Localización en parques científico-tecnológicos, capacidades dinámicas e innovación empresarial

  1. Enrique Claver Cortés
  2. Encarnación Manresa Marhuenda
  3. Bartolomé Marco Lajara
Aldizkaria:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Argitalpen urtea: 2015

Zenbakien izenburua: Clusters y multinacionales

Zenbakia: 397

Orrialdeak: 59-71

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Economía industrial

Laburpena

Two of the main characteristics of the science and technology parks (STPs) are the proximity between companies and other institutions and the rise of collaborative networks. These features promote external knowledge flows that can be used by firms in their innovation strategies in order to be more competitive. However, the location in a STP does not warrant the use of these advantages by companies located in them, which depends on individual dynamics capabilities. Considering a sample of 610 high-tech companies with data from PITEC, the results of this study show that innovation is positively influenced by the location in a STP and by dynamic capabilities, like absorptive and alliance management capacities, whose development is also improved in the context of STPs

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • AHUJA, G. y LAMPERT, C.M. (2001). «Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions», Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), pp. 521–543.
  • ALCÁCER, J. y CHUNG, W. (2014). «Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers». Management Science, 53 (5), pp. 760-776.
  • ANAND, B.N. y KHANNA, T. (2000). «Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances». Strategic Management Journal, nº 21, vol. 3, pp. 295-315.
  • BARGE-GIL, A.; VÁSQUEZ, A. y RICO, M., (2011). «El impacto de los parques científicos y tecnológicos españoles sobre la innovación empresarial según distintos tipos de empresas. La innovación como factor de competitividad de la empresa española». ICE: Revista de economía, nº 860, pp. 73–88.
  • BARON, R.M. y KENNY, D.A. (1986). «The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations». Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, nº 51, pp. 1173–1182
  • BEUGELSDIJK, S. (2007). «The Regional Environment and a Firm´s Innovative Performance: A plea for a multilevel interactionist App.roach». Economic Geography, nº 83, pp. 181-199.
  • BOSCHMA, R.A. y WAL, J. (2007):. «Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the south of Italy». Industry and Innovation, nº 14, pp. 177-199
  • BRESCHI, S. y LISSONI, F. (2001). «Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey«. Industrial and Corporate Change, nº 10, pp. 975-1005.
  • CALOGHIROU Y.; KASTELLI, I. y TSAKANIKAS, A. (2004). «Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?», Technovation, nº 24, vol. 1, pp. 29-39.
  • CEPEDA-CARRIÓN, G.; CEGARRA-NAVARRO, J.G. y JiménezJiménez, D. (2012). «The effects of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and Information systems capability as catalysts». British Journal of Management, nº 23, vol. 1, pp. 110-129.
  • CHESBROUGH, H.W. (2003). «The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property». California Management Review, nº 45, vol. 3, pp. 33-58.
  • COHEN, W. y LEVINTHAL, D. (1990). «Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation». Administrative Science Quarterly, nº 35, pp. 128-152.
  • COLOMBO, M. G. y DELMASTRO, M. (2002): «How effective are technology incubators? evidence from Italy». Research Policy, nº 31, pp... 1103-1122.
  • DAMANPOUR, F. y GOPALAKRISHNAN, S. (1998). «Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change». Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, nº 15, pp. 1-24.
  • DÍEZ-VIAL, I. y FERNÁNDEZ-OLMOS, M. (2015). «Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most?». The Journal of Technology Transfer, nº 40, pp. 70-84.
  • FELSENSTEIN, D. (1994). «University-related science parks ‘seedbeds’ or ‘enclaves’ of innovation?». Technovation, nº 14, vol. 2, pp. 93-110.
  • FERGUSON, R. y OLOFSSON, C. (2004). «Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs-Location, Survival and Growth». Journal of Technology Transfer, nº 29, pp. 5-17.
  • FUKUGAWA, N. (2006). «Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms». International Journal of Industrial Organization, nº 24, vol. 2, pp. 381-400.
  • FUNK, R.J. (2014). «Making the most of where you are: geography, networks, and innovation in organizations». Academy of Management Journal, nº 57, vol. 1, pp. 193-222.
  • GEORGE, G.; ZAHRA, S.A.; WHEATLEY, K. y KHAN, R. (2001): «The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: a study of biotechnology firms», Journal of High Technology Management Research, nº 12, vol. 2, pp. 205- 227.
  • HENDERSON, R. y CLARK, K. (1990). «Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms». Administrative Science Quarterly, nº 35, vol. 1, pp. 81-112.
  • HENDERSON, R., y COCKBURN, I. (1994). «Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research». Strategic Management Journal, nº 15(Spec Iss), pp. 63-84.
  • HUANG, K.F.; YU, C.M. y SEETOO, D.H. (2012). «Firm innovation in policy-driven parks and spontaneous clusters: The smaller firm the better?». The Journal of Technology Transfer, nº 37, pp. 715-731.
  • INKPEN, A. y TSANG, E. (2005). «Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer». Academy of Management Review, nº 30, pp. 146-165.
  • IRELAND, R.D.; HITT., M.A. y VAIDYANATH, D. (2002). «Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage». Journal of Management, nº 28, vol. 3, pp. 413-446.
  • JANSEN, J.J.P., VAN DEN BOSCH, F.A.J. y VOLBERDA, H.W. (2005). «Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter?». Academic Management Journal, nº 48, pp... 999-1015.
  • JIMÉNEZ-MORENO, J.J.; MARTÍNEZ-CAÑAS, R.; RUIZ-PALOMINO, P. y SÁEZ-MARTÍNEZ, F.J. (2013). «The Role of Science and Technology Parks in the Generation of Firm Level Social Capital Through University–Firm Relations: An Empirical Study in Spain», en Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Ed.): Cooperation, Clusters, and Knowledge Transfer, pp. 19-34.
  • JUDD, C.M. y KENNY, D.A. (1981). «Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluation». Evaluation Review, nº 5, pp. 307-321.
  • KAISER, U. (2002). «An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector». Research Policy, nº 20, pp. 747-774.
  • KALE P.; DYER J.H. y SINGH H. (2002). «Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function». Strategic Management Journal, nº 23, pp. 747- 767.
  • Katila, R. y Ahuja, G. (2002). «Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction». Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), pp. 1183-1194.
  • LANE, P.J.; SALK, J.E. y LYLES, M.A. (2001). «Absorptive Capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures». Strategic Management Journal, nº 22, pp. 1139-1161.
  • LAURSEN, K. y SALTER, A. (2006). «Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms». Strategic Management Journal, nº 27, pp. 131-150.
  • LAURSEN, K.; MASCIARELLI, F. y PRENCIPE, A. (2012). «Regions matter: Hoy localized social capital affect innovation and external knowledge acquisition». Organization Science, 23(1), pp. 177-193.
  • LÖFSTEN, H. y LINDELÖF, P. (2001). «Science Parks in Sweden Industrial Renewal and Development?». R&D Management, nº 31, pp. 309-322.
  • LÖFSTEN, H. y LINDELÖF, P. (2003). «Determinants for an Entrepreneurial Milieu: Science Parks and Business Policy in Growing Firms». Technovation, nº 23, pp. 51-64.
  • LORENZONI G. y LIPPARINI A. (1999). «The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study». Strategic Management Journal, nº 20, pp. 317-338.
  • MALAIRAJA, C. y ZAWDIE, G. (2008). «Science Parks adn University-Industry collaboration in Malaysia». Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, pp. 727-739.
  • MANGEMATIN, V. y NESTA, L. (1999). «What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb?». International Journal of Technology Management, nº 18, vol. 3/4, pp. 149-172.
  • MARQUIS, C. (2003). «The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in inter-corporate communities». Administrative Science Quarterly, nº 48, pp. 655-689.
  • MARTÍNEZ-SENRA, A.I.; QUINTÁS, M.A.; SARTAL, A. y VÁZQUEZ, X.H. (2013). «¿Es rentable “pensar por pensar”? Evidencia sobre innovación en España». Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, nº 16, pp. 142-153.
  • MASKELL, P. y MALMBERG, A. (1999). «Localised learning and industrial competitiveness». Cambridge Journal of Economics, nº 23, pp. 167-185.
  • McEVILY, B. y ZAHEER, A. (1999). «Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities». Strategic Management Journal, nº 20, pp. 1133-115.
  • MONTORO-SÁNCHEZ, M.A.; MORA-VALENTÍN, E.M. y ORTIZ DE URBINA-CRIADO, M. (2012). «Localización en parques científicos y tecnológicos y cooperación en I+D+i como factores determinantes de la innovación». Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, nº21, vol. 2, pp. 182-190.
  • MORRISON, A. (2008). «Gatekeepers Of Knowledge Within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How Do They Interact?». Regional Studies, nº42, vol. 6, pp. 817-835.
  • MORRISON, A. y RABELLOTTI, R (2009). «Knowledge and information networks in an Italian wine cluster». European Planning Studies, nº17, pp. 983-1006.
  • MULLER, D.; JUDD, C.M. y YZERBYT, V.Y. (2005). «When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated». Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, nº89, vol. 6, pp. 852–863.
  • MUROVEC, N. y PRODAN, I. (2009). «Absorptive capacity, its determnants, and influence on innovtion output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model». Technovation, nº29, vol. 12, pp. 859-872.
  • NARULA, R. y SANTANGELO, G.D. (2009). «Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry». Research Policy, nº 38, pp. 393-403.
  • NIESTEN, E. y JOLINK, A. (2015). «The Impact of Alliance Management Capabilities on Alliance Attributes and Performance: A Literature Review». International Journal of Management Reviews, nº17, vol. 1, pp. 69-100.
  • OCDE (2005): Guidelines for colLecting and interpreting innovation data: Oslo Manual. T. Ed.Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development y EURSTAT.
  • PETRONI, A. y PANCIROLI, B. (2002). «Innovation as a determinant of suppliers’ roles and performances: An empirical study in the food machinery industry». European Journal of Purchasing Supply Management, nº8, pp. 135-149.
  • ROTHAEMEL, F.T., y DEEDS, D.L. (2006). «Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures». Journal of Business Venturing, nº21, pp. 429-460.
  • ROTHAEMEL, F.T., y HESS, A.M. (2007). «Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and NetworkLevel Effects». Organization Science, nº18, vol. 6, pp. 898-921.
  • SCHILKE, O. (2014). «Second-order Dynamic Capabilities: How They Matter?». The Academic of Management Perspectives, nº 28, vol. 4, pp. 368-380.
  • SCHILKE, O. y GOERZEN, A. (2010). «Alliance management capability: an investigation of the construct and its measurement». Journal of Management, nº36, vol. 5, pp. 1192-1219.
  • SCHREINER, M.; KALE, P. y CORSTEN, D. (2009). «What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success?». Strategic Management Journal, nº 30, pp. 1395-1419.
  • SIEGEL, D. S.; WESTHEAD, P. y WRIGHT, M. (2003). «Assessing the Impact of Science Parks on Research Productivity: Exploratory Firmlevel Evidence from the United Kingdom». International Journal of Industrial Organization, nº 21, pp. 1357-1369.
  • SOFOULLI, E. y VONORTAS, N. (2007). «S&T Parks and Business Incubator in Middle-sized Countries: The Case of Greece». The Journal of Technology Transfer, nº 32, pp. 525-544.
  • SQUICCIARINI, M. (2008). «Science Parks’ Tenants versus out-ofPark Firms: Who Innovates more? A Duration Model». Journal of Technology Transfer, nº33, vol. 1, pp. 45–71.
  • SQUICCIARINI, M. (2009). «Science Parks: Seedbeds of Innovation? A Duration Analysis of Firms’ Patenting Activity». Small Business Economics, nº 32, vol. 2, pp. 169-190.
  • SØRENSEN, J. y STUART, T. (2000). «Aging and organizational innovation». Administrative Science Quarterly«. nº 45, pp. 81-112.
  • STUART, T. y SORENSON, O. (2003). «The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms». Research Policy, nº 32, pp. 229-253.
  • TALLMAN, S.; JENKINS, M.; HENRY, N. y PINCH, S. (2004). «Knowledge, clusters and competitive advantage». Academy of Management Review, nº 29, vol. 2, pp. 258-271.
  • TEECE, D.J.; PISANO, G. y SHUEN, A. (1997). «Dynamic capabilities and strategic management». Strategic Management Journal, nº 18, vol. 7, pp. 509-533.
  • URGAL, B.; QUINTÁS, M.A. y ARÉVALO-TOMÉ, R. (2011). «Cono cimiento tecnológico, capacidad de innovación y desempeño innovador: el rol moderador del ambiente interno de la empresa». Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, nº 14, pp. 53–66.
  • VÁSQUEZ-URRIAGO, A.R.; BARGE-GIL, A.; MODREGO-RICO, A. y Paraskevopoulou, E. (2014). «The impact of science and technology parks on firms’ product innovation: empirical evidence from Spain». Journal of Evolutionary Economics, nº 24, vol. 4, pp. 835- 873.
  • VERNON, R. (1966). «International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle». Quarterly Journal of Economics, nº 80, pp. 190-207.
  • VEUGELERS, R. (1997). «Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing». Research Policy, nº 26, pp. 303-315.
  • WANG, Y. y RAJAGOPALAN, N. (2015). «Alliance Capabilities: Review and Research Agenda». Journal of Management, nº 41, vol. 1, pp. 236-260.
  • WESTHEAD, P. (1997). «R&D Inputs and Outputs of Technologybased firms located on and off Science Parks». R&D Management, nº 27, pp. 45-62.
  • WINTER, S. G. (2003). «Understanding Dynamic Capabilities». Strategic Management Journal, nº 24, vol. 10, pp. 991-5.
  • WOOLCOCK, M. y NARAYAN, D. (2000). «Social Capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy». World Bank Res Ob, nº 15, vol. 2, pp. 225-249.
  • YANG, C.H.; MOTOHASHIB, K. y CHENC J.R., (2009). «Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative, Evidence from Taiwan, Research Policy, nº 38, pp. 77-85
Datuen iturria: Dialnet