HTTP://www.scielo.br/rbent.
• Hernández, M.I.M., Barreto, P.S.C.S., Costa, V.H., Creao-Duarte, J. y Favila, M.E. (2014). Response of a dung beetle assemblage along a reforestation gradient in Restinga forest. Journal of Insect Conservation, 18: 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9645-5.
• Hewavithana, D.K., Wijesinghe, M.R., Dangalle, C.D. y Dharmarathna, H.A.S. (2016). Habitat and dung preferences of scarab beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae: a case study in a tropical monsoon forest in Sri Lanka. International Journal Tropical Insect Science, 36:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758416000023.
• Holter, P., Scholtz, C.H. y Stenseng, L. (2009). Desert detritivory: nutritional ecology of a dung beetle (Pachysoma glentoni) subsisting on plant litter in arid South African sand dunes. Journal of Arid Environment, 73:1090–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.04.009.
• Holz, S. y Placci, G. (2003). Socioeconomic roots of biodiversity loss in Misiones. En: Galindo-Leal, C. y Gusmão Câmara, I. (eds.). Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Washington, D.C, U.S.A. pp 207-226.
• Izquierdo, A.E., De Angelo, C.D. y Aide, T.M. (2008). Thirty years of human demography and land use change in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina: an evaluation of the forest transition model. Ecology Society, 13: 3. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art3/.
• Larsen, T.H. y Forsyth, A. (2005). Trap Spacing and Transect Design for Dung Beetles Biodiversity Studies. Biotropica, 37: 322-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00042.x.
• Marsh, C.J., Louzada, J., Beiroz, W. y Ewers, R.M. (2013). Optimising bait for pitfall trapping of Amazonian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). PLoS ONE, 8: e73147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073147.
• Monteith, G.B. y Storey, R.I. (1981). The biology of Cephalodesmius, a genus of dung beetles which synthesizes “dung” from plant material (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 20:253–277. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/154556#/summary.
• Myers, M., Mittermeir, R.A., Mittermeir, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B. y Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501.
• Myers, N. y Knoll, A.H. (2001). The biotic crisis and the future of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98: 5389-5392. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091092498.
• Neita, J.C. y Escobar, F. (2012). The potential value of agroforestry to dung beetle diversity in the wet tropical forests of the Pacific lowlands of Colombia. Agroforestry Systems, 85: 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9445-9.
• Nichols, E., Larsen, T., Spector, S., Davis, A.L., Escobar, F., Favila, M. y Vulinec, K. (2007). Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 137: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023.
• Nichols, E., Spector, S., Louzada, J., Larsen, T., Amezquita, S. y Favila, M.E. (2008). Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological conservation, 141: 1461-1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011.
• Nichols, E., Gardner, T.A., Peres, C.A. y Spector, S. (2009). Co-declining mammals and dung beetles: an impending ecological cascade. Oikos, 118: 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17268.x.
• Nichols, E., Uriarte, M., Bunker, D.E., Favila, M.E., Slade, E.M., Vulinec, K., Larsen, T., Vaz-de-Mello, F.Z., Louzada, J., Naeem, S. y Spector, S.H. (2013). Trait-dependent response of dung beetle populations to tropical forest conversion at local and regional scales. Ecology, 94: 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0251.1.
• Novacek, M.J. y Cleland, E.E. (2001). The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98: 5466-5470. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091093698.
• Ocampo, F.C. y Hawks, D.C. (2006). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of the food relocation behaviour of the dung beetle tribe Euraniini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Invertebrate Systematics, 20: 557-570.
• Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.M., Szoecs, E. y Wagner, H. (2017). vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan2012.
• Oliveira-Filho, A.T. y Fontes, I.A.M. (2000). Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in Southeastern Brazil and the Influence of climate. Biotropica, 32: 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00619.x.
• Osberg, D.C., Doube, B.M. y Hanrahan, S.A. (1994). Habitat specificity in African dung beetles. The effect of soil type on the survival of dung beetle immatures (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae). Tropical Zoology, 7: 1-10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03946975.1994.10539236.
• Peyras, M., Vespa, N., Bellocq, M. y Zurita, G. (2012). Quantifying edge effects: the role of habitat contrast and species specialization. Journal of Insect Conservation, 17: 807-820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9563-y.
• Philips, K., Pretorius, E. y Scholtz, C. (2004). A phylogenetic analysis of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae: Scarabaeidae): unrolling an evolutionary history. Invertebrate Systematics, 18: 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS03030.
• Quintero, I. y Roslin, T. (2005). Rapid recovery of dung beetle communities following habitat fragmentation in central Amazonia. Ecology, 12: 3303– 3311. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1960.
• Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Camargo Martensen, A., Ponzoni, F.J. y Hirota, M.M. (2009). The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142: 1141-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021.
• Sánchez-de-Jesús, H., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Andresen, E. y Escobar, F. (2016). Forest loss and matrix composition are the major drivers shaping dung beetle assemblages in a fragmented rainforest. Landscape Ecology, 31:843–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0293-2.
• Scheffler, P.Y. (2005). Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity and community structure across three disturbance regimes in eastern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21: 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467404001683.
• Schmitte, T., Thorsten, K.F. y Linsenmair, E. (2004). Quinone mixture as attractant for necrophagous dung beetles specialized on dead millipedes. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30: 731- 740. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000028428.53797.cb.
• Scholtz, C.H., Harrison, J.G. y Grebennikov, V.V. (2004). Dung beetle (Scarabaeus (Pachysoma)) biology and immature stages: reversal to ancestral states under desert conditions (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 83:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00389.x.
• Slade, E.M., Riutta, T., Roslin, T. y Tuomisto, H.L. (2016). The role of dung beetles in reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cattle farming. Nature, 6: 18140. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18140.
• Sowig, P. (1995). Habitat selection and offspring survival rate in three paracoprid dung beetles: the influence of soil type and soil moisture. Ecography, 18: 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1995.tb00335.x.
• Spector, S. (2006). Scarabaeine dung beetles (Coleopteran: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae): an invertebrate focal taxon for biodiversity research and conservation. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 60: 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X(2006)60[71:SDBCSS]2.0.CO;2.
• Tshikae, B.P., Davis, A.L.V. y Scholtz, C.H. (2013). Species richness - Energy relationships and dung beetle diversity across an aridity and trophic resource gradient. Acta Oecología, 49: 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2013.02.011.
• Tonelli, M. (2017). Effect of different pasture management on dung beetles communities in a sub-mountainous landscape of central Italy: a multicomponent biodiversity and ecological process analysis. Tesis doctoral. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/65761.
• Tuff, K.T., Tuff, T. y Davies, K.F. (2016). A framework for integrating thermal biology into fragmentation research. Ecology Letter, 19:361–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12579.
• Verdú, J.R., Arellano, L., Numa, C. y Mico, E. (2007a). Roles of endothermy in niche differentiation for ball-rolling dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) along an altitudinal gradient. Ecological Entomology, 32: 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00907.x.
• Verdú, J.R., Moreno, C.E., Sánchez-Rojas, G., Numa, C., Galante, E. y Halffter, G. (2007b). Grazing promotes dung beetle diversity in the xeric landscape of a Mexican biosphere reserve. Biological Conservation, 140: 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.015.
• Verdú, J.R., Lobo, J.M., Sánchez-Piñero, F., Gallego, B., Numa, C., Lumaret, J.P., Cortez, V., Ortiz, A., Tonelli, M., García-Teba, R.A., Rodriguez, A. y Durán, J. (2018). Ivermectin residues disrupt dung beetle diversity, soil properties and ecosystem functioning: An interdisciplinary field study. Science of the Total Environment, 618: 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.331.
• Vulinec, K. (2002). Dung beetles communities and seed dispersal in primary forest and disturbed land in Amazonia. Biotropica, 34: 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00541.x.
• Zaninovich, S.C., Fontana, J.L. y Gatti, M.G. (2016). Atlantic forest replacement by non-native tree plantations: comparing aboveground necromass between native forest and pine plantation ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 363:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.022.
• Zurita, G.A. y Bellocq, M.I. (2012). Bird assemblages in anthropogenic habitats: identifying a suitability gradient for native species in the Atlantic forest. Biotropica, 44: 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00821.x.