La pérdida de oportunidades del aprendizaje gimnásticolas voces del profesorado de Educación Física de Educación Secundaria

  1. María-Alejandra ÁVALOS-RAMOS 1
  2. María-Ángeles MARTÍNEZ-RUIZ 1
  3. Gladys MERMA-MOLINA 1
  1. 1 Universitat d'Alacant
    info

    Universitat d'Alacant

    Alicante, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05t8bcz72

Revista:
Ágora para la educación física y el deporte

ISSN: 1578-2174

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 17

Número: 2

Páginas: 130-147

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Ágora para la educación física y el deporte

Resumen

Esta investigación se centra en analizar las causas de la fragilidad de los aprendizajes gimnásticos en el currículo de Educación Física en Educación Secundaria. Considerando que este hecho incide de forma desfavorable en la educación integral del alumnado, este estudio identifica las problemáticas que condicionan las lagunas en dichos aprendizajes. Para ello, se examinan las experiencias de 50 profesores sobre la formación universitaria recibida en la rama de habilidades gimnásticas y acrobáticas, las dificultades para implementar estos aprendizajes y las propuestas para optimizar su labor profesional. La metodología empleada es cualitativa y se ha utilizado el software AQUAD 6 para el análisis de los datos. Los resultados evidencian que los participantes han tenido un insuficiente conocimiento gimnástico en su formación inicial y una posterior falta de oportunidades de desarrollo profesional. Asimismo, otras dificultades percibidas están motivadas por las disposiciones negativas de los estudiantes hacia la práctica gimnástica. Los planteamientos de mejora de los profesores están enfocados a la resolución de dichas problemáticas. El profesorado demanda una formación universitaria más sólida y un desarrollo profesional específico como medio para resolver las dificultades metodológicas y contextuales percibidas. Conocer sus propuestas puede contribuir a implementar nuevos modelos de formación inicial y continua.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, J. R.; Greeno, J. G.; Reder, L. M. & Simon, H. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29, 11-13.
  • Arkaev, L. I. & Suchilin, N. G. (2004). How to create champions. The theory and methodology of training top systems and policies in six countries. Sport Management Review, 12, 113-136.
  • Bayraktar, G. (2011). The effect of cooperative learning on students’ approach to general gymnastics course and academic achievements. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(1), 62-71.
  • Bowman, C. (2000). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 256-261.
  • Bučar Pajek, Maja ; Čuk, Ivan; Kovač, Marjeta; Jakše, Barbara (2010). Implementation of the gymnastics curriculum in the third cycle of basic school in Slovenia. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2(3), 15-27.
  • Buzbee, P. F. (2005). Peer coaching as a support to collaborative teaching. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13(1), 83-94.
  • Cale, L. (1997). Gymnastics in the physical education curriculum. In L. Almond (Ed.), Physical Education in Schools (pp. 90-103). London: Kogan Page.
  • Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: The Jossey-Bass Education Series.
  • Clandinin, D. J.; Cave, M. & Cave, A. (2011). Narrative reflective practice in medical Education form residents: Composing shifting identities. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 2, 1-7.
  • Clandinin, D. J.; Huber, J.; Steeves, P. & Li, Y. (2011). Becoming a narrative inquirer: Learning to attend within the three-dimensional narrative inquiry space. In S. Trahar (Ed.), Learning and Teaching Narrative Inquiry. Travelling in the Borderlands (pp. 33-51). Amsterdan, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education Vol. 24 (pp. 249-306). Washington, DC: AERA.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance. Practitioner research for the next generation. Nueva York: Teachers College Press.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Evaluating teachers for the new century: rethinking practice and police. In G. A. Griffin (Ed.), The Education of Teachers. Ninety-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 221-256). Chicago: The University Press.
  • Decreto 112/2007 de 20 julio, del Consell, por el que se establece el currículo de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria en la Comunidad Valenciana [2007/9717] para el área de Educación Física.
  • Decreto 102/2008 de 11 de julio, del Consell, por el que se establece el currículo del Bachillerato en la Comunidad Valenciana [2008/8761] para el área de Educación Física.
  • Deglau, D. & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Chapter 3: The effects of a long-term professional development program on the beliefs and practices of experienced teachers [Monograph]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 379-396.
  • Elliot, D. L.; Atencio, M.; Campbell, T. & Jess, M. (2013). From PE experiences to PE teaching practices? Insights from Scottish primary teachers' experiences of PE, teacher education, school entry and professional development. Sport, Education and Society, 18(6), 749-766.
  • Erwin, H. E.; Woods, A. M.; Woods, M. K. & Castelli, D. M. (2007). Chapter 6: Children’s environmental access in relation to motor competence, physical activity, and fitness [Monograph]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 404-415.
  • Gottardi, G. (1987). Avviamento alla ginnastica artistica. Roma: Sociedad Stampa Deportiva.
  • Goudas, M. & Biddle, S. (1993). Pupil perceptions of enjoyment in physical education. Physical Education Review, 16, 145-150.
  • Ha, A. S.; Wong, A. C.; Sum, R. K. & Chan, D. W. (2008). Understanding teachers' will and capacity to accomplish physical education curriculum reform: The implications for teacher development. Sport, Education and Society, 13(1), 77-95.
  • Hadar, L. L. & Brody, D. L. (2012). The interaction between group processes and personal professional trajectories in a professional development community for teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 45-61.
  • Hassandra, S.; Goudas, M. & Chroni, M. (2003). Examining factors associated with intrinsic motivation in Physical Education: a qualitative approach. Phychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 211-223.
  • Holland, D. & Lave, J. (Eds.) (2001). History in person. Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.
  • Huber, G. L. (2004). AQUAD 6. Manual del programa de análisis de datos cualitativos. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.
  • Kovač, M. & Novak, D. (2001). Učni načrt za osnovno šolo. Športna vzgoja. [Primary school curriculum. Physical Education]. Ljubljana: Zavod RS za šolstvo.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1999). Preparing teachers for diversity: Historical perspectives, current trends, and future directions. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of Policy and Practice (pp. 86-124). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leguet, J. (1985). Actions motrices en gymnastique sportive. Paris: Vigot.
  • Miles, B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analisis. London: Sage Publications.
  • Nunomura, M.; Carrara, P. & Tsukamoto, M. (2010). Ginástica artística e especialização precoce: cedo demais para especializar, tarde demais para ser campeão! [Artistic gymnastics and early specialization: too young to specialize, too old to be a champion!]. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 24, 305-314.
  • Nunomura, M.; Okade, Y. & Carrara, P. (2012). How much artistic gymnastics coaches know about their gymnasts' motivation. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 4(2), 27-37.
  • O’Sullivan, M. & Deglau, D. (2006). Chapter 7: Principles of professional development [Monograph]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 441-449.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
  • Pehkonen, M. (2011). Quality of the teaching process as an explanatory variable in learning gymnastics skills in school physical education. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2(2), 29-40.
  • Rikard, L. & Banville, D. (2006). High school student attitudes about physical education. Sport, Education, and Society, 11, 385-400.
  • Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1-24.
  • Šimůnková, I.; Novotná, V. & Chrudimský, J. ( (2013). Contribution of gymnastic skills to the educational content of physical literacy in elementary school children and youth. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference. Sport and Quality of Life 2013 (pp. 129-137). Brno, Czech Republic: Masaryk University Campus.
  • Sinelnikov, O. A. (2009). Sport education for teachers: Professional development when introducing a novel curriculum model. European Physical Education Review, 15(1), 91-114.
  • Sloan, S. (2007). An investigation into the perceived level of personal subject knowledge and competence of a group of pre-service physical education teachers towards the teaching of secondary school gymnastics. European Physical Education Review, 13(1), 57-80.
  • Standage, M.; Duda, J. L. & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411-433.
  • Stylianou, M.; Kulinna, P. H.; Cothran, D. & Kwon, J. Y. (2013). Physical education teachers’ metaphors of teaching and learning. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32, 22-45.
  • Thompson, S. C.; Gregg, L. & Niska, J. M. (2004). Professional learning communities, leadership, and student learning. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 28(1), 1-15.
  • Tsangaridou, N. (2002). Enacted pedagogical content knowledge in Physical Education: A case study of a prospective classroom teacher. European Physical Education Review, 8(1), 21-36.
  • Wang, C. L. J. & Ha, A. S. C. (2008). The teacher development in Physical Education: A review of the Literature. Asian Social Science, 4(12), 3-18.
  • Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/tech
  • Whitcomb, J.; Borko, H. & Liston, D. (2009). Growing talent. Promising professional development models and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (3), 207-212.
  • Woods, A. M.; Bolton, K. N.; Graber, K. C. & Crull, G. S. (2007). Chapter 5: Influences of perceived motor competence and motives on children’s physical activity [Monograph]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 390-403.
  • Xiang, P.; Lowy, S. & McBride, R. (2002). The impact of a field-based elementary physical education methods course on pre-service classroom teachers' beliefs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 145-161.
  • Živčić-Marković, K.; Sporiš, G. & Čavar, I. (2011). Initial state of motor skills in sports gymnastics among students at Faculty of Kinesiology. Acta Kinesiologica, 5(1), 67-72.