The factor structure of the Spanish version of the Work-Family Culture Scale in a sample of workers from the advertising sector

  1. Beléndez Vázquez, Marina
  2. Martín Llaguno, Marta
  3. Hernández-Ruiz, Alejandra
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 25

Número: 2

Páginas: 232-237

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: la Work-Family Culture Scale (WFCS) fue desarrollada para evaluar las percepciones de los empleados acerca del grado en que sus organizaciones facilitan el equilibrio entre las responsabilidades laborales y familiares de sus trabajadores. La WFCS evalúa tres componentes: demandas o expectativas organizacionales de tiempo, apoyo de la supervisión o dirección y consecuencias negativas para la carrera. Método: el objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar la estructura factorial y la fiabilidad de la versión española de la WFCS en una muestra de 795 trabajadores (447 mujeres y 348 varones) pertenecientes a 23 empresas del sector publicitario español. Resultados: los análisis factoriales exploratorio y confirmatorio resultaron en un modelo de tres factores que se ajustaba a los datos ?2(41)= 63.85; CFI= .99; GFI= .97; y RMSEA= .038. Conclusiones: la consistencia interna de los factores fue adecuada. Los resultados indican que la versión española de la WFCS posee una estructura similar a la escala original.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allen, T. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414-435.
  • Anderson, S.E., Coffey, B.S., & Byerly, R.T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conffict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28, 787-810.
  • Andreassi, J.K., & Thompson, C.A. (2008). Work-family culture: Current research and future directions. In K. Korabik, D.S. Lero & D.L. Whitehead (Eds.), Handbook of work-family integration: Research, theories and best practices (pp. 331-351). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Bailyn, L. (1993). Breaking the mold: Women, men and time in the new corporate world. New York: Free Press.
  • Behson, S.J. (2002). Which dominates? The relative importance of work-family organizational support and general context on employee outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 53-72.
  • Bianchi, S.M., Casper, L.M., & Berkowitz, R. (2005). Work, family, health, and well-being. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Brown T.A. (2006). Conffrmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
  • Byron, D. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conffict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169-198.
  • Casper, W., Eby, L.T., Bordeaux, C., Lockwood, A., & Burnett, D. (2007). A review of methods in IO/OB work-family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28-43.
  • Casper, W.J., & DePaulo, B. (2012). A new layer to inclusión: Creating singles-friendly work environments. In N.P. Reilly, M.J. Sirgy & C.A. Gorman (Eds.), Work and quality of life: Ethical practices in organizations (pp. 217-234). New York: Springer.
  • Chinchilla, M.N., & Poelmans, S. (2002). Cuestionario EFRE© (Empresa Familiarmente Responsable) [IFREI Survey© (IESE Family Responsible Company Index)]. University of Navarra: IESE Business School.
  • Chinchilla, M.N., Poelmans, S., & León, C. (2003). Políticas de conciliación trabajo-familia en 150 empresas españolas [Work-Family Balance Policies in 150 Spanish companies] (IESE Working Paper no 498). University of Navarra: IESE Business School. Retrieved from http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/di-0498.pdf.
  • Chinchilla, N., León, C., Canela, M.A., Ariño, M.A., & Quiroga, V. (2006). Análisis sectorial de las políticas de conciliación. Conclusiones del estudio IFREI 2006 basado en 360 empresas [Sector analysis of workfamily policies. Conclusions from IFREI 2006 based in 360 companies]. University of Navarra: IESE Business School. Retrieved from www. iese.edu/research/pdfs/ESTUDIO-41.pdf.
  • Dikkers, J.S.E., Geurts, S.A.E., Den Dulk, L., Peper, B., Taris, T.W., & Kompier, M.A.J. (2007). Dimensions of work-home culture and their relations with the use of work-home arrangements and work-home interaction. Work & Stress, 21, 155-172.
  • Eby, L T., Casper, W., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124-197.
  • Greenhaus, J.H., Ziegert, J.C., & Allen, T.D. (2012). When familysupportive supervision matters: Relations between multiple sources of support and work-family balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 266-275.
  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Judiesch, M.K., & Lyness, K.S. (1999). Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers' career success. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 641-651.
  • Kirby, E., & Krone, K. (2002). The policy exists but you can't really use it: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.
  • Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
  • Kopalle, P.K., & Lehman, D.R. (1997). Alpha inffation? The impact of eliminating scale items on Cronbach's alpha. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 189-197.
  • Kossek, E.E., & Lambert, S.J. (Eds.) (2005). Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Major, D.A., Fletcher, T.D., Davis, D.D., & Germano, L.M. (2007). The inffuence of work-family culture and workplace relationships on work interference with family: A multilevel model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 881-897.
  • Martín-Llaguno, M. (2007). La mujer en la industria publicitaria. La segregación vertical en la comunicación comercial: techo de cristal y suelo pegajoso [Women in the advertising industry. Vertical segregation in commercial communication: Glass ceiling and sticky ffoor]. Zer, 22, 429-452.
  • Martín-Llaguno, M. (2008). Radiografía del sector publicitario con enfoque de género [Attitude in business communication. Examining gender issues in the Advertising sector]. Telos, 75, 140-152.
  • Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Piitulainen, S. (2005). Work family culture in four organizations in Finland. Community, Work and Family, 2, 115-40.
  • Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Pyykkö, M. (2005). Does work-family conffict mediate the relationship between work-family culture and selfreport distress? Evidence from ffve Finnish organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 509-530.
  • Mauno, S. (2010). Effects of work-family culture on employee well-being: Exploring moderator effects in a longitudinal sample. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 675-695.
  • Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). How family-friendly work environments affect work/family conffict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Labor Research, 27, 555-574.
  • O'Neill, J.W., Harrison, M., Cleveland, J., Almeida, D., Stawski, R., & Crouter, A. (2009). Work-family climate, organizational commitment, and turnover: Multilevel contagion effects of leaders. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 18-29.
  • Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Kossek, E.E., & Sweet, S. (Eds.) (2006). The handbook of work-family: Multi-disciplinary perspectives, methods, and approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Poelmans, S., & Chinchilla, M.N. (2001). The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies. Competing for scarce resources in the labor market. (IESE Working Paper no 438). University of Navarra: IESE Business School. Retrieved from htpp://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0438-E. pdf.
  • Sahibzada, K., Hammer, L.B., Neal, M.B., & Kuang, D.C. (2005). The moderating effects of work-family role combinations and work-family organizational culture on the relationship between family-friendly workplace supports and job satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1-20.
  • Thompson, C.A., Beauvais, L.L., & Lyness, K. (1999). When work-family beneffts are not enough: The inffuence of work-family culture on benefft utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conffict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.
  • Wayne, J.H., Randel, A.E., & Stevens, J. (2006). The role of identity and work-family support in work-family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 445-461.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet