Location decisions and agglomeration economiesdomestic and foreign companies

  1. Enrique Claver Cortés 1
  2. Bartolomé Marco Lajara 1
  3. Encarnación Manresa-Marhuenda 1
  4. Francisco García Lillo 1
  5. Pedro Seva Larrosa 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Aldizkaria:
Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

ISSN: 1695-7253,  2340-2717

Argitalpen urtea: 2017

Zenbakien izenburua: Clusters, industrial districts and strategy

Zenbakia: 39

Orrialdeak: 99-135

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

Laburpena

The international expansion of multinational enterprises (MNEs) is one of the topics most frequently discussed amongst international business scholars. In particular, decisions regarding firm location and its effects on performance have received great attention. The results obtained in the study about this relationship are inconclusive, though, since a large number of studies have been conducted from very different perspectives. One of these perspectives suggests that the location in agglomerations allows MNEs to benefit from potential knowledge spillovers encouraging innovation and local adaptation. However, this co-location increases the risk of imitation by domestic companies as well. Furthermore, the acquisition by each firm of the external knowledge generated by means of concentration depends on its internal capabilities, and especially on its absorptive capacity. The aim sought with this work consists in analyzing the location decisions adopted by MNEs in an attempt to clarify the following issues: Are MNEs more likely to be established in agglomerations? Which companies benefit the most from geographical proximity in terms of innovation, domestic or foreign ones? What is the role of absorptive capacity? The results obtained in the analysis, carried out with a sample of firms and using data from a survey conducted in 2013 by PITEC, reveal the differences between foreign and local companies when it comes to using external knowledge.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Alcácer, J., Deszo, C., and Zhao, M. (2013): Firm rivalry, knowledge accumulation, and MNE location choices, Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5), pp. 504-520.
  • Alcácer, J., and Chung, W. (2014): Location Strategies for Agglomeration Economies, Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), pp. 1749-1761.
  • Almeida, P. (1996): Knowledge Sourcing by Foreign Multinationals: Patent Citation Analysis on The Semiconductor Industry, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 155-165.
  • Anderson, E., and Gatignon, H. (1986): Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), pp. 1-26.
  • Anderson, M., and Johansson, B. (2008): Innovation Ideas and Regional Characteristics- innovations and export entrepreneurship by firms in Swedish Regions, Growth and Change, 39, pp. 193-224.
  • Anselin, L., Varga, A., and Acs, Z. J. (1997): Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations, Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3), pp. 422-448.
  • Appold, S. J. (1995): Agglomeration, Interorganizational Networks, and Competitive Performance in the US Metalworking Sector, Economic Geography, 71(1), pp. 27-54.
  • Arikan, A. T., and Schilling, M. A. (2010): Structure and Governance in Industrial Districts: Implications for Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management Studies, 28(4), pp. 772-803.
  • Arrow, K. (1962): The Economic Implication of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), pp. 153-173.
  • Audretsch, D. B. (2003): Innovation and Spatial Externalities, International Regional Science Review, 26(2), pp. 167-174.
  • Audretsch, D. B., and Feldman, M. P. (1996): R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production, American Economic Review, LXXXVI, pp. 237-254.
  • Barge-Gil, A., Vásquez, A., and Rico, M., (2011): El impacto de los parques científicos y tecnológicos españoles sobre la innovación empresarial según distintos tipos de empresas. La innovación como factor de competitividad de la empresa española, ICE: Revista de economía, 860, pp. 73-88.
  • Bottazzi, L., and Peri, G. (2002): Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence form European Patent Data, European Economic Review, 47, pp. 687-710.
  • Buckley, P. J., and Casson, M. (1976): The Future of the Multi-National Enterprise, New York, Holmes & Meier.
  • Cantwell, J., and Mudambi, R. (2005): MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates, Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), pp. 1109-1128.
  • Cantwell, J., and Molero, J. (2003): Multinational Enterprises, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Casson, M. (ed.) (1991): Global Research Strategy and International Competitiveness, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  • Caves, R. (1971): International corporations: the industrial economics of foreign investment, Economica, 38(149), pp. 1-27.
  • Cepeda-Carrión, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., and Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2012): The effects of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and Information systems capability as catalysts, British Journal of Management, 23(1), pp. 110-129.
  • Chang, S. J., and Park, S. (2005): Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs’ co-location decisions, Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), pp. 595-616.
  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003): The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property, California Management Review, 45(3), pp. 33-58.
  • Chung, W., and Alcacer, J. (2002): Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States, Management Science, 48(12), pp. 1534-1554.
  • Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., and Manresa-Marhuenda, E. (2016): Types of Agglomeration Economies: Effects on Bussiness Innovation, Contemporary Economics 10(3), pp. 217-232.
  • Coase, R. H. (1937): The nature of the firm, Economica, 4(16), pp. 386-405.
  • Cohen, W. (1995): Empirical Studies in Innovative Activity, in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, pp. 182-264, Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D. (1990): Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152.
  • Colombo, M. G., and Delmastro, M. (2002): How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy, Research Policy, 31, pp. 1103-1122.
  • Cook, P. (2004): Evolution of regional innovation systems: emergence, theory, and challenge for action, in Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., and Braczyk, H. J. (eds.), Regional Innovation Systems, pp. 1-18. London, Routledge.
  • Cook, G., Pandit, N., Loof, H., and Johansson, B. (2013): Clustering, Mnes and Innovation: Who Benefits, and How?, International Journal for the Economics of Business, 20(2), pp. 203-227.
  • Damanpour, F., and Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998): Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, pp. 1-24.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1977): Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach, in Ohlin, B. G., Hesselborn, P. O. & Wijkman, P. M. (eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London, Macmillan.
  • Dunning, J. H. (1993): Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Wokingham, England, Addison- Wesley, Elron.
  • Dunning, J. H. (2001): The key literature on IB activities: 1960-2000, in Rugman, A. M., & Brewer, T. L. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, pp. 36-68. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Dutta, S., and Weiss, A. M. (1997): The Relationship Between a Firm’s Level of Technological Innovativeness and Its Pattern of Partnership Agreements, Management Science, 43(3), pp. 343-56.
  • Eaton, J., and Kortum, S. (1999): International technology diffusion: Theory and measurement, International Economic Review, 40(3), pp. 537-70.
  • Felsenstein, D. (1994): University-related science parks - “seedbeds” or “enclaves” of innovation?, Technovation, 14(2), pp. 93-110.
  • Fernández-Mesa, A., Alegre, J., and García-Granero, A. (2014): Capacidades organizativas e innovación: ¿Qué ocurre en la industria española del juguete?, Economía Industrial, 391, pp. 49-58.
  • Flyer, F., and Shaver, J. M. (2003): Location Choices under Agglomeration Externalities and Strategic Interaction, in Baum, J. A. C., & Sorenson, O. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management: Geography and Strategy, vol. 20, pp. 193-214, Amsterdam, Elsevier JAI.
  • Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., and Baik, Y. (2006): Geographic Cluster Size and Firm Performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), pp. 217-242.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., and Verburg, T. (2007): Relate Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth, Regional Studies, 41(5), pp. 685-697.
  • George, G., Zahra, S. A., Wheatley, K., and Khan, R. (2001): The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: a study of biotechnology firms, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2), pp. 205-227.
  • Giuliani, E., Gorgoni, S., Günther, C., and Rabelloti, R. (2014): Emerging versus advanced country MNEs investing in Europe: A typology of subsidiary global-local connections, International Business Review, 23(4), pp. 680-691.
  • Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A. (1992): Growth in Cities, The Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), pp. 1126-1152.
  • Glasmeier, A. K. (1991): Technological Discontinuities and Flexible Production Networks: The Case of Switzerland and the World Watch Industry, Research Policy, 20(5), pp. 469-485.
  • Gong, H. (1995): Spatial Patterns of Foreign Investment in China’s Cities, 1980-1989, Urban Geography, XVI, pp. 198-209.
  • Grant, R. M (1996): Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 109-122.
  • Head, K., Ries, J., and Swenson, D. (1995): Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States, Journal of International Economics, 38(3-4), pp. 223-247.
  • Head, K. (1999): Attracting foreign manufacturing: Investment promotion and agglomeration, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(2), pp. 197-218.
  • Henderson, R., and Clark, K. (1990): Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 81-112.
  • Henderson, R., and Cockburn, I. (1994): Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research, Strategic Management Journal, 15(Special Issue), pp. 63-84.
  • Hennart, J. F. (1991a): The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States, Management Science, 34(4), pp. 483-497.
  • Hennart, J. F. (1991b): Control in multi-national firms: the role of prices and hierarchy, Management International Review, 31, pp. 71-96.
  • Hervás, J. L., González, G., and Sempere, F. (2015): Clusters, Multinacionales y Procesos de Multi-localización: Una Introducción Necesaria, Economía Industrial, 397, pp. 11-20.
  • Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., and Kim, W. C. (1990): An Eclectic Theory of the Choice on International Entry Mode, Strategic Management Journal, 11, pp. 117-128.
  • Hirsch, S. (1976): An International trade and investment theory of the firm, Oxford Economic Papers, 28, pp. 258-270.
  • Horst, T. (1972): Firm and industry determinants of the decision to investment abroad: an empirical study, The review of economics and statistics, 54(3), pp. 258-266.
  • Jacobs, J. (1969): The Economy of Cities, New York, Random House.
  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993): Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), pp. 577-598.
  • Knoben, J., Oerlemans, L. A. G., and Rutten, R. P. J. H. (2008): The Effects of Spatial Mobility on the Performance of Firms, Economic Geography, 84(2), pp. 157-183.
  • Knoben, J., Arikan, A. T., Oort, F., and Raspe, O. (2016): Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm’s medicine is another firm’s poison, Environment and Planning A, 48(1), pp. 132-153.
  • Kogut, B. (1988): Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 319-332.
  • Kogut, B., and Zander, U. (1992): Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology, Organization Science, 3, pp. 383-397.
  • Lane, P. J., and Lubatkin, M. (1998): Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp. 461-477.
  • Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., and Pathak, S. (2006): The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct, Academy of Management Review, 31(4), pp. 833-863.
  • Laursen, K., and Salter, A. (2006): Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining innovation performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 131-150.
  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2009): Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes, Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), pp. 822-846.
  • Löfsten, H., and Lindelöf, P. (2003): Determinants for an Entrepreneurial Milieu: Science Parks and Business Policy in Growing Firms, Technovation, 23, pp. 51-64.
  • Makino, S., Lau, C., and Yeh, R. (2002): Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: Implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies, Journal of International Business Studies, 33, pp. 403-421.
  • Malmberg, A., and Maskell, P. (2002): The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering, Environment and Planning, 34, pp. 429-449.
  • Mangematin, V., and Nesta, L. (1999): What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb?, International Journal of Technology Management, 18(3/4), pp. 149-172.
  • Marco-Lajara, B., Claver-Cortés, E., Úbeda-García, M., and Zaragoza-Sáez, P. C. (2016): Hotel Performance and Agglomeration of Tourist Districts, Regional Studies, 50(6), pp. 1016-1035.
  • Mariotti, S., Piscitello, L., and Elia, S. (2010): Spatial agglomeration of multinational enterprises: the role of information externalities and knowledge spillovers, Journal of Economic Geography, 10, pp. 519-538.
  • Mariotti, S. (2014): Local externalities and ownership choices in foreign acquisitions by multinational enterprises, Economic Geography, 90(2), pp. 187-211.
  • Marshall, A. (1890/1920): Principles of Economics, London, MacMillan.
  • Martínez-Senra, A. I., Quintás, M. A., Sartal, A., and Vázquez, X. H. (2013): ¿Es rentable “pensar por pensar”? Evidencia sobre innovación en España, Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 16, pp. 142-153.
  • McCann, B. T., and Folta, T. B. (2011): Performance differentials within geographic clusters, Journal of Business Venturing, 26, pp. 104-123.
  • Mcevily, B., and Zaheer, A. (1999): Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), pp. 1133-1156.
  • Melo, P. C., Graham, D. J., and Noland, R. B. (2009): A Meta-Analysis of Estimates of Urban Agglomeration Economies, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(3), pp. 332-342.
  • Meyer, K. E., and Nguyen, H. V. (2005): Foreign Investment Strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: evidence from Vietnam, Journal of Management Studies, 42, pp. 63-93.
  • Montoro-Sánchez, M. A., Mora-Valentín, E. M., and Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. (2012): Localización en parques científicos y tecnológicos y cooperación en I+D+i como factores determinantes de la innovación, Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 21(2), pp. 182-190.
  • Mudambi, R. (1998): The Role of duration in Multinational Investment Strategies, Journal of International Business Studies, 29, pp. 239-262.
  • Mudambi, R. (2008): Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries, Journal of Economic Geography, VIII, pp. 699-725.
  • Murovec, N., and Prodan, I. (2009): Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model, Technovation, 29(12), pp. 859-872.
  • Nachum, L., and Keeble, D. (2003): Neo-Marshallian Clusters and Global Networks: The Linkages of Media Firms in Central London, Long Range Planning, 36(5), pp. 459-480.
  • Nachum, L., and Wymbs, C. (2005): Product differentiation, external economies and MNE location choices: M&As in Global Cities, Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), pp. 415-434.
  • OCDE (2005): Manual de Oslo: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, París, OCDE and Eurostat, 3a. edition.
  • Owen-Smith, J., and Powell, W. W. (2004): Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community, Organization Science, 15(1), pp. 5-21.
  • Patel, P., and Pavitt, K. (1995): Patterns of Technological Activity: Their Measurement and Interpretation, in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, pp. 14-52, Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Pearce, R. D., and Singh, S. (1991): Globalizing Research and Development, London, Macmillan.
  • Pelegrin, A., and Bolance, C. (2008): Regional Foreign Direct Investment in Manufacturing. Do Agglomeration Economies Matter?, Regional Studies, XLII, pp. 505-522.
  • Persson, M. (2006): Unpacking the Flow, Knowledge Transfer in the MNCs. PhD-dissertation, Uppsala University.
  • Porter, M. E., and Stern, S. (2001): Innovation. Location matter, MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), pp. 28-36.
  • Pouder, R., and StJohn, C. H. (1996): Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation, Academy of Management Review, 21(4), pp. 1192-1225.
  • Powell, W., Koput, K., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996): Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp. 116-145.
  • Prevezer, M. (1997): The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering in Biotechnology, Small Business Economics, 9(3), pp. 255-271.
  • Rosenthal, S. S., and Strange, W. C. (2004): Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies, in Henderson, J. V., & Thisse, J. F. (ed.), Handbook of urban and regional economics, vol. 4, pp. 2119-2172, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
  • Rothaemel, F. T., and Hess, A. M. (2007): Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects, Organization Science, 18(6), pp. 898-921.
  • Saxenian, A. (1996): Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
  • Sethi, D., Guisinger, S. E., Phelan, S. E., and Berg, M. D. (2003): Trends in Foreign Direct Investment Flows: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Journal of International Business Studies, XXXIV, pp. 315-326.
  • Shaver, J. M., and Flyer, F. (2000): Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity and foreign direct investment in the United States, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 1175-1193.
  • Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., and Wright, M. (2003): Assessing the Impact of Science Parks on Research Productivity: Exploratory Firm-level Evidence from the United Kingdom, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, pp. 1357-1369.
  • Sørensen, J., and Stuart, T. (2000): Aging and organizational innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, pp. 81-112.
  • Squicciarini, M. (2008): Science Parks’ Tenants versus out-of-Park Firms: Who Innovates more? A Duration Model, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), pp. 45-71.
  • Squicciarini, M. (2009): Science Parks: Seedbeds of Innovation? A Duration Analysis of Firms’ Patenting Activity, Small Business Economics, 32(2), pp. 169-190.
  • Stuart, T., and Sorenson, O. (2003): The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms, Research Policy, 32, pp. 229-253.
  • Swann, G. M. P., Prevezer M., and Stout, D. (eds.) (1998): The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering: International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Szulanski, G. (1996): Exploring Internal Stickness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 27-44.
  • Tallman, S., and Chacar, A. (2011): Communities, alliances, networks and knowledge in multinational firms: a micro-analytic framework, Journal of International Management, 17(3), pp. 201-210.
  • Tan, D. C., and Meyer, K. E. (2011): Country-of-origin and industry FDI agglomeration of foreign investors in an emerging economy, Journal of International Business Studies, 42(4), pp. 504-520.
  • Teece, D. J. (1986): Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15(6), pp. 285-305.
  • Todorova, G., and Durisin, B. (2007): Absorptive Capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization, Academic Management Review, 32, pp. 774-786.
  • Urgal, B., Quintás, M. A., and Arévalo-Tomé, R. (2011): Conocimiento tecnológico, capacidad de innovación y desempeño innovador: el rol moderador del ambiente interno de la empresa, Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 14, pp. 53-66.
  • Varga, A., Dimitrios, P., and Chorafakis, G. (2014): Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity, Journal of Economic Geography, 14, pp. 229-263.
  • Vásquez-Urriago, A. R., Barge-Gil, A., Modrego-Rico, A., and Paraskevopoulou, E. (2014): The impact of science and technology parks on firms’ product innovation: empirical evidence from Spain, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(4), pp. 835-873.
  • Vernon, R. (1966): International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, pp. 190-207.
  • Verspagen, B., and Schoenmakers, W. (2004): The spatial dimension of patenting by multinational firms in Europe, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, pp. 23-42.
  • Veugelers, R., and Cassiman, B. (2004): Foreign Subsidiaries as a Channel of International Technology Diffusion, Some Direct Firm Level Evidence from Belgium, European Economic Review, 48(2), pp. 455-476.
  • Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., and Lyles, M. A. (2010): Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: how to realize its potential in the organization field, Organization Science, 21, pp. 931-951.
  • Wheeler, D., and Mody, A. (1992): International Investment Location Decisions: The Case of U.S. firms, Journal of International Economics, 33(1-2), pp. 57-76.
  • Zhang, F., and Cantwell, J. A. (2013): Regional and Global Technological Knowledge. Search Strategies and the Innovative Performance of Large Multinational Corporations, Industry and Innovation, 20(7), pp. 637-660.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet